scholarly journals Geneses of Two Contrasting Antigorite Crystal Preferred Orientations and Their Implications for Seismic Anisotropy in the Forearc Mantle

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlong Liu ◽  
Junfeng Zhang ◽  
Yi Cao ◽  
Zhenmin Jin
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Forearc Mantle

Reverse time migration in tilted transversely isotropic media

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Razec Cezar Sampaio Pinto da Silva Torres ◽  
Leandro Di Bartolo
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Computer Clusters ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
Tti Media

ABSTRACT. Reverse time migration (RTM) is one of the most powerful methods used to generate images of the subsurface. The RTM was proposed in the early 1980s, but only recently it has been routinely used in exploratory projects involving complex geology – Brazilian pre-salt, for example. Because the method uses the two-way wave equation, RTM is able to correctly image any kind of geological environment (simple or complex), including those with anisotropy. On the other hand, RTM is computationally expensive and requires the use of computer clusters. This paper proposes to investigate the influence of anisotropy on seismic imaging through the application of RTM for tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media in pre-stack synthetic data. This work presents in detail how to implement RTM for TTI media, addressing the main issues and specific details, e.g., the computational resources required. A couple of simple models results are presented, including the application to a BP TTI 2007 benchmark model.Keywords: finite differences, wave numerical modeling, seismic anisotropy. Migração reversa no tempo em meios transversalmente isotrópicos inclinadosRESUMO. A migração reversa no tempo (RTM) é um dos mais poderosos métodos utilizados para gerar imagens da subsuperfície. A RTM foi proposta no início da década de 80, mas apenas recentemente tem sido rotineiramente utilizada em projetos exploratórios envolvendo geologia complexa, em especial no pré-sal brasileiro. Por ser um método que utiliza a equação completa da onda, qualquer configuração do meio geológico pode ser corretamente tratada, em especial na presença de anisotropia. Por outro lado, a RTM é dispendiosa computacionalmente e requer o uso de clusters de computadores por parte da indústria. Este artigo apresenta em detalhes uma implementação da RTM para meios transversalmente isotrópicos inclinados (TTI), abordando as principais dificuldades na sua implementação, além dos recursos computacionais exigidos. O algoritmo desenvolvido é aplicado a casos simples e a um benchmark padrão, conhecido como BP TTI 2007.Palavras-chave: diferenças finitas, modelagem numérica de ondas, anisotropia sísmica.

LINKING LITHOLOGY, STRUCTURE, AND ROCK PROPERTIES TO OBSERVED SEISMIC ANISOTROPY IN COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN CRUST

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Frothingham ◽  
◽  
Kevin H. Mahan ◽  
Vera Schulte-Pelkum ◽  
Jonathan S. Caine
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Rocky Mountain ◽  
Rock Properties

scholarly journals The competing effects of olivine and orthopyroxene CPO on seismic anisotropy

2021 ◽  
pp. 228954
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Bernard ◽  
Vera Schulte-Pelkum ◽  
Whitney M. Behr
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy

Oceanic crustal flow in Iceland observed using seismic anisotropy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-173
Author(s):  
Omry Volk ◽  
Robert S. White ◽  
Simone Pilia ◽  
Robert G. Green ◽  
John Maclennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy

Postseismic geodetic signature of cold forearc mantle in subduction zones

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
Haipeng Luo ◽  
Kelin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zones ◽  
Forearc Mantle

scholarly journals Anomalous azimuthal variations with 360° periodicity of Rayleigh phase velocities observed in Scandinavia

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (3) ◽  
pp. 1684-1704
Author(s):  
Alexandra Mauerberger ◽  
Valérie Maupin ◽  
Ólafur Gudmundsson ◽  
Frederik Tilmann
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Shear Velocity ◽  
Velocity Variation ◽  
The South ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Lithospheric Thickness ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
The North ◽  
Southern Norway

SUMMARY We use the recently deployed ScanArray network of broad-band stations covering most of Norway and Sweden as well as parts of Finland to analyse the propagation of Rayleigh waves in Scandinavia. Applying an array beamforming technique to teleseismic records from ScanArray and permanent stations in the study region, in total 159 stations with a typical station distance of about 70 km, we obtain phase velocities for three subregions, which collectively cover most of Scandinavia (excluding southern Norway). The average phase dispersion curves are similar for all three subregions. They resemble the dispersion previously observed for the South Baltic craton and are about 1 per cent slower than the North Baltic shield phase velocities for periods between 40 and 80 s. However, a remarkable sin(1θ) phase velocity variation with azimuth is observed for periods >35 s with a 5 per cent deviation between the maximum and minimum velocities, more than the overall lateral variation in average velocity. Such a variation, which is incompatible with seismic anisotropy, occurs in northern Scandinavia and southern Norway/Sweden but not in the central study area. The maximum and minimum velocities were measured for backazimuths of 120° and 300°, respectively. These directions are perpendicular to a step in the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) inferred by previous studies in southern Norway/Sweden, suggesting a relation to large lithospheric heterogeneity. In order to test this hypothesis, we carried out 2-D full-waveform modeling of Rayleigh wave propagation in synthetic models which incorporate a steep gradient in the LAB in combination with a pronounced reduction in the shear velocity below the LAB. This setup reproduces the observations qualitatively, and results in higher phase velocities for propagation in the direction of shallowing LAB, and lower ones for propagation in the direction of deepening LAB, probably due to the interference of forward scattered and reflected surface wave energy with the fundamental mode. Therefore, the reduction in lithospheric thickness towards southern Norway in the south, and towards the Atlantic ocean in the north provide a plausible explanation for the observed azimuthal variations.

scholarly journals Large-scale variation in seismic anisotropy in the crust and upper mantle beneath Anatolia, Turkey

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric P. Legendre ◽  
Li Zhao ◽  
Tai-Lin Tseng
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Seismic Anisotropy ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Wave Splitting ◽  
Mantle Processes ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Subduction System ◽  
Anisotropic Phase ◽  
Regional Tectonics

AbstractThe average anisotropy beneath Anatolia is very strong and is well constrained by shear-wave splitting measurements. However, the vertical layering of anisotropy and the contribution of each layer to the overall pattern is still an open question. Here, we construct anisotropic phase-velocity maps of fundamental-mode Rayleigh waves for the Anatolia region using ambient noise seismology and records from several regional seismic stations. We find that the anisotropy patterns in the crust, lithosphere and asthenosphere beneath Anatolia have limited amplitudes and are generally consistent with regional tectonics and mantle processes dominated by the collision between Eurasia and Arabia and the Aegean/Anatolian subduction system. The anisotropy of these layers in the crust and upper mantle are, however, not consistent with the strong average anisotropy measured in this area. We therefore suggest that the main contribution to overall anisotropy likely originates from a deep and highly anisotropic region round the mantle transition zone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document