Shear wave splitting in refracted waves returned from the upper mantle transition zone beneath northern Australia

1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (B8) ◽  
pp. 15783 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tong ◽  
O. Gudmundsson ◽  
B. L. N. Kennett
Keyword(s):  
Transition Zone ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Northern Australia ◽  
Mantle Transition Zone ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Refracted Waves

Seismic anisotropy of the crust and upper mantle beneath western Tibet revealed by shear wave splitting measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhui Ju ◽  
Junmeng Zhao ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Hongbing Liu
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Wave Splitting

scholarly journals Relation of crustal and upper mantle deformation beneath Sunda-Banda Island Arc inferred from shear-wave splitting analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 1204 ◽  
pp. 012069
Author(s):  
Syuhada Syuhada ◽  
Nanang Tyasbudi Puspito ◽  
Titi Anggono ◽  
Nugroho Dwi Hananto ◽  
Hendra Grandis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Island Arc ◽  
Wave Splitting

Shear wave splitting as diagnostics of variable tectonic fabrics across the Eastern Alps – Bohemian Massif contact zone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luděk Vecsey ◽  
Jaroslava Plomerová ◽  
Vladislav Babuška ◽  
the AlpArray-EASI Working Group ◽  
the AlpArray Working Group
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Bohemian Massif ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Eastern Alps ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Splitting Methods ◽  
Mantle Lithosphere ◽  
Wave Splitting

<p>We examine lateral variations of shear-wave splitting evaluated from data recorded during the passive seismic experiments AlpArray-EASI (2014-2015) and AlpArray Seismic Network (2016-2019). The swath about 200 km broad and 540 km long along 13.3° E longitude was selected to study the large-scale anisotropy in the mantle lithosphere beneath the Bohemian Massif (BM) and the Eastern Alps. The region is covered by about 200 broad-band temporary and permanent stations.</p><p>The shear-wave splitting evaluation consists of several steps: it starts by automated identification and pre-processing of SKS waveforms, filtering and quality check. Then we analyse and, if needed, also correct seismic waveforms for seismometer mis-orientations of all stations used. To improve results of splitting analysis of signals distorted by noise, we carefully apply two splitting methods (eigenvalue, transverse energy). We stack splitting measurements for waves closely propagating within the upper mantle and include particle motion analysis. The modified version of the splitting methods (Vecsey et al., 2008) enables us to retrieve 3-D orientation of large-scale anisotropic structures in the mantle lithosphere and deformations within the sub-lithospheric part of the upper mantle.</p><p>Both the evaluated shear-wave splitting parameters and the particle motions are consistent within sub-regions of the Alpine and BM upper mantle and exhibit significant and often sudden lateral changes across the whole region. We relate such changes to sharply bounded anisotropic domains with uniform fossil fabrics in the mantle lithosphere.</p>

Mantle flow under the Central Alps: Constraints from non-vertical-ray SKS shear-wave splittting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Löberich ◽  
Götz Bokelmann
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Depth Resolution ◽  
Shear Wave Splitting ◽  
Mantle Flow ◽  
Central Alps ◽  
Upper Mantle Anisotropy ◽  
Wave Splitting

<p>The association of seismic anisotropy and deformation, as e.g. exploited by shear-wave splitting measurements, provides a unique opportunity to map the orientation of geodynamic processes in the upper mantle and to constraint their nature. However, due to the limited depth-resolution of steeply arriving core-phases, used for shear-wave splitting investigations, it appears difficult to differentiate between asthenospheric and lithospheric origins of observed seismic anisotropy. To change that, we take advantage of the different backazimuthal variations of fast orientation <em>φ</em> and delay time <em>Δt</em>, when considering the non-vertical incidence of phases passing through an olivine block with vertical b-axis as opposed to one with vertical c-axis. Both these alignments can occur depending on the type of deformation, e.g. a sub-horizontal foliation orientation in the case of a simple asthenospheric flow and a sub-vertical foliation when considering vertically-coherent deformation in the lithosphere. In this study we investigate the cause of seismic anisotropy in the Central Alps. Combining high-quality manual shear-wave splitting measurements of three datasets leads to a dense station coverage. Fast orientations <em>φ</em> show a spatially coherent and relatively simple mountain-chain-parallel pattern, likely related to a single-layer case of upper mantle anisotropy. Considering the measurements of the whole study area together, our non-vertical-ray shear-wave splitting procedure points towards a b-up olivine situation and thus favors an asthenospheric anisotropy source, with a horizontal flow plane of deformation. We also test the influence of position relative to the European slab, distinguishing a northern and southern subarea based on vertically-integrated travel times through a tomographic model. Differences in the statistical distribution of splitting parameters <em>φ</em> and <em>Δt</em>, and in the backazimuthal variation of <em>δφ</em> and <em>δΔt</em>, become apparent. While the observed seismic anisotropy in the northern subarea shows indications of asthenospheric flow, likely a depth-dependent plane Couette-Poiseuille flow around the Alps, the origin in the southern subarea remains more difficult to determine and may also contain effects from the slab itself.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document