Diurnal/semidiurnal polar motion excited by oceanic tidal angular momentum

1996 ◽  
Vol 101 (B9) ◽  
pp. 20151-20163 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. F. Chao ◽  
R. D. Ray ◽  
J. M. Gipson ◽  
G. D. Egbert ◽  
C. Ma
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Polar Motion

scholarly journals Evaluation of hydrological and cryospheric angular momentum estimates based on GRACE, GRACE-FO and SLR data for their contributions to polar motion excitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Śliwińska ◽  
Jolanta Nastula ◽  
Małgorzata Wińska
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Spherical Harmonic ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Spectral Band ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
High Consistency ◽  
Polar Motion Excitation

AbstractIn geodesy, a key application of data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO), and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is an interpretation of changes in polar motion excitation due to variations in the Earth’s surficial fluids, especially in the continental water, snow, and ice. Such impacts are usually examined by computing hydrological and cryospheric polar motion excitation (hydrological and cryospheric angular momentum, HAM/CAM). Three types of GRACE and GRACE-FO data can be used to determine HAM/CAM, namely degree-2 order-1 spherical harmonic coefficients of geopotential, gridded terrestrial water storage anomalies computed from spherical harmonic coefficients, and terrestrial water storage anomalies obtained from mascon solutions. This study compares HAM/CAM computed from these three kinds of gravimetric data. A comparison of GRACE-based excitation series with HAM/CAM obtained from SLR is also provided. A validation of different HAM/CAM estimates is conducted here using the so-called geodetic residual time series (GAO), which describes the hydrological and cryospheric signal in the observed polar motion excitation. Our analysis of GRACE mission data indicates that the use of mascon solutions provides higher consistency between HAM/CAM and GAO than the use of other datasets, especially in the seasonal spectral band. These conclusions are confirmed by the results obtained for data from first 2 years of GRACE-FO. Overall, after 2 years from the start of GRACE-FO, the high consistency between HAM/CAM and GAO that was achieved during the best GRACE period has not yet been repeated. However, it should be remembered that with the systematic appearance of subsequent GRACE-FO observations, this quality can be expected to increase. SLR data can be used for determination of HAM/CAM to fill the one-year-long data gap between the end of GRACE and the start of the GRACE-FO mission. In addition, SLR series could be particularly useful in determination of HAM/CAM in the non-seasonal spectral band. Despite its low seasonal amplitudes, SLR-based HAM/CAM provides high phase consistency with GAO for annual and semiannual oscillation.

Reconstruction of prograde and retrograde Chandler excitation

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid V. Zotov ◽  
Christian Bizouard
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Atmospheric Angular Momentum ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Oceanic Angular Momentum ◽  
Geophysical Excitation ◽  
Polar Motion Excitation

AbstractObserved polar motion consists of uniform circular motions at both positive (prograde) and negative (retrograde) frequencies. Generalized Euler–Liouville equations of Bizouard, taking into account Earth's triaxiality and asymmetry of the ocean tide, show that the corresponding retrograde and prograde circular excitations are coupled at any frequency. In this work, we reconstructed the polar motion excitation in the Chandler band (prograde and retrograde). Then we compared it with geophysical excitation, filtered out in the same way from the series of the Oceanic Angular Momentum (OAM) and Atmospheric Angular Momentum (AAM) for the period 1960–2000. The agreement was found to be better in the prograde band than in the retrograde one.

Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations, length-of-day changes and polar motion

1983 ◽  
Vol 387 (1792) ◽  
pp. 31-73 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Solid Earth ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Liquid Core ◽  
Atmospheric Angular Momentum ◽  
Axial Component ◽  
Length Of Day ◽  
Momentum Exchange ◽  
Geophysical Research

Variations in the distribution of mass within the atmosphere and changes in the pattern of winds, particularly the strength and location of the major mid-latitude jet-streams, produce fluctuations in all three components of the angular momentum of the atmosphere on timescales upwards of a few days. In a previous study (Hide et al . 1980) it has been shown that variations in the axial component of atmospheric angular momentum during the Special Observing Periods in 1979 of the First GARP Global Experiment (FGGE, where GARP is the Global Atmospheric Research Program) are well correlated with changes in length-of-day. This would be expected if the total angular momentum of the atmosphere and ‘solid’ Earth were conserved on short timescales (allowing for lunar and solar effects) but not if angular momentum transfer between the Earth’s liquid core and solid mantle, which is accepted to be substantial and even dominant on timescales upwards of several years, were significant on timescales of weeks or months. Fluctuations in the equatorial components of atmospheric angular momentum should contribute to the observed wobble of the instantaneous pole of the Earth’s rotation with respect to the Earth’s crust, but this has not been shown conclusively by previous studies. In this paper we re-examine some aspects of the underlying theory of non-rigid body rotational dynamics and angular momentum exchange between the atmosphere and solid Earth. Since only viscous or topographic coupling between the atmosphere and solid Earth can transfer angular momentum, no atmospheric flow that everywhere satisfied inviscid equations (including, but not solely, geostrophic flow) could affect the rotation of a spherical solid Earth. Currently available meteorological data are not adequate for evaluating the usual wobble excitation functions accurately, but we show that partial integration leads to an expression involving simpler functions ─ here called ‘equatorial angular momentum functions’ ─ which can be reliably evaluated from available meteorological data. The length-of-day problem is treated in terms of a similar ‘axial angular momentum function’ ; and ‘effective angular momentum functions’ are defined in order to allow for rotational and surface loading deformation of the Earth. Daily values of these atmospheric angular momentum functions have been calculated from the ‘initialized analysis global database’ of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). They are presented for the period 1 January 1981─30 April 1982, along with the corresponding astronomically observed changes in length-of-day and polar motion, published by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH). Changes in length-of-day during this period can be accounted for almost entirely by angular momentum exchange between the atmosphere and solid Earth, and the existence of a persistent fluctuation in this exchange, with a timescale of about 7 weeks, is confirmed. We also demonstrate that meteorological phenomena provide an important contribution to the excitation of polar motion. Our work offers a theoretical basis for future routine determinations of atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations for the purposes of meteorological and geophysical research, including the assessment of the extent to which movements in the solid Earth associated with very large earthquakes contribute to the excitation of the Chandlerian wobble.

Assessing the role of corrections included in the GRACE/GRACE-FO data in determination of hydrological and cryospheric signal in polar motion excitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Śliwińska ◽  
Małgorzata Wińska ◽  
Jolanta Nastula
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Reference Frames ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frames ◽  
Geophysical Processes ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Hydrological Angular Momentum ◽  
The Impact

<p>Assessing the impact of continental hydrosphere and cryosphere on polar motion (PM) variations is one of the crucial tasks in contemporary geodesy. The pole coordinates, as one of the Earth Orientation Parameters, are needed to define the relationship between the celestial and terrestrial reference frames. Therefore, the variations in PM should be monitored and interpreted in order to assess the role of geophysical processes in this phenomenon.</p><p>The role of hydrological and cryospheric signals in PM is usually examined by computing hydrological excitation (hydrological angular momentum, HAM) and cryospheric excitation (cryospheric angular momentum, CAM) of  PM, commonly treated together as HAM/CAM.</p><p>The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions deliver temporal variations of the gravity field resulting from changes in global mass redistribution. The so-called GRACE/GRACE-FO Level-3 (L3) data delivers changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS) that can be used for computation of HAM/CAM.</p><p>For best possible representation of TWS, a number of corrections are introduced in the L3 data by computing centres. Such corrections are, among others, glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction, geocenter correction and C<sub>20</sub> coefficient correction.</p><p>The main goal of this study is to examine the impact of corrections included in GRACE/GRACE-FO data on HAM/CAM determined. More specifically, we test their influence on HAM/CAM trends, seasonal changes and non-seasonal variations. We also examine the change in compliance between HAM/CAM and hydrological plus cryospheric signal in geodetically observed excitation when the corrections are used. To achieve our goals, we use GRACE and GRACE-FO L3 datasets provided by Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Center for Space Research (CSR), and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC).</p>

Comparison between polar motion excitation functions estimated from recent geophysical models and observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Wińska ◽  
Justyna Śliwińska ◽  
Jolanta Nastula
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Discrete Wavelet ◽  
Excitation Functions ◽  
Geophysical Excitation ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Hydrological Angular Momentum ◽  
Complex Morlet Wavelet ◽  
Project Data

<p>Continental hydrological loading by land water, snow, and ice is a process that influences the Earth’s inertia tensor and is very important for full understanding of the excitation of polar motion. In this study, the hydrological contribution to decadal, inter-annual and multi-annual suppress polar motion derived from different GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) solutions as well as from SLR (Satellite Laser Ranging) and some climate models from CMIP6 project data is discussed here.</p><p>The main aim of this study is to show the influence of different representations of hydrological angular momentum (HAM) coming from different GRACE (mas concentration solutions - mascons, Terrestrial Water Storage changes, and Stokes Coefficients), SLR, and climate models solutions on agreement between Geodetic Angular Momentum (GAM) and geophysical excitations of polar motion been a sum of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrological Angular Momentum (AAM+OAM+HAM) in different spectral bands.</p><p>To do that, the geodetic and geophysical excitation functions are transformed into time-scale domain using the discrete wavelet transform based on the Complex Morlet wavelet functions. Next, the time series (GAM vs. geophysical ones) are compared in terms of semblance filtering, on the basis of their phase, as a function of frequency, and amplitude information of their cross-wavelet power.</p><p>Here, we would like to present the consistency between full polar motion excitations and geophysical fluids,  that are the sum of AAM  (pressure + wind), OAM  (bottom pressure +  currents), and HAM contributions. This analysis could let us indicate, which hydrological representation of different HAM solutions cause the biggest errors in the geodetic budget.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document