scholarly journals Modeling fluvial incision and transient landscape evolution: Influence of dynamic channel adjustment

Author(s):  
M. Attal ◽  
G. E. Tucker ◽  
A. C. Whittaker ◽  
P. A. Cowie ◽  
G. P. Roberts
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7697
Author(s):  
Dario Gioia ◽  
Marcello Schiattarella

Simulation scenarios of sediment flux variation and topographic changes due to dam removal have been investigated in a reservoir catchment of the axial zone of southern Italy through the application of a landscape evolution model (i.e.,: the Caesar–Lisflood landscape evolution models, LEM). LEM simulation highlights that the abrupt change in base level due to dam removal induces a significant increase in erosion ability of main channels and a strong incision of the reservoir infill. Analysis of the sediment dynamics resulting from the dam removal highlights a significant increase of the total eroded volumes in the post dam scenario of a factor higher than 4. Model results also predict a strong modification of the longitudinal profile of main channels, which promoted fluvial incision upstream and downstream of the former reservoir area. Such a geomorphic response is in agreement with previous analysis of the fluvial system short-term response induced by base-level lowering, thus demonstrating the reliability of LEM-based analysis for solving open problems in applied geomorphology such as perturbations and short-term landscape modification natural processes or human impact.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odin Marc ◽  
Hussain Alqattan ◽  
Sean Willett

<p> Many long-term landscape evolution models are currently combining equations describing the evolution of the surface under fluvial incision (using the so-called stream-power incision model) and hillslope transport (often modeled as linear diffusion). Some models combine these two terms (e.g., Fastscape) and implicitly contain a transition from hillslope to fluvial processes dependent on the ratio of the diffusive and fluvial erosional parameters, D and K respectively (Perron et al., 2009). Other models require as input a hillslope-fluvial transition length (e.g., DAC) and apply hillslope erosion from the ridge-top to this lengthscale and fluvial incision only downstream of it. Still, in both cases the influence of non-linear processes such as landslide and debris-flow on this transition are not accounted.</p><p>We have analyzed the scaling between slope gradient and drainage areas in LIDAR-derived high-resolution DEM for >30 catchments, with apparent steady-state morphology, and where long-term denudation estimates, E, were estimated from cosmogenic nuclides . The catchments span different lithology, climate and denudation rates from ~0.05 to ~3 mm/yr but show a consistent pattern where substantial portion of upstream channels exhibit slope gradient roughly constant with drainage area, and transition towards a negative scaling between slope and area (characteristic of fluvial processes) after a critical drainage area, A<sub>c.</sub> Previous work (Stock and Dietrich, 2003) suggested the portion with constant slope may be dominated by erosion due to debris-flow processes, maintaining the channel at a critical slope, S<sub>df</sub>.</p><p>Here we show that both S<sub>df</sub>, and A<sub>c</sub>, are strongly correlated to the long-term denudation, E. Further, we find that S<sub>df</sub> seems to saturate at a critical slope angle, S<sub>c</sub> , near 40° when denudation rates reach about 1mm/yr consistent with predictions for the slope of a non-linear diffusive hillsllopes (Roering et al., 2007). Combining this expression with the empirical model for the steady-state slope of Stock and Dietrich, 2003, and enforcing the consistency with a stream-power-law downstream we find that the steady state values for S<sub>df</sub> and A<sub>c</sub> can be fully expressed as analytical functions of E, K, D and S<sub>c</sub>. We assess the validity of these expressions with independent estimate of K and D extracted from local channel steepness and hilltop curvature. </p><p>As the impact of debris flow on landscape morphology seems ubiquitous on landscape with more than 0.1 mm/yr of erosion, the classical landscape evolution formulation may need to be upgraded to correctly represent steady-state morphology of the upstream part of catchment (<span>i.e.</span>, <1km<sup>2</sup>). Even if it still lack physical basis, we propose a formulation that adequately represent the steady state morphology from ridge to large drainage area. We show that it yield a new definition of Chi that may be better match the morphology of channel approaching ridges and we also discuss how to implement this new-steady state formulation in landscape evolution models.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document