scholarly journals Forest carbon uptake recovers from modest tree losses

Eos ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Colin Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake

scholarly journals Snowmelt‐Driven Trade‐Offs Between Early and Late Season Productivity Negatively Impact Forest Carbon Uptake During Drought

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 3087-3096 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Knowles ◽  
Noah P. Molotch ◽  
Ernesto Trujillo ◽  
Marcy E. Litvak
Keyword(s):  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Late Season ◽  
Trade Offs

scholarly journals High atmospheric demand for water can limit forest carbon uptake and transpiration as severely as dry soil

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (18) ◽  
pp. 9686-9695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Sulman ◽  
D. Tyler Roman ◽  
Koong Yi ◽  
Lixin Wang ◽  
Richard P. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Dry Soil

Seasonal controls of canopy chlorophyll content on forest carbon uptake: Implications for GPP modeling

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (8) ◽  
pp. 1576-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Croft ◽  
J. M. Chen ◽  
N. J. Froelich ◽  
B. Chen ◽  
R. M. Staebler
Keyword(s):  
Chlorophyll Content ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake

scholarly journals Synoptic Meteorology Explains Temperate Forest Carbon Uptake

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina A. Randazzo ◽  
Anna M. Michalak ◽  
Ankur R. Desai
Keyword(s):  
Temperate Forest ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Synoptic Meteorology

Evaluation of forest carbon uptake in South Korea using the national flux tower network, remote sensing, and data-driven technology

2021 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 108653
Author(s):  
Sungsik Cho ◽  
Minseok Kang ◽  
Kazuhito Ichii ◽  
Joon Kim ◽  
Jong-Hwan Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Flux Tower

Contributions of coniferous and broad-leaved species to temperate forest carbon uptake: a bottom-up approach

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Catovsky ◽  
F A Bazzaz
Keyword(s):  
Species Composition ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Red Oak ◽  
Red Maple ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Photosynthetic Rates ◽  
Uptake Rates ◽  
Leaf Level ◽  
Broad Leaved Species

Changes in forest species composition could influence ecosystem carbon uptake rates. To understand how species differed in their contributions to canopy photosynthesis, we investigated how the dominant coniferous (eastern hemlock, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) and broad-leaved (northern red oak, Quercus rubra L.; red maple, Acer rubrum L.) species in a central Massachusetts forest differed in canopy carbon uptake rates. We considered what factors influenced in situ leaf-level photosynthesis and then used a bottom-up summation approach to estimate species-specific total canopy carbon uptake rates. Variation in canopy light strongly influenced leaf-level photosynthetic rates: sunlit leaves had significantly higher rates than shaded leaves, and photosynthesis increased with canopy height. Species also differed in leaf-level photosynthetic rates, with the broad-leaved species having up to twofold higher rates than hemlock. Within hemlock, needles older than 2 years had lower photosynthesis than younger needles. Variation in leaf-level photosynthesis scaled up to influence canopy carbon uptake rates. Red oak consistently had the highest canopy photosynthetic rates, while through the season, hemlock's relative contribution to carbon flux increased and that of red maple decreased. Thus, in such mixed forests, future changes in species composition could have substantial impacts on forest carbon dynamics, particularly if red oak is the primary broad-leaved species to expand at the expense of hemlock.

Informing climate models with rapid chamber measurements of forest carbon uptake

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 2130-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Metcalfe ◽  
Daniel Ricciuto ◽  
Sari Palmroth ◽  
Catherine Campbell ◽  
Vaughan Hurry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Carbon Uptake ◽  
Chamber Measurements
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document