scholarly journals Quantifying lateral heterogeneities in fluvio-deltaic sediments using three-dimensional reflection seismic data: Offshore Gulf of Mexico

1997 ◽  
Vol 102 (B7) ◽  
pp. 15385-15401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Deshpande ◽  
Peter B. Flemings ◽  
Jie Huang
Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Ottolini ◽  
Charles Sword ◽  
Jon F. Claerbout

On‐line movies are an exciting way to view reflection seismic data. We make a movie by slicing through a three‐dimensional (3-D) seismic data cube in a selected direction (Figure 1). By sweeping through the data fast enough, it is possible to get another perspective of what is going on in the data than by examining still frames. By twiddling various knobs and buttons, we can zoom onto a zone of interest, magnify it, rotate it, and change the color to emphasize a feature of interest.


Geophysics ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1116-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. Weglein ◽  
W. E. Boyse ◽  
J. E. Anderson

We present a formalism for obtaining the subsurface velocity configuration directly from reflection seismic data. Our approach is to apply the results obtained for inverse problems in quantum scattering theory to the reflection seismic problem. In particular, we extend the results of Moses (1956) for inverse quantum scattering and Razavy (1975) for the one‐dimensional (1-D) identification of the acoustic wave equation to the problem of identifying the velocity in the three‐dimensional (3-D) acoustic wave equation from boundary value measurements. No a priori knowledge of the subsurface velocity is assumed and all refraction, diffraction, and multiple reflection phenomena are taken into account. In addition, we explain how the idea of slant stack in processing seismic data is an important part of the proposed 3-D inverse scattering formalism.


Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE303-VE311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juergen Pruessmann ◽  
Sven Frehers ◽  
Rodolfo Ballesteros ◽  
Alfredo Caballero ◽  
Gerardo Clemente

A seismic depth-imaging project starts from an initial depth model of interval velocities. From time processing of reflection seismic data, a set of stacking parameters or kinematic data attributes usually is available for an initial model building at little effort. Two methods for initial model building from time-processing attributes are compared in this case study, using 3D seismic land data from the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Conventional normal moveout (NMO)/dip moveout (DMO) time processing performs one-parametric stacking using stacking velocity as the parameter. The stacking velocity field can be converted into a depth model by the well-known vertical Dix inversion, which is very fast and robust but degrades with increasing dip. Common-reflection surface (CRS) time processing, on the contrary, isbased on the multiparametric CRS stacking approach, providing several volumes of CRS-stacking attributes that include the wavefield dip, or horizontal slowness. Inversion of CRS attributes by CRS tomography incorporates this dip information in depth model building. In this case study, CRS or normal-incidence point (NIP) wave tomography is presented as a model-building link between high-resolution CRS time processing and subsequent depth processing. The CRS tomography model shows a better adaptation to the dipping subsurface structures than the Dix model and a good fit to well data. The smooth tomography model is well suited for further use in poststack and prestack depth migrations. It provides a good starting point for iterative model enhancement and salt-body definition in prestack depth migration.


Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 2411-2430 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Horvath

Gulf began investigating three‐dimensional seismic surveys in the mid‐1960s through Gulf Research and Development Company. During the late 1960s, models were constructed to simulate acquisition and processing. Three‐dimensional (3-D) migration was achieved in the early 1970s, and Gulf began field testing 3-D seismic data acquisition in 1974. By 1978, 3-D seismic surveys were available as a commercial service through contractors. Some advantages that 3-D seismic surveys have over 2-D seismic surveys are: they can help refine both structure and stratigraphic interpretations; they assist in defining the paleogeology and reveal details otherwise not apparent; they help determine the reservoir limits through improved interpretation of the structure and hydrocarbon indicators; they enable the acquisition of subsurface control under surface obstructions, such as platforms, rigs, etc.; they provide the opportunity to construct profiles in any direction desired; and they lend themselves to interactive interpretation. When using 3-D seismic surveys, improved seismic resolution is expected. This in turn improves drilling success and finding new reserves, makes the development drilling program more efficient, and provides the best possible location for a wildcat survey. The results achieved in 16 3-D seismic surveys that cover 26 blocks in the offshore Gulf of Mexico reveal that offshore 3-D seismic surveys can be a cost‐effective way of finding and developing hydrocarbons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document