scholarly journals Effects of subducted seamounts on megathrust earthquake nucleation and rupture propagation

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfeng Yang ◽  
Yajing Liu ◽  
Jian Lin
Keyword(s):  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Megathrust Earthquake ◽  
Earthquake Nucleation

scholarly journals The 2010Mw8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake: Nucleation and rupture propagation controlled by a subducted topographic high

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (19) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Hicks ◽  
Andreas Rietbrock ◽  
Christian A. Haberland ◽  
Isabelle M. A. Ryder ◽  
Mark Simons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Earthquake Nucleation ◽  
Chile Earthquake ◽  
Topographic High

Effect of boundary friction on revere fault rupture propagation in centrifuge tests

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 106811
Author(s):  
Chaofan Yao ◽  
Jiro Takemura ◽  
Gaoyu Ma ◽  
Cong Dai ◽  
Zheli An
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Friction ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Fault Rupture ◽  
Centrifuge Tests ◽  
Fault Rupture Propagation

scholarly journals The stop-start control of seismicity by fault bends along the Main Himalayan Thrust

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharadha Sathiakumar ◽  
Sylvain Barbot
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazards ◽  
Geodetic Data ◽  
Source Mechanism ◽  
Seismogenic Zone ◽  
Seismic Cycle ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Alternative Models ◽  
Nepal Earthquake

AbstractThe Himalayan megathrust accommodates most of the relative convergence between the Indian and Eurasian plates, producing cycles of blind and surface-breaking ruptures. Elucidating the mechanics of down-dip segmentation of the seismogenic zone is key to better determine seismic hazards in the region. However, the geometry of the Himalayan megathrust and its impact on seismicity remains controversial. Here, we develop seismic cycle simulations tuned to the seismo-geodetic data of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake to better constrain the megathrust geometry and its role on the demarcation of partial ruptures. We show that a ramp in the middle of the seismogenic zone is required to explain the termination of the coseismic rupture and the source mechanism of up-dip aftershocks consistently. Alternative models with a wide décollement can only explain the mainshock. Fault structural complexities likely play an important role in modulating the seismic cycle, in particular, the distribution of rupture sizes. Fault bends are capable of both obstructing rupture propagation as well as behave as a source of seismicity and rupture initiation.

scholarly journals Earthquake nucleation and triggering on an optimally oriented fault

2013 ◽  
Vol 363 ◽  
pp. 231-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Tape ◽  
Michael West ◽  
Vipul Silwal ◽  
Natalia Ruppert
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Nucleation

scholarly journals The evolution of slope failures: mechanisms of rupture propagation

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Petley
Keyword(s):  
Slope Failure ◽  
Complex Stress ◽  
Basal Region ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Slope Failures ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Detailed Surface ◽  
Landslide Mass ◽  
Region Data ◽  
Detailed Assessment

Abstract. Forecasting the occurrence of large, catastrophic slope failures remains very problematic. It is clear that in order advance this field a greater understanding is needed of the processes through which failure occurs. In particular, there is a need to comprehend the processes through which a rupture develops and propagates through the slope, and the nature of the inter-relationship between the stress and strain states of the landslide mass. To this end, a detailed analysis has been undertaken of the movement records for the Selborme Cutting slope failure, in which failure was deliberately triggered through pore pressure elevation. The data demonstrate that it is possible to determine the processes occurring in the basal region of the landslide, and thus controlling the movement of the mass, from the surface movement patterns. In particular, it is clear that the process of rupture development and propagation has a unique signature, allowing the development of the rupture to be traced from detailed surface monitoring. For landslides undergoing first time failure through rupture propagation, this allows the prediction of the time of failure as per the "Saito" approach. It is shown that for such predictions to be reliable, data from a number of points across the landslide mass are needed. Interestingly, due to the complex stress regime in that region, data from the crown may not be appropriate for failure prediction. Based upon these results, the application of new techniques for the detailed assessment of spatial patterns of the development of strain may potentially allow a new insight into the development of rupture surfaces and may ultimately permit forecasting of the temporal occurrence of failure.

A comparison of two methods for earthquake source inversion using strong motion seismograms

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. Cohee ◽  
G. C. Beroza
Keyword(s):  
Rise Time ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Rupture Time ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Inversion Methods ◽  
Window Method

In this paper we compare two time-domain inversion methods that have been widely applied to the problem of modeling earthquake rupture using strong-motion seismograms. In the multi-window method, each point on the fault is allowed to rupture multiple times. This allows flexibility in the rupture time and hence the rupture velocity. Variations in the slip-velocity function are accommodated by variations in the slip amplitude in each time-window. The single-window method assumes that each point on the fault ruptures only once, when the rupture front passes. Variations in slip amplitude are allowed and variations in rupture velocity are accommodated by allowing the rupture time to vary. Because the multi-window method allows greater flexibility, it has the potential to describe a wider range of faulting behavior; however, with this increased flexibility comes an increase in the degrees of freedom and the solutions are comparatively less stable. We demonstrate this effect using synthetic data for a test model of the Mw 7.3 1992 Landers, California earthquake, and then apply both inversion methods to the actual recordings. The two approaches yield similar fits to the strong-motion data with different seismic moments indicating that the moment is not well constrained by strong-motion data alone. The slip amplitude distribution is similar using either approach, but important differences exist in the rupture propagation models. The single-window method does a better job of recovering the true seismic moment and the average rupture velocity. The multi-window method is preferable when rise time is strongly variable, but tends to overestimate the seismic moment. Both methods work well when the rise time is constant or short compared to the periods modeled. Neither approach can recover the temporal details of rupture propagation unless the distribution of slip amplitude is constrained by independent data.

Characterizing the Final Stage of Earthquake Nucleation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changrong He ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Qi-Fu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Final Stage ◽  
Earthquake Nucleation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document