scholarly journals Multiscale assimilation of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS snow water equivalent and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer snow cover fraction observations in northern Colorado

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy ◽  
Rolf H. Reichle ◽  
Kristi R. Arsenault ◽  
Paul R. Houser ◽  
Sujay Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Snow Cover Fraction ◽  
Northern Colorado ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Snow Simulations from the Community Land Model, Version 4 (CLM4)

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ally M. Toure ◽  
Matthew Rodell ◽  
Zong-Liang Yang ◽  
Hiroko Beaudoing ◽  
Edward Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Average Bias ◽  
Community Land Model ◽  
Model Version ◽  
Snow Cover Extent ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract This paper evaluates the simulation of snow by the Community Land Model, version 4 (CLM4), the land model component of the Community Earth System Model, version 1.0.4 (CESM1.0.4). CLM4 was run in an offline mode forced with the corrected land-only replay of the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-Land) and the output was evaluated for the period from January 2001 to January 2011 over the Northern Hemisphere poleward of 30°N. Simulated snow-cover fraction (SCF), snow depth, and snow water equivalent (SWE) were compared against a set of observations including the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) SCF, the Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) snow cover, the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) daily snow analysis products, snow depth from the National Weather Service Cooperative Observer (COOP) program, and Snowpack Telemetry (SNOTEL) SWE observations. CLM4 SCF was converted into snow-cover extent (SCE) to compare with MODIS SCE. It showed good agreement, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91 and an average bias of −1.54 × 102 km2. Overall, CLM4 agreed well with IMS snow cover, with the percentage of correctly modeled snow–no snow being 94%. CLM4 snow depth and SWE agreed reasonably well with the CMC product, with the average bias (RMSE) of snow depth and SWE being 0.044 m (0.19 m) and −0.010 m (0.04 m), respectively. CLM4 underestimated SNOTEL SWE and COOP snow depth. This study demonstrates the need to improve the CLM4 snow estimates and constitutes a benchmark against which improvement of the model through data assimilation can be measured.

scholarly journals Assimilating MODIS and AMSR-E Snow Observations in a Snow Evolution Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1475-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Fletcher ◽  
Glen E. Liston ◽  
Christopher A. Hiemstra ◽  
Steven D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Evolution Model ◽  
The South ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
The North ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract In this paper four simple computationally inexpensive, direct insertion data assimilation schemes are presented, and evaluated, to assimilate Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) snow cover, which is a binary observation, and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (EOS) (AMSR-E) snow water equivalent (SWE) observations, which are at a coarser resolution than MODIS, into a numerical snow evolution model. The four schemes are 1) assimilate MODIS snow cover on its own with an arbitrary 0.01 m added to the model cells if there is a difference in snow cover; 2) iteratively change the model SWE values to match the AMSR-E equivalent value; 3) AMSR-E scheme with MODIS observations constraining which cells can be changed, when both sets of observations are available; and 4) MODIS-only scheme when the AMSR-E observations are not available, otherwise scheme 3. These schemes are used in the winter of 2006/07 over the southeast corner of Colorado and the tri-state area: Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska. It is shown that the inclusion of MODIS data enables the model in the north domain to have a 15% improvement in number of days with a less than 10% disagreement with the MODIS observation 24 h later and approximately 5% for the south domain. It is shown that the AMSR-E scheme has more of an impact in the south domain than the north domain. The assimilation results are also compared to station snow-depth data in both domains, where there is up-to-a-factor-of-5 underestimation of snow depth by the assimilation schemes compared with the station data but the snow evolution is fairly consistent.

scholarly journals Satellite monitoring of blue-ice extent near Byrd Glacier, Antarctica

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. Brown ◽  
Ted A. Scambos
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Satellite Monitoring ◽  
Landsat Images ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Summer Maximum ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Snowfall Event ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Seasonal And Interannual Variations

AbstractWe use satellite images to track seasonal and interannual variations in blue-ice extent over the past 30 years near Byrd Glacier on the East Antarctic plateau. The study areas have low slope and few nearby nunataks, which may increase their climate sensitivity. A threshold-based algorithm sensitive to snow grain-size is used to analyze 56 Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images over three recent summer seasons. Seasonal blue-ice exposure grows rapidly in late spring, and peaks by late December. Exposure is relatively constant between late December and mid-January, then declines in February. We interpret this cycle as due to removal and re-accumulation of patchy snow. Interannual changes in blue-ice area may be estimated by tracking the near-constant summer maximum extent period. Fifteen mid-summer Landsat images, spanning 1974–2002, were analyzed to determine long-term variations. Interannual area changes are 10–30%; however, the MODIS data revealed that the exposed blue-ice area can be sharply reduced for up to 2 weeks after a snowfall event; and in the 2001/02 season, patchy snow cover persisted for the entire summer. The combination of MODIS seasonal and Landsat interannual data indicates that blue-ice areas can be climate-sensitive. The strong feedback between snow cover and surface energy balance implies that blue-ice areas could rapidly decrease due to climate-related increases in snowfall or reduced ablation.

A Study on Flood Forecasting in the Upper Indus Basin Considering Snow and Glacier Meltwater

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Liu ◽  
Morimasa Tsuda ◽  
Yoichi Iwami ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Cover ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
Indus Basin ◽  
Maximum Magnitude ◽  
Upper Indus Basin ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Daily Discharge ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Tarbela Dam

This study considered glacier and snow meltwater by using the degree–day method with ground-based air temperature and fractional glacier/snow cover to simulate discharge at Skardu, Partab Bridge (P. Bridge), and Tarbela Dam in the Upper Indus Basin during the monsoon season, from the middle of June to the end of September. The optimum parameter set was determined and validated in 2010 and 2012. The simulated discharge with glaciermelt and snowmelt could capture the variations of the observed discharge in terms of peak volume and timing, particularly in the early monsoon season. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) daily and eight-day snow cover products were applied and recommended with proper settings for application. This study also investigated the simulations with snow packs instead of daily snow cover, which was found to approach the maximum magnitude of observed discharge even from the uppermost station, Skardu.This study estimated the glacier and snow meltwater contribution at Skardu, Partab Bridge, and Tarbela as 43.2–65.2%, 22.0–29.3%, and 6.3–19.9% of average daily discharge during the monsoon season, respectively. In addition, this study evaluated the main source of simulation discrepancies and concluded that the methodology proposed in the study worked well with proper precipitation.

scholarly journals Estimating spatial distribution of daily snow depth with kriging methods: combination of MODIS snow cover area data and ground-based observations

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 4997-5020 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Huang ◽  
H. W. Wang ◽  
J. L. Hou
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Snow Cover ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Western China ◽  
Kriging Interpolation ◽  
Snow Cover Area ◽  
Smoothing Effects ◽  
Moderate Resolution ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. Accurately measuring the spatial distribution of the snow depth is difficult because stations are sparse, particularly in western China. In this study, we develop a novel scheme that produces a reasonable spatial distribution of the daily snow depth using kriging interpolation methods. These methods combine the effects of elevation with information from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) snow cover area (SCA) products. The scheme uses snow-free pixels in MODIS SCA images with clouds removed to identify virtual stations, or areas with zero snow depth, to compensate for the scarcity and uneven distribution of stations. Four types of kriging methods are tested: ordinary kriging (OK), universal kriging (UK), ordinary co-kriging (OCK), and universal co-kriging (UCK). These methods are applied to daily snow depth observations at 50 meteorological stations in northern Xinjiang Province, China. The results show that the spatial distribution of snow depth can be accurately reconstructed using these kriging methods. The added virtual stations improve the distribution of the snow depth and reduce the smoothing effects of the kriging process. The best performance is achieved by the OK method in cases with shallow snow cover and by the UCK method when snow cover is widespread.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document