scholarly journals Numerical analysis of the effect of subgrid variability in a physically based hydrological model on runoff, soil moisture, and slope stability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Leonarduzzi ◽  
R. M. Maxwell ◽  
B. B. Mirus ◽  
P. Molnar
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Slope Stability ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Physically Based

scholarly journals Prediction of snowmelt derived streamflow in a wetland dominated prairie basin

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1103-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Fang ◽  
J. W. Pomeroy ◽  
C. J. Westbrook ◽  
X. Guo ◽  
A. G. Minke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Field Observations ◽  
Runoff Generation ◽  
Stream Channels ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Spot 5

Abstract. The eastern Canadian Prairies are dominated by cropland, pasture, woodland and wetland areas. The region is characterized by many poor and internal drainage systems and large amounts of surface water storage. Consequently, basins here have proven challenging to hydrological model predictions which assume good drainage to stream channels. The Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling platform (CRHM) is an assembly system that can be used to set up physically based, flexible, object oriented models. CRHM was used to create a prairie hydrological model for the externally drained Smith Creek Research Basin (~400 km2), east-central Saskatchewan. Physically based modules were sequentially linked in CRHM to simulate snow processes, frozen soils, variable contributing area and wetland storage and runoff generation. Five "representative basins" (RBs) were used and each was divided into seven hydrological response units (HRUs): fallow, stubble, grassland, river channel, open water, woodland, and wetland as derived from a supervised classification of SPOT 5 imagery. Two types of modelling approaches calibrated and uncalibrated, were set up for 2007/08 and 2008/09 simulation periods. For the calibrated modelling, only the surface depression capacity of upland area was calibrated in the 2007/08 simulation period by comparing simulated and observed hydrographs; while other model parameters and all parameters in the uncalibrated modelling were estimated from field observations of soils and vegetation cover, SPOT 5 imagery, and analysis of drainage network and wetland GIS datasets as well as topographic map based and LiDAR DEMs. All the parameters except for the initial soil properties and antecedent wetland storage were kept the same in the 2008/09 simulation period. The model performance in predicting snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow was evaluated and comparisons were made between the calibrated and uncalibrated modelling for both simulation periods. Calibrated and uncalibrated predictions of snow accumulation were very similar and compared fairly well with the distributed field observations for the 2007/08 period with slightly poorer results for the 2008/09 period. Soil moisture content at a point during the early spring was adequately simulated and very comparable between calibrated and uncalibrated results for both simulation periods. The calibrated modelling had somewhat better performance in simulating spring streamflow in both simulation periods, whereas the uncalibrated modelling was still able to capture the streamflow hydrographs with good accuracy. This suggests that prediction of prairie basins without calibration is possible if sufficient data on meteorology, basin landcover and physiography are available.

scholarly journals Comparison of soil moisture fields estimated by catchment modelling and remote sensing: a case study in South Africa

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vischel ◽  
G. G. S. Pegram ◽  
S. Sinclair ◽  
W. Wagner ◽  
A. Bartsch
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Good Correspondence ◽  
Physically Based

Abstract. The paper compares two independent approaches to estimate soil moisture at the regional scale over a 4625 km2 catchment (Liebenbergsvlei, South Africa). The first estimate is derived from a physically-based hydrological model (TOPKAPI). The second estimate is derived from the scatterometer on board the European Remote Sensing satellite (ERS). Results show a good correspondence between the modelled and remotely sensed soil moisture, particularly with respect to the soil moisture dynamic, illustrated over two selected seasons of 8 months, yielding regression R2 coefficients lying between 0.68 and 0.92. Such a close similarity between these two different, independent approaches is very promising for (i) remote sensing in general (ii) the use of hydrological models to back-calculate and disaggregate the satellite soil moisture estimate and (iii) for hydrological models to assimilate the remotely sensed soil moisture.

scholarly journals Testing the Robustness of a Physically-Based Hydrological Model in Two Data Limited Inland Valley Catchments in Dano, Burkina Faso

Hydrology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Mouhamed Idrissou ◽  
Bernd Diekkrüger ◽  
Bernhard Tischbein ◽  
Boubacar Ibrahim ◽  
Yacouba Yira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Water Balance ◽  
Burkina Faso ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Inland Valley ◽  
Physically Based

This study investigates the robustness of the physically-based hydrological model WaSiM (water balance and flow simulation model) for simulating hydrological processes in two data sparse small-scale inland valley catchments (Bankandi-Loffing and Mebar) in Burkina Faso. An intensive instrumentation with two weather stations, three rain recorders, 43 piezometers, and one soil moisture station was part of the general effort to reduce the scarcity of hydrological data in West Africa. The data allowed us to successfully parameterize, calibrate (2014–2015), and validate (2016) WaSiM for the Bankandi-Loffing catchment. Good model performance concerning discharge in the calibration period (R2 = 0.91, NSE = 0.88, and KGE = 0.82) and validation period (R2 = 0.82, NSE = 0.77, and KGE = 0.57) was obtained. The soil moisture (R2 = 0.7, NSE = 0.7, and KGE = 0.8) and the groundwater table (R2 = 0.3, NSE = 0.2, and KGE = 0.5) were well simulated, although not explicitly calibrated. The spatial transposability of the model parameters from the Bankandi-Loffing model was investigated by applying the best parameter-set to the Mebar catchment without any recalibration. This resulted in good model performance in 2014–2015 (R2 = 0.93, NSE = 0.92, and KGE = 0.84) and in 2016 (R2 = 0.65, NSE = 0.64, and KGE = 0.59). This suggests that the parameter-set achieved in this study can be useful for modeling ungauged inland valley catchments in the region. The water balance shows that evaporation is more important than transpiration (76% and 24%, respectively, of evapotranspiration losses) and the surface flow is very sensitive to the observed high interannual variability of rainfall. Interflow dominates the uplands, but base flow is the major component of stream flow in inland valleys. This study provides useful information for the better management of soil and scarce water resources for smallholder farming in the area.

scholarly journals HIRESSS: a physically based slope stability simulator for HPC applications

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rossi ◽  
F. Catani ◽  
L. Leoni ◽  
S. Segoni ◽  
V. Tofani
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo Simulation ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Slope Stability ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Unsaturated Soil ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Pressure Head ◽  
Stability Model ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Geotechnical Stability

Abstract. HIRESSS (HIgh REsolution Slope Stability Simulator) is a physically based distributed slope stability simulator for analyzing shallow landslide triggering conditions in real time and on large areas using parallel computational techniques. The physical model proposed is composed of two parts: hydrological and geotechnical. The hydrological model receives the rainfall data as dynamical input and provides the pressure head as perturbation to the geotechnical stability model that computes the factor of safety (FS) in probabilistic terms. The hydrological model is based on an analytical solution of an approximated form of the Richards equation under the wet condition hypothesis and it is introduced as a modeled form of hydraulic diffusivity to improve the hydrological response. The geotechnical stability model is based on an infinite slope model that takes into account the unsaturated soil condition. During the slope stability analysis the proposed model takes into account the increase in strength and cohesion due to matric suction in unsaturated soil, where the pressure head is negative. Moreover, the soil mass variation on partially saturated soil caused by water infiltration is modeled. The model is then inserted into a Monte Carlo simulation, to manage the typical uncertainty in the values of the input geotechnical and hydrological parameters, which is a common weak point of deterministic models. The Monte Carlo simulation manages a probability distribution of input parameters providing results in terms of slope failure probability. The developed software uses the computational power offered by multicore and multiprocessor hardware, from modern workstations to supercomputing facilities (HPC), to achieve the simulation in reasonable runtimes, compatible with civil protection real time monitoring. A first test of HIRESSS in three different areas is presented to evaluate the reliability of the results and the runtime performance on large areas.

scholarly journals Comparisons of distributed and lumped rainfall-runoff model for soil moisture estimation

2021 ◽  
Vol 930 (1) ◽  
pp. 012071
Author(s):  
R I Hapsari ◽  
M Syarifuddin ◽  
R I Putri ◽  
D Novianto
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Tank Model ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Lumped Model ◽  
Ground Measurement ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model

Abstract Soil moisture is an important parameter in landslides because of increased pore pressure and decreased shear strength. This research aims to derive soil moisture indicators from two hydrological models: the physically-based distributed hydrological model and the lumped model. Rainfall-Runoff-Inundation (RRI) Model is used to simulate the hydrological response of catchments to the rainfall-induced landslide in a distributed manner. Tank Model as a lumped hydrological model is also used in this study to simulate the dynamic of soil moisture. The study area is the upper Brantas River Basin, prone to landslides due to heavy rainfall and steep slope. Calibration of the model is conducted by tuning the model according to the river discharge data. The simulation indicates that acceptable performance is confirmed. Tank Model can provide the dynamic of the soil moisture. However, by using this approach, the spatial variation of the soil moisture cannot be presented. Regarding the quantitative amount of soil water content, RRI Model could make a reasonable simulation though the temporal variation is not adequately reproduced. Validation of this method with satellite soil moisture as well as ground measurement is also presented. The challenges of using these approaches to develop landslide hazard assessment are discussed.

scholarly journals Comparison of soil moisture fields estimated by catchment modelling and remote sensing: a case study in South Africa

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2273-2306 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Vischel ◽  
G. Pegram ◽  
S. Sinclair ◽  
W. Wagner ◽  
A. Bartsch
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Good Correspondence ◽  
Physically Based

Abstract. The paper compares two independent approaches to estimate soil moisture at the regional scale over a 4625 km2 catchment (Liebenbergsvlei, South Africa). The first estimate is derived from a physically-based hydrological model (TOPKAPI). The second estimate is derived from the scatterometer on board on the European Remote Sensing satellite (ERS). Results show a very good correspondence between the modelled and remotely sensed soil moisture, illustrated over two selected seasons of 8 months by regression R2 coefficients lying between 0.78 and 0.92. Such a close similarity between these two different, independent approaches is very promising for (i) remote sensing in general (ii) the use of hydrological models to back-calculate and disaggregate the satellite soil moisture estimate and (iii) for hydrological models to assimilate the remotely sensed soil moisture.

scholarly journals Sensitivity and Performance Analyses of the Distributed Hydrology–Soil–Vegetation Model Using Geomorphons for Landform Mapping

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 2032
Author(s):  
Pâmela A. Melo ◽  
Lívia A. Alvarenga ◽  
Javier Tomasella ◽  
Carlos R. Mello ◽  
Minella A. Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complex Terrain ◽  
Overland Flow ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
Vegetation Model ◽  
Landform Classification ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Streamflow Simulation

Landform classification is important for representing soil physical properties varying continuously across the landscape and for understanding many hydrological processes in watersheds. Considering it, this study aims to use a geomorphology map (Geomorphons) as an input to a physically based hydrological model (Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM)) in a mountainous headwater watershed. A sensitivity analysis of five soil parameters was evaluated for streamflow simulation in each Geomorphons feature. As infiltration and saturation excess overland flow are important mechanisms for streamflow generation in complex terrain watersheds, the model’s input soil parameters were most sensitive in the “slope”, “hollow”, and “valley” features. Thus, the simulated streamflow was compared with observed data for calibration and validation. The model performance was satisfactory and equivalent to previous simulations in the same watershed using pedological survey and moisture zone maps. Therefore, the results from this study indicate that a geomorphologically based map is applicable and representative for spatially distributing hydrological parameters in the DHSVM.

scholarly journals SHETRAN and HEC HMS Model Evaluation for Runoff and Soil Moisture Simulation in the Jičinka River Catchment (Czech Republic)

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Vesna Đukić ◽  
Ranka Erić
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Czech Republic ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
River Catchment ◽  
Hydrological Variable ◽  
Model Structures

Due to the improvement of computation power, in recent decades considerable progress has been made in the development of complex hydrological models. On the other hand, simple conceptual models have also been advanced. Previous studies on rainfall–runoff models have shown that model performance depends very much on the model structure. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a complex hydrological model leads to more accurate results or not and to analyze whether some model structures are more efficient than others. Different configurations of the two models of different complexity, the Système Hydrologique Européen TRANsport (SHETRAN) and Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), were compared and evaluated in simulating flash flood runoff for the small (75.9 km2) Jičinka River catchment in the Czech Republic. The two models were compared with respect to runoff simulations at the catchment outlet and soil moisture simulations within the catchment. The results indicate that the more complex SHETRAN model outperforms the simpler HEC HMS model in case of runoff, but not for soil moisture. It can be concluded that the models with higher complexity do not necessarily provide better model performance, and that the reliability of hydrological model simulations can vary depending on the hydrological variable under consideration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document