scholarly journals Processes that generate and deplete liquid water and snow in thin midlevel mixed-phase clouds

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (D12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Smith ◽  
Vincent E. Larson ◽  
Jianguo Niu ◽  
J. Adam Kankiewicz ◽  
Lawrence D. Carey
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Understanding the Extratropical Liquid Water Path Feedback in Mixed-Phase Clouds with an Idealized Global Climate Model

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-48
Author(s):  
Yi Ming
Keyword(s):  
Water Content ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Cloud Water ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Water Path ◽  
Cloud Water Content ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract A negative shortwave cloud feedback associated with higher extratropical liquid water content in mixed-phase clouds is a common feature of global warming simulations, and multiple mechanisms have been hypothesized. A set of process-level experiments performed with an idealized global climate model (a dynamical core with passive water and cloud tracers and full Rotstayn-Klein single-moment microphysics) show that the common picture of the liquid water path (LWP) feedback in mixed-phase clouds being controlled by the amount of ice susceptible to phase change is not robust. Dynamic condensate processes—rather than static phase partitioning—directly change with warming, with varied impacts on liquid and ice amounts. Here, three principal mechanisms are responsible for the LWP response, namely higher adiabatic cloud water content, weaker liquid-to-ice conversion through the Bergeron-Findeisen process, and faster melting of ice and snow to rain. Only melting is accompanied by a substantial loss of ice, while the adiabatic cloud water content increase gives rise to a net increase in ice water path (IWP) such that total cloud water also increases without an accompanying decrease in precipitation efficiency. Perturbed parameter experiments with a wide range of climatological LWP and IWP demonstrate a strong dependence of the LWP feedback on the climatological LWP and independence from the climatological IWP and supercooled liquid fraction. This idealized setup allows for a clean isolation of mechanisms and paints a more nuanced picture of the extratropical mixed-phase cloud water feedback than simple phase change.

scholarly journals The potential influence of Asian and African mineral dust on ice, mixed-phase and liquid water clouds

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 4027-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Wiacek ◽  
T. Peter ◽  
U. Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mineral Dust ◽  
Dust Emission ◽  
Ice Nucleation ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
Dust Particles ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Cloud Processing ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. This modelling study explores the availability of mineral dust particles as ice nuclei for interactions with ice, mixed-phase and liquid water clouds, also tracking the particles' history of cloud-processing. We performed 61 320 one-week forward trajectory calculations originating near the surface of major dust emitting regions in Africa and Asia using high-resolution meteorological analysis fields for the year 2007. Without explicitly modelling dust emission and deposition processes, dust-bearing trajectories were assumed to be those coinciding with known dust emission seasons. We found that dust emissions from Asian deserts lead to a higher potential for interactions with high clouds, despite being the climatologically much smaller dust emission source. This is due to Asian regions experiencing significantly more ascent than African regions, with strongest ascent in the Asian Taklimakan desert at ~25%, ~40% and 10% of trajectories ascending to 300 hPa in spring, summer and fall, respectively. The specific humidity at each trajectory's starting point was transported in a Lagrangian manner and relative humidities with respect to water and ice were calculated in 6-h steps downstream, allowing us to estimate the formation of liquid, mixed-phase and ice clouds. Practically none of the simulated air parcels reached regions where homogeneous ice nucleation can take place (T≲−40 °C) along trajectories that have not experienced water saturation first. By far the largest fraction of cloud forming trajectories entered conditions of mixed-phase clouds, where mineral dust will potentially exert the biggest influence. The majority of trajectories also passed through regions supersaturated with respect to ice but subsaturated with respect to water, where "warm" (T≳−40 °C) ice clouds may form prior to supercooled water or mixed-phase clouds. The importance of "warm" ice clouds and the general influence of dust in the mixed-phase cloud region are highly uncertain due to considerable scatter in recent laboratory data from ice nucleation experiments, which we briefly review in this work. For "classical" cirrus-forming temperatures, our results show that only mineral dust IN that underwent mixed-phase cloud-processing previously are likely to be relevant, and, therefore, we recommend further systematic studies of immersion mode ice nucleation on mineral dust suspended in atmospherically relevant coatings.

scholarly journals The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 8807-8828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Lohmann ◽  
David Neubauer
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Supercooled Liquid ◽  
Cloud Feedback ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. How clouds change in a warmer climate remains one of the largest uncertainties for the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). While a large spread in the cloud feedback arises from low-level clouds, it was recently shown that mixed-phase clouds are also important for ECS. If mixed-phase clouds in the current climate contain too few supercooled cloud droplets, too much ice will change to liquid water in a warmer climate. As shown by Tan et al. (2016), this overestimates the negative cloud-phase feedback and underestimates ECS in the CAM global climate model (GCM). Here we use the newest version of the ECHAM6-HAM2 GCM to investigate the importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for ECS. Although we also considerably underestimate the fraction of supercooled liquid water globally in the reference version of the ECHAM6-HAM2 GCM, we do not obtain increases in ECS in simulations with more supercooled liquid water in the present-day climate, different from the findings by Tan et al. (2016). We hypothesize that it is not the global supercooled liquid water fraction that matters, but only how well low- and mid-level mixed-phase clouds with cloud-top temperatures in the mixed-phase temperature range between 0 and −35 ∘C that are not shielded by higher-lying ice clouds are simulated. These occur most frequently in midlatitudes, in particular over the Southern Ocean where they determine the amount of absorbed shortwave radiation. In ECHAM6-HAM2 the amount of absorbed shortwave radiation over the Southern Ocean is only significantly overestimated if all clouds below 0 ∘C consist exclusively of ice. Only in this simulation is ECS significantly smaller than in all other simulations and the cloud optical depth feedback is the dominant cloud feedback. In all other simulations, the cloud optical depth feedback is weak and changes in cloud feedbacks associated with cloud amount and cloud-top pressure dominate the overall cloud feedback. However, apart from the simulation with only ice below 0 ∘C, differences in the overall cloud feedback are not translated into differences in ECS in our model. This insensitivity to the cloud feedback in our model is explained with compensating effects in the clear sky.

scholarly journals The importance of mixed-phase clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6-HAM2

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Lohmann ◽  
David Neubauer
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Supercooled Liquid ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. Clouds are important in the climate system because of their large influence on the radiation budget. On the one hand, they scatter solar radiation and with that cool the climate. On the other hand, they absorb and re-emit terrestrial radiation, which causes a warming. How clouds change in a warmer climate is one of the largest uncertainties for the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). While a large spread in the cloud feedback arises from low-level clouds, it was recently shown that also mixed-phase clouds are important for ECS. If mixed-phase clouds in the current climate contain too few supercooled cloud droplets, too much ice will change to liquid water in a warmer climate. As shown by Tan et al. (2016), this overestimates the negative cloud phase feedback and underestimates ECS in the CAM global climate model (GCM). Here we are using the newest version of the ECHAM6-HAM2 GCM to investigate the importance of mixed-phase clouds for ECS. Although we also considerably underestimate the fraction of supercooled liquid water globally in the reference version of ECHAM6-HAM2 GCM, we do not obtain increases in ECS in simulations with more supercooled liquid water in the present-day climate, contrary to the findings by Tan et al. (2016). We hypothesize that it is not the global supercooled liquid water fraction that matters, but only how well low- and mid-level mixed-phase clouds with cloud top temperatures in the mixed-phase temperature range between 0 and −35 ºC are simulated. These occur most frequent in mid-latitudes, in particular over the Southern Ocean where they determine the amount of absorbed shortwave radiation. In ECHAM6-HAM2 the amount of absorbed shortwave radiation over the Southern Ocean is only overestimated if all clouds below 0 ºC consist exclusively of ice and only in this simulation is ECS is significantly smaller than in all other simulations. Hence, the negative cloud phase feedback seems to be important only if the optically thin low- and mid-level mid-latitude clouds have the wrong phase (ice instead of liquid water) in the absence of overlying clouds. In all other simulations, changes in cloud feedbacks associated with cloud amount and cloud top pressure, dominate.

scholarly journals The potential influence of Asian and African mineral dust on ice, mixed-phase and liquid water clouds

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 8649-8667 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Wiacek ◽  
T. Peter ◽  
U. Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mineral Dust ◽  
Dust Emission ◽  
Ice Nucleation ◽  
Transport Processes ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Cloud Processing ◽  
Ice Nuclei ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. This modelling study explores the availability of mineral dust particles as ice nuclei for interactions with ice, mixed-phase and liquid water clouds, also tracking the particles' history of cloud-processing. We performed 61 320 one-week forward trajectory calculations originating near the surface of major dust emitting regions in Africa and Asia using high-resolution meteorological analysis fields for the year 2007. Dust-bearing trajectories were assumed to be those coinciding with known dust emission seasons, without explicitly modelling dust emission and deposition processes. We found that dust emissions from Asian deserts lead to a higher potential for interactions with high ice clouds, despite being the climatologically much smaller dust emission source. This is due to Asian regions experiencing significantly more ascent than African regions, with strongest ascent in the Asian Taklimakan desert at ~25%, ~40% and 10% of trajectories ascending to 300 hPa in spring, summer and fall, respectively. The specific humidity at each trajectory's starting point was transported in a Lagrangian manner and relative humidities with respect to water and ice were calculated in 6-h steps downstream, allowing us to estimate the formation of liquid, mixed-phase and ice clouds. Downstream of the investigated dust sources, practically none of the simulated air parcels reached conditions of homogeneous ice nucleation (T≲−40 °C) along trajectories that have not experienced water saturation first. By far the largest fraction of cloud forming trajectories entered conditions of mixed-phase clouds, where mineral dust will potentially exert the biggest influence. The majority of trajectories also passed through atmospheric regions supersaturated with respect to ice but subsaturated with respect to water, where so-called "warm ice clouds" (T≳−40 °C) theoretically may form prior to supercooled water or mixed-phase clouds. The importance of "warm ice clouds" and the general influence of dust in the mixed-phase cloud region are highly uncertain due to both a considerable scatter in recent laboratory data from ice nucleation experiments, which we briefly review in this work, and due to uncertainties in sub-grid scale vertical transport processes unresolved by the present trajectory analysis. For "classical" cirrus-forming temperatures (T≲−40 °C), our results show that only mineral dust ice nuclei that underwent mixed-phase cloud-processing, most likely acquiring coatings of organic or inorganic material, are likely to be relevant. While the potential paucity of deposition ice nuclei shown in this work dimishes the possibility of deposition nucleation, the absence of liquid water droplets at T≲−40 °C makes the less explored contact freezing mechanism (involving droplet collisions with bare ice nuclei) highly inefficient. These factors together indicate the necessity of further systematic studies of immersion mode ice nucleation on mineral dust suspended in atmospherically relevant coatings.

scholarly journals Water droplet calibration of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds during ARCPAC

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1683-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lance ◽  
C. A. Brock ◽  
D. Rogers ◽  
J. A. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Laser Beam ◽  
Droplet Size ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Water Droplet ◽  
Optical Design ◽  
Cloud Droplet ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Water Droplets ◽  
Sample Area ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. Laboratory calibrations of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) sample area and droplet sizing are performed using water droplets of known size, generated at a known rate. Although calibrations with PSL and glass beads were consistent with theoretical instrument response, liquid water droplet calibrations were not, and necessitated a 2 μm shift in the manufacturer's calibration. We show that much of this response shift may be attributable to a misalignment of the optics relative to the axis of the laser beam. Comparison with an independent measure of liquid water content (LWC) during in-flight operation suggests much greater biases in the droplet size and/or droplet concentration measured by the CDP than would be expected based on the laboratory calibrations. Since the bias in CDP-LWC is strongly concentration dependent, we hypothesize that this discrepancy is a result of coincidence, when two or more droplets pass through the CDP laser beam within a very short time. The coincidence error, most frequently resulting from the passage of one droplet outside and one inside the instrument sample area at the same time, is evaluated in terms of an "extended sample area" (SAE), the area in which individual droplets can affect the sizing detector without necessarily registering on the qualifier. SAE is calibrated with standardized water droplets, and used in a Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the effect of coincidence on the measured droplet size distributions. The simulations show that extended coincidence errors are important for the CDP at droplet concentrations even as low as 200 cm−3, and these errors are necessary to explain the trend between calculated and measured LWC observed in liquid and mixed-phase clouds during the Aerosol, Radiation and Cloud Processes Affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) study. We estimate from the simulations that 60% oversizing error and 50% undercounting error can occur at droplet concentrations exceeding 400 cm−3. Modification of the optical design of the CDP is currently being explored in an effort to reduce this coincidence bias.

scholarly journals Cloud phase identification of low-level Arctic clouds from airborne spectral radiation measurements: test of three approaches

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 15901-15939 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ehrlich ◽  
E. Bierwirth ◽  
M. Wendisch ◽  
J.-F. Gayet ◽  
G. Mioche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Ice Crystals ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Pure Liquid ◽  
Phase Identification ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. Boundary layer clouds were investigated with a complementary set of remote sensing and in situ instruments during the Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosol, Clouds and Radiation (ASTAR) campaign in March and April 2007. The clouds that formed in a cold air outbreak over the open Greenland sea showed a variety in their thermodynamic state. Beside the predominant mixed-phase clouds pure liquid and ice clouds were observed. Utilizing the measurements of solar radiation reflected by the clouds three methods to retrieve the thermodynamic phase of the cloud were defined and compared. Two ice indices IS and IP were obtained by analyzing the spectral pattern of the cloud top reflectance in the near infrared (1500–1800 nm wavelength) characterized by ice and water absorption. A third ice index IA is based on the different side scattering of spherical liquid water particles and nonspherical ice crystals which was recorded in simultaneous measurements of cloud albedo and reflectance. Radiative transfer simulations showed that IS, IP and IA range between 5 to 80, 0 to 20 and 1 to 1.25, respectively, with lowest values indicating pure liquid water clouds and highest values pure ice clouds. IS and IP were found to be strongly sensitive to the effective diameter of the ice crystals present in the cloud. Therefore the identification of mixed-phase clouds requires a priori knowledge of the ice crystal dimension. IA has the disadvantage that this index is mainly dominated by the uppermost cloud layer (τ<1.5). Typical boundary layer mixed-phase clouds with a liquid cloud top layer will be identified as pure liquid water clouds. All three methods were applied to measurements above a cloud field observed during ASTAR 2007. The comparison with independent in situ microphysical measurements showed a good agreement in identifying the dominant mixed-phase clouds and a pure ice cloud at the edge of the cloud field.

scholarly journals In-situ Observation of Riming in Mixed-Phase Clouds using the PHIPS probe

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Waitz ◽  
Martin Schnaiter ◽  
Thomas Leisner ◽  
Emma Järvinen
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Supercooled Liquid ◽  
Liquid Water Content ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Ice Crystals ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
In Situ Observation ◽  
Cloud Particle ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. Mixed-phase clouds consist of both supercooled liquid water droplets and solid ice crystals. Despite having a significant impact on Earth‘s climate, mixed-phase clouds are poorly understood and not well represented in climate prediction models. One piece of the puzzle is understanding and parameterizing riming of mixed-phase cloud ice crystals, which is one of the main growth mechanisms of ice crystals via the accretion of small, supercooled droplets. Especially the extent of riming on ice crystals smaller than 500 μm is often overlooked in studies – mainly because observations are scarce. Here, we investigated riming in mixed-phase clouds during three airborne campaigns in the Arctic, the Southern Ocean and US east coast. Riming was observed from stereo-microscopic cloud particle images recorded with the Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering (PHIPS) probe. We show that riming is most prevalent at temperatures around −7 °C, where, on average, 43 % of the investigated particles in a size range from 100 ≤ D ≤ 700 μm showed evidence of riming. We discuss the occurrence and properties of rimed ice particles and show correlation of the occurrence and the amount of riming with ambient meteorological parameters. We show that riming fraction increases with ice particle size (< 20 % for D ≤ 200 μm, 35–40 % for D ≥ 400 μm) and liquid water content (25 % for LWC ≤ 0.05 g m−3, up to 60 % for LWC = 0.5 g m−3). We investigate the ageing of rimed particles and the difference between "normal" and "epitaxial" riming based on a case study.

scholarly journals Precipitation regimes over central Greenland inferred from 5 years of ICECAPS observations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Pettersen ◽  
Ralf Bennartz ◽  
Aronne J. Merrelli ◽  
Matthew D. Shupe ◽  
David D. Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Water ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Mixed Phase ◽  
Back Trajectory ◽  
Spectral Variation ◽  
Ice Clouds ◽  
Cloud Liquid Water ◽  
Precipitation Regimes ◽  
Mixed Phase Clouds

Abstract. A novel method for classifying Arctic precipitation using ground based remote sensors is presented. Using differences in the spectral variation of microwave absorption and scattering properties of cloud liquid water and ice, this method can distinguish between different types of snowfall events depending on the presence or absence of condensed liquid water in the clouds that generate the precipitation. The classification reveals two distinct, primary regimes of precipitation over the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS): one originating from fully glaciated ice clouds and the other from mixed-phase clouds. Five years of co-located, multi-instrument data from the Integrated Characterization of Energy, Clouds, Atmospheric state, and Precipitation at Summit (ICECAPS) are used to examine cloud and meteorological properties and patterns associated with each precipitation regime. The occurrence and accumulation of the precipitation regimes are identified and quantified. Cloud and precipitation observations from additional ICECAPS instruments illustrate distinct characteristics for each regime. Additionally, reanalysis products and back-trajectory analysis show different synoptic- scale forcings associated with each regime. Precipitation over the central GIS exhibits unique microphysical characteristics due to the high surface elevations as well as connections to specific large-scale flow patterns. Snowfall originating from the ice clouds is coupled to deep, frontal cloud systems advecting up and over the southeast Greenland coast to the central GIS. These events appear to be associated with individual storm systems generated by low pressure over Baffin Bay and Greenland lee cyclogenesis. Snowfall originating from mixed-phase clouds is shallower and has characteristics typical of supercooled cloud liquid water layers, and slowly propagates from the south and southwest Greenland along a quiescent flow above the GIS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document