scholarly journals A climate sensitivity estimate using Bayesian fusion of instrumental observations and an Earth System model

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (D4) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Olson ◽  
Ryan Sriver ◽  
Marlos Goes ◽  
Nathan M. Urban ◽  
H. Damon Matthews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Instrumental Observations ◽  
Bayesian Fusion ◽  
Sensitivity Estimate

scholarly journals High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (14) ◽  
pp. 8329-8337 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gettelman ◽  
C. Hannay ◽  
J. T. Bacmeister ◽  
R. B. Neale ◽  
A. G. Pendergrass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Version ◽  
Community Earth System Model

Spatial Decomposition of Climate Feedbacks in the Community Earth System Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3544-3561 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gettelman ◽  
J. E. Kay ◽  
J. T. Fasullo
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Cloud Feedback ◽  
System Model ◽  
Storm Tracks ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Cloud Feedbacks ◽  
Stratiform Clouds ◽  
Community Earth System Model

Abstract An ensemble of simulations from different versions of the Community Atmosphere Model in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) is used to investigate the processes responsible for the intermodel spread in climate sensitivity. In the CESM simulations, the climate sensitivity spread is primarily explained by shortwave cloud feedbacks on the equatorward flank of the midlatitude storm tracks. Shortwave cloud feedbacks have been found to explain climate sensitivity spread in previous studies, but the location of feedback differences was in the subtropics rather than in the storm tracks as identified in CESM. The cloud-feedback relationships are slightly stronger in the winter hemisphere. The spread in climate sensitivity in this study is related both to the cloud-base state and to the cloud feedbacks. Simulated climate sensitivity is correlated with cloud-fraction changes on the equatorward side of the storm tracks, cloud condensate in the storm tracks, and cloud microphysical state on the poleward side of the storm tracks. Changes in the extent and water content of stratiform clouds (that make up cloud feedback) are regulated by the base-state vertical velocity, humidity, and deep convective mass fluxes. Within the storm tracks, the cloud-base state affects the cloud response to CO2-induced temperature changes and alters the cloud feedbacks, contributing to climate sensitivity spread within the CESM ensemble.

scholarly journals Evaluation and climate sensitivity of the PlaSim v.17 Earth System Model coupled with ocean model components of different complexity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Angeloni ◽  
Elisa Palazzi ◽  
Jost von Hardenberg
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Ice Cover ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Feedback Mechanisms

Abstract. A set of experiments is performed with coupled atmosphere-ocean configurations of the Planet Simulator, an Earth-system Model of Intermediate Complexity (EMIC), in order to identify under which set of parameters the model output better agrees with observations and reanalyses of the present climate. Different model configurations are explored, in which the atmospheric module of PlaSim is coupled with two possible ocean models, either a simple mixed-layer (ML) ocean with a diffusive transport parameterization or a more complex dynamical Large-Scale Geostrophic (LSG) ocean, together with a sea-ice module. In order to achieve a more realistic representation of present-day climate, we performed a preliminary tuning of the oceanic horizontal diffusion coefficient for the ML ocean and of the vertical oceanic diffusion profile when using LSG. Model runs under present-day conditions are compared, in terms of surface air temperature, sea surface temperature, sea ice cover, precipitation, radiation fluxes, ocean circulation, with a reference climate from observations and reanalyses. Our results indicate that, in all configurations, coupled PlaSim configurations are able to reproduce the main characteristics of the climate system, with the exception of the Southern Ocean region in the PlaSim-LSG model, where surface air and sea surface temperatures are warm-biased and sea ice cover is by consequence highly underestimated. The resulting sets of tuned parameters are used to perform a series of model equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) experiments, with the aim to identify the main mechanisms contributing to differences between the different configurations and leading to elevated values of ECS. In fact, high resulting global ECS values are found, positioned in the upper range of CMIP5 and recent CMIP6 estimates. Our analysis shows that a significant contribution to ECS is given by the sea-ice feedback mechanisms and by details of the parameterization of meridional oceanic heat transport. In particular, the configurations using a diffusive heat transport in the mixed layer present an important sensitivity in terms of radiative forcing to changes in sea-ice cover, leading to an important contribution of sea-ice feedback mechanisms to ECS.

Modelling choices with regard to aerosol-cloud interactions and their impact on effective climate sensitivity in the NorESM2 model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Undorf ◽  
Frida Bender
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Aerosol Cloud ◽  
Model Version ◽  
Aerosol Cloud Interactions

<p>Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACIs) continue to be subject to much uncertainty, supporting a large set of parametric and structural variants of a global climate or Earth System Model (ESM), especially regarding its aerosol and cloud microphysics components. This structural model uncertainty is relevant not only for the quantification of the climate response to anthropogenic aerosols: Because aerosol-cloud interactions are at the core of cloud and precipitation formation, they might also affect model-simulated cloud adjustments and feedbacks in response to greenhouse gases, and hence the model’s effective climate sensitivity (ECS). In-situ observations, satellite retrievals, and large-eddy simulations point to discrepancies between the effects of aerosol-cloud interactions in the real world and as modelled in ESMs, with potential implications for the model range also for ECS. </p><p>Here, we explore how different choices in ACI modelling affect the model’s ECS. For this case study the CMIP6-generation Norwegian Earth System Model version 2 (NorESM2) is used, which has a sophisticated aerosol module and in its ‘default’ version contributed to the CMIP6 suite relatively weak positive cloud feedbacks compared to the other models within the 150 years used to calculate the regression-based ECS (EffCS). The climate change feedback and hence ECS of each modified model version compared to that of the default one is estimated by prescribing a uniform rise of 4K in the sea-surface temperature boundary conditions and evaluating the resulting top-of-atmosphere imbalance difference. A similar or better representation of present-day mean climate in general and ACI effects in particular is ensured by comparing a suite of evaluation metrics with their observationally derived pendants and results from the literature.</p><p>The ACI effects and relevant model-observation discrepancies targeted with the model modifications include models’ excessive cloud brightening over stratocumulus regions compared to satellite products, excessive increase in liquid water path associated with increased aerosol amount, and model bias in the climatological fraction between supercooled liquid water and cloud ice in mixed-phase clouds. For each of these, experiments with multiple combinations of modifications in the model code are analysed, exemplifying the numerous different processes and parameters that together determine the model response. The findings complement approaches to explore models’ parameter spaces systematically by informing the choices physically and restricting the modifications not only to parametric changes. The range of models obtained sets the default NorESM2 version, with its ECS being part of the CMIP6 ensemble, into the context of ACI uncertainty, informs on the so far possibly underappreciated relevance of ACIs for climate change beyond anthropogenic aerosols, and suggests alternative parameterisations for future ‘default’ model versions.</p><div>2.11.0.0</div>

scholarly journals Role of AMOC in Transient Climate Response to Greenhouse Gas Forcing in Two Coupled Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (14) ◽  
pp. 5845-5859
Author(s):  
Aixue Hu ◽  
Luke Van Roekel ◽  
Wilbert Weijer ◽  
Oluwayemi A. Garuba ◽  
Wei Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Upper Ocean ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Model Version ◽  
The Mean

AbstractAs the greenhouse gas concentrations increase, a warmer climate is expected. However, numerous internal climate processes can modulate the primary radiative warming response of the climate system to rising greenhouse gas forcing. Here the particular internal climate process that we focus on is the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), an important global-scale feature of ocean circulation that serves to transport heat and other scalars, and we address the question of how the mean strength of AMOC can modulate the transient climate response. While the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) and the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SM1) have very similar equilibrium/effective climate sensitivity, our analysis suggests that a weaker AMOC contributes in part to the higher transient climate response to a rising greenhouse gas forcing seen in E3SM1 by permitting a faster warming of the upper ocean and a concomitant slower warming of the subsurface ocean. Likewise the stronger AMOC in CESM2 by permitting a slower warming of the upper ocean leads in part to a smaller transient climate response. Thus, while the mean strength of AMOC does not affect the equilibrium/effective climate sensitivity, it is likely to play an important role in determining the transient climate response on the centennial time scale.

scholarly journals Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6165-6200
Author(s):  
Øyvind Seland ◽  
Mats Bentsen ◽  
Dirk Olivié ◽  
Thomas Toniazzo ◽  
Ada Gjermundsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Momentum Conservation ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The second version of the coupled Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) is presented and evaluated. NorESM2 is based on the second version of the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and shares with CESM2 the computer code infrastructure and many Earth system model components. However, NorESM2 employs entirely different ocean and ocean biogeochemistry models. The atmosphere component of NorESM2 (CAM-Nor) includes a different module for aerosol physics and chemistry, including interactions with cloud and radiation; additionally, CAM-Nor includes improvements in the formulation of local dry and moist energy conservation, in local and global angular momentum conservation, and in the computations for deep convection and air–sea fluxes. The surface components of NorESM2 have minor changes in the albedo calculations and to land and sea-ice models. We present results from simulations with NorESM2 that were carried out for the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Two versions of the model are used: one with lower (∼ 2∘) atmosphere–land resolution and one with medium (∼ 1∘) atmosphere–land resolution. The stability of the pre-industrial climate and the sensitivity of the model to abrupt and gradual quadrupling of CO2 are assessed, along with the ability of the model to simulate the historical climate under the CMIP6 forcings. Compared to observations and reanalyses, NorESM2 represents an improvement over previous versions of NorESM in most aspects. NorESM2 appears less sensitive to greenhouse gas forcing than its predecessors, with an estimated equilibrium climate sensitivity of 2.5 K in both resolutions on a 150-year time frame; however, this estimate increases with the time window and the climate sensitivity at equilibration is much higher. We also consider the model response to future scenarios as defined by selected Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project defined under CMIP6. Under the four scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5), the warming in the period 2090–2099 compared to 1850–1879 reaches 1.3, 2.2, 3.0, and 3.9 K in NorESM2-LM, and 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, and 3.9 K in NorESM-MM, robustly similar in both resolutions. NorESM2-LM shows a rather satisfactory evolution of recent sea-ice area. In NorESM2-LM, an ice-free Arctic Ocean is only avoided in the SSP1-2.6 scenario.

Mechanisms affecting equilibrium climate sensitivity in the PlaSim Earth System Model with different ocean model configurations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Angeloni ◽  
Elisa Palazzi ◽  
Jost von Hardenberg
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity

<p>The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of a state-of-the-art Earth System Model of intermediate complexity, the Planet Simulator (PlaSim), is determined under three tuned configurations, in which the model is coupled with a simple Mixed Layer (ML) or with the full 3D Large Scale Geostrophic (LSG) ocean model, at two horizontal resolutions, T21 (600 km) and T42 (300 km). Sensitivity experiments with doubled and quadrupled CO<sub>2</sub> were run, using either dynamic or prescribed sea ice. The resulting ECS using dynamic sea ice is 6.3 K for PlaSim-ML T21, 5.4 K for PlaSim-ML T42 and a much smaller 4.2 K for PlaSim-LSG T21. A systematic comparison between simulations with dynamic and prescribed sea ice helps to identify a strong contribution of sea ice to the value of the feedback parameter and of the climate sensitivity. Additionally, Antarctic sea ice is underestimated in PlaSim-LSG leading to a further reduction of ECS when the LSG ocean is used. The ECS of ML experiments is generally large compared with current estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5 models and other EMICs: a relevant observation is that the choice of the ML horizontal diffusion coefficient, and therefore of the parameterized meridional heat transport and in turn the resulting equator-poles temperature gradient, plays an important role in controlling the ECS of the PlaSim-ML configurations. This observation should be possibly taken into account when evaluating ECS estimates in models with a mixed layer ocean. The configuration of PlaSim with the LSG ocean shows very different AMOC regimes, including 250-year oscillations and a complete shutdown of meridional transport, which depend on the ocean vertical diffusion profile and the CO<sub>2</sub> forcing conditions. These features can be explored in the framework of tipping points: the simplified and parameterized form of the climate system components included in PlaSim makes this model a suitable tool to study the transitions occurring in the Earth system in presence of critical points.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document