scholarly journals Dynamics of Large‐Scale Solar‐Wind Streams Obtained by the Double Superposed Epoch Analysis: 4. Helium Abundance

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. I. Yermolaev ◽  
I. G. Lodkina ◽  
M. Y. Yermolaev ◽  
M. O. Riazantseva ◽  
L. S. Rakhmanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Helium Abundance ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Epoch Analysis

scholarly journals Dynamics of large‐scale solar wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 7094-7106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Yermolaev ◽  
I. G. Lodkina ◽  
N. S. Nikolaeva ◽  
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Epoch Analysis

scholarly journals Specific interplanetary conditions for CIR-, Sheath-, and ICME-induced geomagnetic storms obtained by double superposed epoch analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2177-2186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Yermolaev ◽  
N. S. Nikolaeva ◽  
I. G. Lodkina ◽  
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Magnetic Cloud ◽  
Magnetic Storms ◽  
Main Phase ◽  
Corotating Interaction Region ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Epoch Analysis ◽  
Archive Data ◽  
Scale Types

Abstract. A comparison of specific interplanetary conditions for 798 magnetic storms with Dst <−50 nT during 1976–2000 was made on the basis of the OMNI archive data. We categorized various large-scale types of solar wind as interplanetary drivers of storms: corotating interaction region (CIR), Sheath, interplanetary CME (ICME) including both magnetic cloud (MC) and Ejecta, separately MC and Ejecta, and "Indeterminate" type. The data processing was carried out by the method of double superposed epoch analysis which uses two reference times (onset of storm and minimum of Dst index) and makes a re-scaling of the main phase of the storm in a such way that all storms have equal durations of the main phase in the new time reference frame. This method reproduced some well-known results and allowed us to obtain some new results. Specifically, obtained results demonstrate that (1) in accordance with "output/input" criteria the highest efficiency in generation of magnetic storms is observed for Sheath and the lowest one for MC, and (2) there are significant differences in the properties of MC and Ejecta and in their efficiencies.

scholarly journals Different magnetospheric modes: solar wind driving and coupling efficiency

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4281-4291 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Partamies ◽  
T. I. Pulkkinen ◽  
R. L. McPherron ◽  
K. McWilliams ◽  
C. R. Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Coupling Efficiency ◽  
Slow Solar Wind ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Particle Injection ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Magnetospheric Convection ◽  
Epoch Analysis ◽  
Steady Convection

Abstract. This study describes a systematic statistical comparison of isolated non-storm substorms, steady magnetospheric convection (SMC) intervals and sawtooth events. The number of events is approximately the same in each group and the data are taken from about the same years to avoid biasing by different solar cycle phase. The very same superposed epoch analysis is performed for each event group to show the characteristics of ground-based indices (AL, PCN, PC potential), particle injection at the geostationary orbit and the solar wind and IMF parameters. We show that the monthly occurrence of sawtooth events and isolated non-stormtime substorms closely follows maxima of the geomagnetic activity at (or close to) the equinoxes. The most strongly solar wind driven event type, sawtooth events, is the least efficient in coupling the solar wind energy to the auroral ionosphere, while SMC periods are associated with the highest coupling ratio (AL/EY). Furthermore, solar wind speed seems to play a key role in determining the type of activity in the magnetosphere. Slow solar wind is capable of maintaining steady convection. During fast solar wind streams the magnetosphere responds with loading–unloading cycles, represented by substorms during moderately active conditions and sawtooth events (or other storm-time activations) during geomagnetically active conditions.

Small-scale variations of helium abundance in different large-scale solar wind structures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Khokhlachev ◽  
Maria Riazantseva ◽  
Liudmila Rakhmanova ◽  
Yuri Yermolaev ◽  
Irina Lodkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Magnetic Clouds ◽  
Slow Solar Wind ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Plasma Stream ◽  
Helium Abundance ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Plasma Parameters

&lt;p&gt;The boundaries between large-scale solar wind streams are often accompanied by sharp changes in helium abundance. &amp;#160;Wherein the high value of relative helium abundance is known as a sign of some large-scale solar wind structures ( for example magnetic clouds). Unlike the steady slow solar wind where the helium abundance is rather stable and equals ~5%, in magnetic clouds its value can grow significantly up to 20% and more, and at the same time helium component becomes more variable. &amp;#160;In this paper we analyze the small-scale variations of solar wind plasma parameters, including the helium abundance variations in different large-scale solar wind streams, especially in magnetic clouds and Sheath regions before them. We use rather long intervals of simultaneous measurements at Spektr-R (spectrometer BMSW) and Wind (spectrometer 3DP) spacecrafts. &amp;#160;We choose the intervals with rather high correlation &amp;#160;level of plasma parameters as a whole to be sure that we are deal with the same plasma stream. &amp;#160;The intervals associated with different large scale-solar wind structures are selected by using of our catalog ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni/catalog/. For selected intervals we examine cross-correlation function for Spektr-R and Wind measurements &amp;#160;to reveal the local spatial inhomogeneities by helium abundance which can be observed only at one of spacecrafts, and we determine properties of ones. Such inhomogeneities can be generate by turbulence, which is typically getting more intense in the considered disturbed intervals in the solar wind. The work is supported by Russian Science Foundation grant 16-12-10062.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Superposed epoch analysis applied to large-amplitude travelling convection vortices

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 743-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lühr ◽  
M. Rother ◽  
T. Iyemori ◽  
T. L. Hansen ◽  
R. P. Lepping
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Large Amplitude ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Solar Rotation ◽  
Current System ◽  
Azimuthal Direction ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Northern Half ◽  
Epoch Analysis ◽  
Image Network

Abstract. For the six months from 1 October 1993 to 1 April 1994 the recordings of the IMAGE magnetometer network have been surveyed in a search for large-amplitude travelling convection vortices (TCVs). The restriction to large amplitudes (>100 nT) was chosen to ensure a proper detection of evens also during times of high activity. Readings of all stations of the northern half of the IMAGE network were employed to check the consistency of the ground signature with the notation of a dual-vortex structure moving in an azimuthal direction. Applying these stringent selection criteria we detected a total of 19 clear TCV events. The statistical properties of our selection resemble the expected characteristics of large-amplitude TCVs. New and unexpected results emerged from the superposed epoch analysis. TCVs tend to form during quiet intervals embedded in moderately active periods. The occurrence of events is not randomly distributed but rather shows a clustering around a few days. These clusters recur once or twice every 27 days. Within a storm cycle they show up five to seven days after the commencement. With regard to solar wind conditions, we see the events occurring in the middle of the IMF sector structure. Large-amplitude TCVs seem to require certain conditions to make solar wind transients 'geoeffective', which have the tendency to recur with the solar rotation period.Key words. Ionosphere (Aural ionosphere; Ionosphere- magnetosphere interactions) · Magnetospheric Physics (current system)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document