Abstract. MODIS land surface temperatures in Antarctica were processed in order to produce a gridded data set at 25 km resolution, spanning the period 2000–2011 at an hourly time-step. The AQUA and TERRA orbits and MODIS swath width, combined with frequent clear-sky conditions, lead to very high availability of quality-controlled observations: on average, hourly data are available 14 h per day at the grid points around the South Pole and more than 9 over a large area of the Antarctic Plateau. Processed MODIS land surface temperatures, referred to hereinafter as MODIS Ts, were compared with in situ hourly measurements of surface temperature collected over the entire year 2009 by 7 stations from the BSRN and AWS networks. In spite of an occasional failure in the detection of clouds, MODIS Ts exhibit a good performance, with a bias ranging from −1.8 to 0.1 °C and errors ranging from 2.2 to 4.8 °C root mean square at the 5 stations located on the plateau. These results show that MODIS Ts can be used as a precise and accurate reference to test other surface temperature data sets. Here, we evaluate the performance of surface temperature in the ERA-Interim reanalysis. During conditions detected as cloud-free by MODIS, ERA-Interim shows a widespread warm bias in Antarctica in every season, ranging from +3 to +6 °C on the plateau. This confirms a recent study which showed that the largest discrepancies in 2 m air temperature between ERA-Interim and the HadCRUT4 data set occur in Antarctica. A comparison with in situ surface temperature shows that this bias is not strictly limited to clear-sky conditions. A detailed comparison with stand-alone simulations by the Crocus snowpack model, forced by ERA-Interim, and with the ERA-Interim/land simulations, shows that the warm bias may be due primarily to an overestimation of the surface turbulent fluxes in very stable conditions. Numerical experiments with Crocus show this is likely due to an overestimation of the surface exchange coefficients under very stable conditions.
Evaluation of “all weather” microwave-derived land surface temperatures with in situ CEOP measurements