The relationship between the magnetic field in the Martian magnetotail and upstream solar wind parameters

1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (A9) ◽  
pp. 17199 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rosenbauer ◽  
M. I. Verigin ◽  
G. A. Kotova ◽  
S. Livi ◽  
A. P. Remizov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Upstream Solar Wind ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Magnetic Field

scholarly journals Cluster-C1 observations on the geometrical structure of linear magnetic holes in the solar wind at 1 AU

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1695-1702 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Xiao ◽  
Q. Q. Shi ◽  
T. L. Zhang ◽  
S. Y. Fu ◽  
L. Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geometrical Structure ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Geometrical Shape ◽  
Magnetic Field Data ◽  
Magnetic Field Magnitude ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Plasma Measurements ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. Interplanetary linear magnetic holes (LMHs) are structures in which the magnetic field magnitude decreases with little change in the field direction. They are a 10–30% subset of all interplanetary magnetic holes (MHs). Using magnetic field and plasma measurements obtained by Cluster-C1, we surveyed the LMHs in the solar wind at 1 AU. In total 567 interplanetary LMHs are identified from the magnetic field data when Cluster-C1 was in the solar wind from 2001 to 2004. We studied the relationship between the durations and the magnetic field orientations, as well as that of the scales and the field orientations of LMHs in the solar wind. It is found that the geometrical structure of the LMHs in the solar wind at 1 AU is consistent with rotational ellipsoid and the ratio of scales along and across the magnetic field is about 1.93:1. In other words, the structure is elongated along the magnetic field at 1 AU. The occurrence rate of LMHs in the solar wind at 1 AU is about 3.7 per day. It is shown that not only the occurrence rate but also the geometrical shape of interplanetary LMHs has no significant change from 0.72 AU to 1 AU in comparison with previous studies. It is thus inferred that most of interplanetary LMHs observed at 1 AU are formed and fully developed before 0.72 AU. The present results help us to study the formation mechanism of the LMHs in the solar wind.

CGL Invariants and the Moments of the Boltzmann–Vlasov Equation

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (14) ◽  
pp. 1345-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fridman
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Vlasov Equation ◽  
Gyration Radius ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Essential Problem ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Transport Laws ◽  
Good Agreement

The transport laws of the noncollisional systems must be obtained from the Boltzmann–Vlasov equation. The most simple cases are the CGL invariants along the magnetic field. The essential problem is to determine the criteria necessary to close the moments system. The lower order in the gyration radius expansion gives the perpendicular contribution to the heat flux. After expansion with the supersonic conditions, the parallel contribution is obtained, and also the second term of the expansions in which the first term is the "invariant." The numerical value of the heat flux can be considered in good agreement with the solar wind parameters, and the corrections to the invariants are found to agree with previous results (kinetical and 20-moments Grad approximation).

Subsolar magnetopause under an inverse gradient of the magnetic field: Statistical study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostiantyn Grygorov ◽  
Zdeněk Němeček ◽  
Jana Šafránková ◽  
Jiří Šimůnek
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Thermal Plasma ◽  
Statistical Study ◽  
The State ◽  
Upstream Solar Wind ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>The magnetopause is usually at the point where the pressure of the magnetospheric magnetic field is balanced by a sum of the thermal plasma and magnetic pressures on the magnetosheath side. However, statistics from THEMIS magnetopause crossings have showed that about 2 % of them exhibit a larger magnetic field in the magnetosheath than in the magnetosphere in the subsolar region (Y<sub>GSM </sub>< 5 R<sub>E</sub>) and thus, the pressure from the magnetosheath side seems to be uncompensated. In our study, we compare parameters of those unusual crossings with the rest of our statistic in that region with motivation to highlight the possible sources and mechanisms of this apparent pressure imbalance, which can be caused either by specific upstream solar wind conditions or by the state of the magnetosphere. We also compare our THEMIS results with the sets of magnetopause crossings observed by other spacecraft (e.g., Cluster, MMS).</p>

scholarly journals Magnetopause stand-off distance in dependence on the magnetosheath and solar wind parameters

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Pudovkin ◽  
B. P. Besser ◽  
S. A. Zaitseva
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Wind Data ◽  
Magnetospheric Physics ◽  
Magnetic Field Penetration ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Field Penetration

Abstract. A model of the magnetosheath structure proposed in a recent paper from the authors is extended to estimate the magnetopause stand-off distance from solar wind data. For this purpose, the relationship of the magnetopause location to the magnetosheath and solar wind parameters is studied. It is shown that magnetopause erosion may be explained in terms of the magnetosheath magnetic field penetration into the magnetosphere. The coefficient of penetration (the ratio of the magnetospheric magnetic field depression to the intensity of the magnetosheath magnetic field Bm⊥z=–Bmsin2Θ/2, is estimated and found approximately to equal 1. It is shown that having combined a magnetosheath model presented in an earlier paper and the magnetosheath field penetration model presented in this paper, it is possible to predict the magnetopause stand-off distance from solar wind parameters.Key words. Magnetospheric physics · Magnetopause · Cusp and boundary layers-Magnetosheath

Short timescale magnetic field fluctuations and their impact on space weather forecasting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Santarelli ◽  
Paola De Michelis ◽  
Giuseppe Consolini
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Space Weather ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Magnetic Signal ◽  
Short Timescale ◽  
Field Fluctuations ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>The features of the horizontal intensity of the geomagnetic field fluctuations during a geomagnetically disturbed period are analyzed. The Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) method is applied to separate short timescale (T<200 min) and long timescale (T>200 min) magnetic field fluctuations, which have been suggested to be related to different physical processes. The magnetic fluctuations at long timescales (T>200 min) seem to show a large degree of correlation between solar wind parameters and magnetospheric dynamics proxies, while the magnetic field fluctuations at short timescales (T<200 min) seem to be essentially related to internal magnetospheric processes and not directly driven by interplanetary changes.</p><p>Daily maps of the short timescale magnetic field fluctuations during a selected period are analyzed in order to investigate their contribution to the total magnetic signal. The aim is to evaluate the role that the internal magnetospheric processes have on the magnetic signal recorded on the ground and to investigate their dependence on the geomagnetic activity level. A comparison between the two hemispheres is also shown. The obtained results can be useful in the Space weather framework. They show the magnetic field fluctuation forecasting requires the development of models that take into account not only the solar wind parameters but also the internal dynamics of the magnetosphere that although triggered by changes of the interplanetary conditions is not directly driven by solar wind/interplanetary magnetic field.</p>

scholarly journals Cluster observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by interplanetary shocks and pressure increases

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. J. Huttunen ◽  
J. Slavin ◽  
M. Collier ◽  
H. E. J. Koskinen ◽  
A. Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Interplanetary Shock ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Shock Propagation ◽  
Interplanetary Shocks ◽  
Maximum Variance ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. Sudden impulses (SI) in the tail lobe magnetic field associated with solar wind pressure enhancements are investigated using measurements from Cluster. The magnetic field components during the SIs change in a manner consistent with the assumption that an antisunward moving lateral pressure enhancement compresses the magnetotail axisymmetrically. We found that the maximum variance SI unit vectors were nearly aligned with the associated interplanetary shock normals. For two of the tail lobe SI events during which Cluster was located close to the tail boundary, Cluster observed the inward moving magnetopause. During both events, the spacecraft location changed from the lobe to the magnetospheric boundary layer. During the event on 6 November 2001 the magnetopause was compressed past Cluster. We applied the 2-D Cartesian model developed by collier98 in which a vacuum uniform tail lobe magnetic field is compressed by a step-like pressure increase. The model underestimates the compression of the magnetic field, but it fits the magnetic field maximum variance component well. For events for which we could determine the shock normal orientation, the differences between the observed and calculated shock propagation times from the location of WIND/Geotail to the location of Cluster were small. The propagation speeds of the SIs between the Cluster spacecraft were comparable to the solar wind speed. Our results suggest that the observed tail lobe SIs are due to lateral increases in solar wind dynamic pressure outside the magnetotail boundary.

scholarly journals Solar wind and substorm excitation of the wavy current sheet

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2457-2474 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Forsyth ◽  
M. Lester ◽  
R. C. Fear ◽  
E. Lucek ◽  
I. Dandouras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Current Sheet ◽  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Expansion Velocity ◽  
Solar Wind Pressure ◽  
Wave Models ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. Following a solar wind pressure pulse on 3 August 2001, GOES 8, GOES 10, Cluster and Polar observed dipolarizations of the magnetic field, accompanied by an eastward expansion of the aurora observed by IMAGE, indicating the occurrence of two substorms. Prior to the first substorm, the motion of the plasma sheet with respect to Cluster was in the ZGSM direction. Observations following the substorms show the occurrence of current sheet waves moving predominantly in the −YGSM direction. Following the second substorm, the current sheet waves caused multiple current sheet crossings of the Cluster spacecraft, previously studied by Zhang et al. (2002). We further this study to show that the velocity of the current sheet waves was similar to the expansion velocity of the substorm aurora and the expansion of the dipolarization regions in the magnetotail. Furthermore, we compare these results with the current sheet wave models of Golovchanskaya and Maltsev (2005) and Erkaev et al. (2008). We find that the Erkaev et al. (2008) model gives the best fit to the observations.

scholarly journals Experimental and numerical investigation of plasma parameters in the magnetosheath

2018 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 03003
Author(s):  
Polya Dobreva ◽  
Monio Kartalev ◽  
Olga Nitcheva ◽  
Natalia Borodkova ◽  
Georgy Zastenker
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Numerical Investigation ◽  
Euler Equations ◽  
Ideal Gas ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
Plasma Parameters ◽  
Wind Spacecraft ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Good Agreement

We investigate the behaviour of the plasma parameters in the magnetosheath in a case when Interball-1 satellite stayed in the magnetosheath, crossing the tail magnetopause. In our analysis we apply the numerical magnetosheath-magnetosphere model as a theoretical tool. The bow shock and the magnetopause are self-consistently determined in the process of the solution. The flow in the magnetosheath is governed by the Euler equations of compressible ideal gas. The magnetic field in the magnetosphere is calculated by a variant of the Tsyganenko model, modified to account for an asymmetric magnetopause. Also, the magnetopause currents in Tsyganenko model are replaced by numericaly calulated ones. Measurements from WIND spacecraft are used as a solar wind monitor. The results demonstrate a good agreement between the model-calculated and measured values of the parameters under investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document