scholarly journals Do olivine crystallization temperatures faithfully record mantle temperature variability?

Author(s):  
Simon Matthews ◽  
Kevin Wong ◽  
Oliver Shorttle ◽  
Marie Edmonds ◽  
John Maclennan
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Matthews ◽  
Kevin Wong ◽  
Oliver Shorttle ◽  
Marie Edmonds ◽  
John Maclennan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Matthews ◽  
Kevin Wong ◽  
Oliver Shorttle ◽  
Marie Edmonds ◽  
John Maclennan

<p>Crystallisation temperatures of primitive olivine crystals have been widely used as both a proxy for, or an intermediate step in calculating, mantle temperatures. The olivine-spinel aluminium-exchange thermometer has been applied to many samples from mid-ocean ridges, ocean islands and large igneous provinces, yielding considerable variability in primitive olivine crystallisation temperatures. We supplement the existing data with new crystallisation temperature estimates for Hawaii, in the range 1282±21 - 1375±19°C.</p><p>Magmatic temperatures may be linked to mantle temperatures if the thermal changes during melting can be quantified. Melting lowers the temperature of co-existing magma and solid mantle, owing to the latent heat of melting. The magnitude of this cooling depends on melt fraction, itself controlled by mantle temperature, mantle lithology and lithosphere thickness. All of these parameters are likely to vary both spatially and temporally. For robust quantification of mantle temperature variability, the controls of lithosphere thickness and mantle lithology on crystallisation temperatures must be isolated.</p><p>We develop a multi-lithology melting model that can predict crystallisation temperature. The model allows mantle temperature, lithospheric thickness, and fractions of mantle lherzolite, pyroxenite and harzburgite to be varied. Inverting the model using a Bayesian Monte Carlo routine enables assessment of the extent to which crystallisation temperatures require variations in mantle temperature. We find that the high crystallisation temperatures seen at mantle plume localities do require high mantle temperatures. However, in the absence of further constraints on mantle lithology or melt productivity, we cannot robustly infer variable plume temperatures in either the present-day or throughout the phanerozoic. This work demonstrates the limit of petrological thermometers when other geodynamic parameters are poorly known.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
SANGEETA MANGESH ◽  
KRISHAN K. SAINI ◽  
CHOPRA P. K. ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Clapham ◽  
◽  
Sarah E. Greene ◽  
Alexander Farnsworth ◽  
Dan J. Lunt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Lu ◽  
Ritske S. Huismans

AbstractBreakup volcanism along rifted passive margins is highly variable in time and space. The factors controlling magmatic activity during continental rifting and breakup are not resolved and controversial. Here we use numerical models to investigate melt generation at rifted margins with contrasting rifting styles corresponding to those observed in natural systems. Our results demonstrate a surprising correlation of enhanced magmatism with margin width. This relationship is explained by depth-dependent extension, during which the lithospheric mantle ruptures earlier than the crust, and is confirmed by a semi-analytical prediction of melt volume over margin width. The results presented here show that the effect of increased mantle temperature at wide volcanic margins is likely over-estimated, and demonstrate that the large volumes of magmatism at volcanic rifted margin can be explained by depth-dependent extension and very moderate excess mantle potential temperature in the order of 50–80 °C, significantly smaller than previously suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document