Santa Cruz mountains (Loma Prieta) earthquake

Eos ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 70 (45) ◽  
pp. 1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen C. McNally ◽  
Thorne Lay ◽  
Marino Protti-Quesada ◽  
Gianluca Valensise ◽  
Dan Orange ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles C. Thiel ◽  
James E. Schneider ◽  
Donald Hiatt ◽  
Michael E. Durkin

AbstractThe Santa Cruz County 9-1-1 emergency response system was taxed severely with over 1,000 calls during the first seven hours following the Loma Prieta earthquake. It remained functional and responsive, making 229 ambulance runs in the 72-hour period following the earthquake. Initially, the demand was very high compared to normal, but decreased to slightly greater than normal levels during the second day. A fewer than normal number of advanced life support transports were required, and the number of vehicular accident cases were fewer than normal following the earthquake. The 9-1-1 center adopted an abbreviated procedure and only attempted to determine if the call was a medical emergency and the location for dispatch. During the initial emergency period, there were an unusually low proportion of transports and an unusually high number of cases in which the patient was not located. The medical system in Santa Cruz County was able to accommodate the injury load: the health care system was extensive; its three community hospitals were not damaged severely; and there was light demand.Based on this experience, a revised 9-1-1 emergency medical services (EMS) procedure is recommended for disaster periods: 1) the dispatcher inquires whether the patient can be transported by other means; 2) the caller is asked to explain the need for an ambulance in order to assign a priority to the request; and 3) the caller is asked to cancel the call if there no longer is a need. This procedure is expected to improve disaster management of limited ambulance resources during and following a disaster, while maintaining rapid call processing.


Author(s):  
Peter Marks

This report has been modified from one presented to the Wellington City Council and sets out observations and conclusions gained from a visit to San Francisco and the area affected by the Loma Prieta Earthquake which struck the San Francisco Bay area on 17 October 1989. I visited the area from 29 November to 8 December 1989. The earthquake occurred at 5.04pm local time and was measured at 7.1 on the Richter scale. It was located 16km NE of Santa Cruz and 30km south of San Jose in the Santa Cruz mountains, 100 km south of San Francisco City. Sixty two people were killed, 994 homes destroyed with 18,000 not occupiable immediately after the earthquake. 155 businesses were destroyed and 2,500 businesses closed temporarily. Cost of damage is estimated at between 6.5 and 10 billion US dollars. San Francisco City suffered a major visitor decline after the earthquake. I attended as one of three members of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering "Follow Up" Reconnaissance team for the purpose of establishing what damage had occurred to sewer and stormwater systems, water supply systems and gas utilities. My visit was funded by the Wellington City Council and was mostly devoted to study of sewer and stormwater systems.


1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-669
Author(s):  
Zhengyu Xu ◽  
Susan Y. Schwartz ◽  
Thorne Lay

Abstract A rectangular (4 by 5) array of short-period three-component seismometers with 15-m spacing was deployed to record several U.S. Geological Survey calibration explosions detonated around the Santa Cruz Mountains. The array was located at a site where an earlier station had recorded frequency-dependent polarized site resonances for aftershocks of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. The site is on a hillside believed to be a landslide structure, with the near surface consisting of poorly sorted sediments and weathered rocks with dipping subsurface layers. The primary objective was to explore the site effects in this complex three-dimensional soft-rock environment, characteristic of much of the Loma Prieta source region. The direct P waves from four nearby (15 to 20 km) explosions at easterly azimuths from the array show counterclockwise arrival azimuth anomalies of 30° to 50°. These deflections are attributed to the presence of more than one dipping velocity contrast beneath the array, with dips of from 10° to 50° and dip directions generally toward the south. One such boundary may correspond to the landslide slip surface, and the presence of dipping velocity contrasts underlying the site is probably responsible for some of the observed directional site resonance. A slowness vector analysis demonstrates that arrivals early in the P coda have similar azimuthal anomalies, while later scattered arrivals come from many azimuths. Particle motions indicate that the more coherent arrivals in the coda are comprised of scattered P waves and Rayleigh waves, probably associated with scattering from the rough topography in the region. The coda displays greater spatial coherency along the hill strike than down the slope, consistent with a wedge-shaped landslide. The overall wave-field spatial coherence, CCC(f, Δx), decreases with increasing frequency, f, and spatial offset, Δx, and on average can be well represented by CCC(f, Δx) = e−cfΔx, with c = 0.6 km−1 Hz−1 for the vertical P wave in the first 1-sec window. This behavior is comparable to that found for previously studied hard-rock locations.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. King ◽  
D.L. Carver ◽  
R.A. Williams ◽  
D.M. Worley ◽  
Edward Cranswick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document