scholarly journals Bridging onshore and offshore present-day kinematics of central and eastern Mediterranean: Implications for crustal dynamics and mantle flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugénie Pérouse ◽  
Nicolas Chamot-Rooke ◽  
Alain Rabaute ◽  
Pierre Briole ◽  
François Jouanne ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Steinberger ◽  
Douwe van Hinsbergen

<p>Identifying the geodynamic processes that trigger the formation of new subduction zones is key to understand what keeps the plate tectonic cycle going, and how plate tectonics once started. Here we discuss the possibility of plume-induced subduction initiation. Previously, our numerical modeling revealed that mantle upwelling and radial push induced by plume rise may trigger plate motion change, and plate divergence as much as 15-20 My prior to LIP eruption. Here we show that, depending on the geometry of plates, the distribution of cratonic keels and where the plume rises, it may also cause a plate rotation around a pole that is located close to the same plate boundary where the plume head impinges: If that occurs near one end of the plate boundary, an Euler pole of the rotation may form along that plate boundary, with extension on one side, and convergence on the other.  This concept is applied to the India-Africa plate boundary and the Morondova plume, which erupted around 90 Ma, but may have influenced plate motions as early as 105-110 Ma. If there is negligible friction, i.e. there is a pre-existing weak plate boundary, we estimate that the total amount of convergence generated in the northern part of the India-Africa plate boundary can exceed 100 km, which is widely thought to be sufficient to initiate forced, self-sustaining subduction. This may especially occur if the India continental craton acts like an “anchor” causing a comparatively southern location of the rotation pole of the India plate. Geology and paleomagnetism-based reconstructions of subduction initiation below ophiolites from Pakistan, through Oman, to the eastern Mediterranean reveal that E-W convergence around 105 Ma caused forced subduction initiation, and we tentatively postulate that this is triggered by Morondova plume head rise. Whether the timing of this convergence is appropriate to match observations on subduction initiation as early as 105 Ma depends on the timing of plume head arrival, which may predate eruption of the earliest volcanics. It also depends on whether a plume head already can exert substantial torque on the plate while it is still rising – for example, if the plate is coupled to the induced mantle flow by a thick craton.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Confal ◽  
Tuna Eken ◽  
Max Bezada ◽  
Manuele Faccenda ◽  
Erdinc Saygin ◽  
...  

<p>Upper mantle dynamics (e.g. subduction processes, slab roll-back, slab tearing and mantle upwelling) impact eastern Mediterranean region tectonics but a detailed understanding of the acting forces has remained elusive. Further progress requires more accurate measurements not just of the surface kinematics (from GPS) but also of indirect indicators of kinematics throughout the lithosphere and convecting upper mantle from seismology. A robust quantification of the magnitude, location and orientation of seismic anisotropy is a primary source of information to provide constraints on tectonic processes of the formation and evolution of the Anatolian Peninsula and the surrounding regions. Direct shear-wave splitting measurements in the Aegean to revealed mostly NNE-SSW oriented fast polarization directions, perpendicular to the trench and parallel to the mantle flow induced by the roll-back and large time delays (1.15-1.62 s) in the upper mantle. In southwestern Turkey the FPDs are more confusing and probably related to the tearing of the slab in the upper mantle underneath this region. With complex non-steady state 3D geodynamic modelling, the plate movement, mantle flow, anisotropy and SKS splitting parameters for the last 20-30 Ma in the regional subduction system of the eastern Mediterranean and Anatolia were calculated. The model shows that tearing underneath southwestern Turkey, a break-off in the collitional regime of eastern Anatolia as well as the retreat of the slab in the Aegean influence on the strength and direction of the mantle flow and anisotropy. At last a P-wave tomography study of the Eastern Mediterranean region, focusing on the upper mantle with a large data set was done. Since anisotropy is present in the region especially due to the active subduction system, travel times were corrected by including anisotropy as an aprori constraint, from the numerical model and SKS splitting parameters. In isotropic inversions as well as the ones corrected for anisotropy, tears in the northern Hellenic slab, underneath southwestern Turkey and in the Cyprian slab can be seen. Spatially large first order velocity perturbations are stable and similar in isotropic and anisotropy corrected models. But differences up to 2% and small geometrical discrepancies beween the models show the importance of including anisotropy to P-wave tomographies.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document