scholarly journals Sudden Stratospheric Warming Formation in an Idealized General Circulation Model Using Three Types of Tropospheric Forcing

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Lindgren ◽  
A. Sheshadri ◽  
R. A. Plumb
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming

scholarly journals Strengthening of the Tropopause Inversion Layer during the 2009 Sudden Stratospheric Warming: A MERRA-2 Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1871-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Wargan ◽  
Lawrence Coy
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Inversion Layer ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Static Stability ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Residual Circulation ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Wave Forcing

Abstract The behavior of the tropopause inversion layer (TIL) during the 2009 sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is analyzed using NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), and short-term simulations with the MERRA-2 general circulation model. Consistent with previous studies, it is found that static stability in a shallow layer above the polar tropopause sharply increases following the SSW, leading to a strengthening of the high-latitude TIL. Simultaneously, the height of the thermal tropopause decreases by around 1 km. Similar behavior is also detected during other major SSW events between the years 2004 and 2013. Using an ensemble of general circulation model forecasts initialized from MERRA-2, it is demonstrated that the primary cause of the strengthening of the TIL is an increased convergence of the vertical component of the stratospheric residual circulation in response to an SSW-induced acceleration of the mean downward motion between 75° and 90°N. In addition, ~6% of the strengthening in 2009 is attributed to an enhanced anticyclonic circulation at the tropopause. A preliminary analysis indicates that during other recent SSW events there was a significant increase in the convergence of the vertical residual wind velocity throughout the middle and lower stratosphere. The static stability increase simulated by the model during the 2009 SSW is 60%–80% of that seen in MERRA-2. The underestimate is traced back to a tendency for the forecasts to underestimate the resolved planetary wave forcing on the stratosphere compared to the reanalysis.

scholarly journals Influence of the sudden stratospheric warming on quasi-2-day waves

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 4885-4896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Yang Gu ◽  
Han-Li Liu ◽  
Xiankang Dou ◽  
Tao Li
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Phase Speed ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Meridional Wind ◽  
Equatorial Region ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Middle Latitudes ◽  
Zonal Wave Number

Abstract. The influence of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) on a quasi-2-day wave (QTDW) with westward zonal wave number 3 (W3) is investigated using the Thermosphere–Ionosphere–Mesosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIME-GCM). The summer easterly jet below 90 km is strengthened during an SSW, which results in a larger refractive index and thus more favorable conditions for the propagation of W3. In the winter hemisphere, the Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux diagnostics indicate that the strong instabilities at middle and high latitudes in the mesopause region are important for the amplification of W3, which is weakened during SSW periods due to the deceleration or even reversal of the winter westerly winds. Nonlinear interactions between the W3 and the wave number 1 stationary planetary wave produce QTDW with westward zonal wave number 2 (W2). The meridional wind perturbations of the W2 peak in the equatorial region, while the zonal wind and temperature components maximize at middle latitudes. The EP flux diagnostics indicate that the W2 is capable of propagating upward in both winter and summer hemispheres, whereas the propagation of W3 is mostly confined to the summer hemisphere. This characteristic is likely due to the fact that the phase speed of W2 is larger, and therefore its waveguide has a broader latitudinal extension. The larger phase speed also makes W2 less vulnerable to dissipation and critical layer filtering by the background wind when propagating upward.

scholarly journals The Role of Eddy-Eddy Interactions in Sudden Stratospheric Warming Formation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Anders Lindgren ◽  
Aditi Sheshadri
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Wave Numbers ◽  
Tropospheric Heating ◽  
Wave Flux

Abstract. The effects of eddy-eddy interactions on sudden stratospheric warming formation are investigated using an idealized atmospheric general circulation model, in which tropospheric heating perturbations of zonal wave numbers 1 and 2 are used to produce planetary scale wave activity. Eddy-eddy interactions are removed at different vertical extents of the atmosphere in order to examine the sensitivity of stratospheric circulation to local changes in eddy-eddy interactions. We show that the effects of eddy-eddy interactions on sudden warming formation, including sudden warming frequencies, are strongly dependent on the wave number of the tropospheric forcing and the vertical levels where eddy-eddy interactions are removed. Significant changes in sudden warming frequencies are evident when eddy-eddy interactions are removed even when the lower stratospheric wave forcing does not change, highlighting the fact that the upper stratosphere is not a passive recipient of wave forcing from below. We find that while eddy-eddy interactions are required in the troposphere and lower stratosphere to produce displacements when wave number 2 heating is used, both splits and displacements can be produced without eddy-eddy interactions in the troposphere and lower stratosphere when the model is forced by wave number 1 heating. We suggest that the relative strengths of wave numbers 1 and 2 vertical wave flux entering the stratosphere largely determine the split and displacement ratios when wave number 2 forcing is used, but not wave number 1.

scholarly journals The role of wave–wave interactions in sudden stratospheric warming formation

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik A. Lindgren ◽  
Aditi Sheshadri
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Wave Interactions ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Tropospheric Heating ◽  
Wave Flux

Abstract. The effects of wave–wave interactions on sudden stratospheric warming formation are investigated using an idealized atmospheric general circulation model, in which tropospheric heating perturbations of zonal wave numbers 1 and 2 are used to produce planetary-scale wave activity. Zonal wave–wave interactions are removed at different vertical extents of the atmosphere in order to examine the sensitivity of stratospheric circulation to local changes in wave–wave interactions. We show that the effects of wave–wave interactions on sudden warming formation, including sudden warming frequencies, are strongly dependent on the wave number of the tropospheric forcing and the vertical levels where wave–wave interactions are removed. Significant changes in sudden warming frequencies are evident when wave–wave interactions are removed even when the lower-stratospheric wave forcing does not change, highlighting the fact that the upper stratosphere is not a passive recipient of wave forcing from below. We find that while wave–wave interactions are required in the troposphere and lower stratosphere to produce displacements when wave number 2 heating is used, both splits and displacements can be produced without wave–wave interactions in the troposphere and lower stratosphere when the model is forced by wave number 1 heating. We suggest that the relative strengths of wave number 1 and 2 vertical wave flux entering the stratosphere largely determine the split and displacement ratios when wave number 2 forcing is used but not wave number 1.

An eddy-permitting ocean-sea ice general circulation model (E3SMv0-HiLAT03): Description and evaluation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxu Zhang ◽  
Wilbert Weijer ◽  
Mathew Einar Maltrud ◽  
Carmela Veneziani ◽  
Nicole Jeffery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
General Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Circulation Model

Calculating the Natural Atmospheric Radiation Using the General Circulation Model of the Earth’s Lower and Middle Atmosphere

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 803-815
Author(s):  
B. N. Chetverushkin ◽  
I. V. Mingalev ◽  
E. A. Fedotova ◽  
K. G. Orlov ◽  
V. M. Chechetkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document