Ultraviolet radiation and bottom-ice algae: Laboratory and field studies from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica

Author(s):  
K. G. Ryan ◽  
D. Beaglehole
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 243-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
DH Robinson ◽  
Z Kolber ◽  
CW Sullivan

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1454-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Corradi ◽  
Katarzyna A Baczynska ◽  
Marco Morelii ◽  
Danilo Giulietti ◽  
Marina Khazova

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Gilreath ◽  
Bielinski M. Santos ◽  
Steven J. Duranceau

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of season of the year, sunlight exposure time, and mulch color on paraquat photodegradation rate on polyethylene mulch. Experiments were established in winter, spring, and summer, with white and black polyethylene mulch, and paraquat-applied films were exposed to sunlight for 1, 4, 8, 24, 30, 48, 72, or 96 h after herbicide application. There was significant effect of the season by mulch color by time of exposure interaction on paraquat concentration recovered from mulch eluants. Winter paraquat photodegradation was lower than during the other seasons. At 48 h of sunlight exposure, predicted photodegradation on white mulch was 67, 83, and 88%, during winter, spring, and summer, respectively, whereas these values were 66, 82, and 84% on black mulch. The difference in paraquat photodegradation in winter with respect to the other seasons may be attributed to reduced ultraviolet radiation in winter, when solar radiation has to penetrate a larger atmosphere mass. In practical terms, transplanting on paraquat-applied mulch requires a minimum of 96 h during the spring and summer seasons, when concentrations were 5% or less, whereas a longer waiting period might be necessary in the winter.


1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 788-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale H. Robinson ◽  
Kevin R. Arrigo ◽  
Zbigniew Kolber ◽  
Michel Gosselin ◽  
Cornelius W. Sullivan

Author(s):  
William J. Baxter

In this form of electron microscopy, photoelectrons emitted from a metal by ultraviolet radiation are accelerated and imaged onto a fluorescent screen by conventional electron optics. image contrast is determined by spatial variations in the intensity of the photoemission. The dominant source of contrast is due to changes in the photoelectric work function, between surfaces of different crystalline orientation, or different chemical composition. Topographical variations produce a relatively weak contrast due to shadowing and edge effects.Since the photoelectrons originate from the surface layers (e.g. ∼5-10 nm for metals), photoelectron microscopy is surface sensitive. Thus to see the microstructure of a metal the thin layer (∼3 nm) of surface oxide must be removed, either by ion bombardment or by thermal decomposition in the vacuum of the microscope.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 260-260
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Rukin ◽  
Samuel J. Moon ◽  
Dhaval Bodiwala ◽  
Christopher J. Luscombe ◽  
Mark F. Saxby ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document