Regional cloud characteristics over the tropical northwestern Pacific as revealed by Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar and TRMM Microwave Imager

2007 ◽  
Vol 112 (D5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Sook Park ◽  
Yong-Sang Choi ◽  
Chang-Hoi Ho ◽  
Chung-Hsiung Sui ◽  
Seon Ki Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Northwestern Pacific ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
Cloud Characteristics ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager

scholarly journals Differences of Rainfall Estimates over Land by Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar (PR) and TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI)—Dependence on Storm Height

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumie A. Furuzawa ◽  
Kenji Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Local Times ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Tropical Rainfall ◽  
Convective Rain ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Orbit Data

Abstract It is well known that precipitation rate estimation is poor over land. Using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI), the performance of the TMI rain estimation was investigated. Their differences over land were checked by using the orbit-by-orbit data for June 1998, December 1998, January 1999, and February 1999, and the following results were obtained: 1) Rain rate (RR) near the surface for the TMI (TMI-RR) is smaller than that for the PR (PR-RR) in winter; it is also smaller from 0900 to 1800 LT. These dependencies show some variations at various latitudes or local times. 2) When the storm height is low (<5 km), the TMI-RR is smaller than the PR-RR; when it is high (>8 km), the PR-RR is smaller. These dependencies of the RR on the storm height do not depend on local time or latitude. The tendency for a TMI-RR to be smaller when the storm height is low is more noticeable in convective rain than in stratiform rain. 3) Rain with a low storm height predominates in winter or from 0600 to 1500 LT, and convective rain occurs frequently from 1200 to 2100 LT. Result 1 can be explained by results 2 and 3. It can be concluded that the TMI underestimates rain with low storm height over land because of the weakness of the TMI algorithm, especially for convective rain. On the other hand, it is speculated that TMI overestimates rain with high storm height because of the effect of anvil rain with low brightness temperatures at high frequencies without rain near the surface, and because of the effect of evaporation or tilting, which is indicated by a PR profile and does not appear in the TMI profile. Moreover, it was found that the PR rain for the cases with no TMI rain amounted to about 10%–30% of the total but that the TMI rain for the cases with no PR rain accounted for only a few percent of the TMI rain. This result can be explained by the difficulty of detecting shallow rain with the TMI.

scholarly journals TRMM Version 8 Reprocessing Improvements and Incorporation into the GPM Data Suite

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1181-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. F. Stocker ◽  
F. Alquaied ◽  
S. Bilanow ◽  
Y. Ji ◽  
L. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has always included data reprocessing as a major component of every science mission. A final reprocessing is typically a part of mission closeout (known as phase F). The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is currently in phase F, and NASA is preparing for the last reprocessing of all the TRMM precipitation data as part of the closeout. This reprocessing includes improvements in calibration of both the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and the TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR). An initial step in the version 8 reprocessing is the improvement of geolocation. The PR calibration is being updated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) using data collected as part of the calibration of the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory. JAXA undertook a major effort to ensure TRMM PR and GPM Ku-band calibration is consistent.A major component of the TRMM version 8 reprocessing is to create consistent retrievals with the GPM version 05 (V05) retrievals. To this end, the TRMM version 8 reprocessing uses retrieval algorithms based on the GPM V05 algorithms. This approach ensures consistent retrievals from December 1997 (the beginning of TRMM) through the current ongoing GPM retrievals. An outcome of this reprocessing is the incorporation of TRMM data products into the GPM data suite. Incorporation also means that GPM file naming conventions and reprocessed TRMM data carry the V05 data product version. This paper describes the TRMM version 8 reprocessing, focusing on the improvements in TMI level 1 products.

scholarly journals Hurricane GPROF: An Optimized Ocean Microwave Rainfall Retrieval for Tropical Cyclones

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1539-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula J. Brown ◽  
Christian D. Kummerow ◽  
David L. Randel
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclones ◽  
Vertical Profile ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
One Year ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractThe Goddard profiling algorithm (GPROF) is an operational passive microwave retrieval that uses a Bayesian scheme to estimate rainfall. GPROF 2014 retrieves rainfall and hydrometeor vertical profile information based upon a database of profiles constructed to be simultaneously consistent with Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) and TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) observations. A small number of tropical cyclones are in the current database constructed from one year of TRMM data, resulting in the retrieval performing relatively poorly for these systems, particularly for the highest rain rates. To address this deficiency, a new database focusing specifically on hurricanes but consisting of 9 years of TRMM data is created. The new database and retrieval procedure for TMI and GMI is called Hurricane GPROF. An initial assessment of seven tropical cyclones shows that Hurricane GPROF provides a better estimate of hurricane rain rates than GPROF 2014. Hurricane GPROF rain-rate errors relative to the PR are reduced by 20% compared to GPROF, with improvements in the lowest and highest rain rates especially. Vertical profile retrievals for four hydrometeors are also enhanced, as error is reduced by 30% compared to the GPROF retrieval, relative to PR estimates. When compared to the full database of tropical cyclones, Hurricane GPROF improves the RMSE and MAE of rain-rate estimates over those from GPROF by about 22% and 27%, respectively. Similar improvements are also seen in the overall rain-rate bias for hurricanes in the database, which is reduced from 0.20 to −0.06 mm h−1.

scholarly journals Investigating Seasonal PR–TMI Calibration Differences

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1228-1237
Author(s):  
Tufa Dinku ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Keyword(s):  
Amazon Basin ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Seasonal Differences ◽  
Geographic Regions ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Retrieval

Abstract Seasonal differences in the calibration of overland passive microwave rain retrieval are investigated using Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Microwave Imager (TMI) and precipitation radar (PR). Four geographic regions from southern Africa, South Asia, the Amazon basin, and the southeastern United States are selected. Three seasons are compared for each region. Two scenarios of algorithm calibration are considered. In the first, the parameter sets are derived by calibrating the TMI algorithm with PR in each season. In the second scenario, common parameter sets are derived from the combined dataset of all three seasons. The parameter sets from both scenarios are then applied to the validation dataset of each season to determine the effect of seasonal calibration. Furthermore, calibration parameters from one season are also applied to another season, and results are compared against those derived using the season’s own parameters. Appreciable seasonal differences are observed for the U.S. region, while there are no significant differences between using individual seasonal calibration and the all-season calibration for the other regions. However, using one season’s parameter set to retrieve rainfall for another season is associated with increased uncertainty. It is also shown that the performance of the retrieval varies by season.

scholarly journals A Comparison of TRMM Microwave Techniques for Detecting the Diurnal Rainfall Cycle

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria L. Sanderson ◽  
Chris Kidd ◽  
Glenn R. McGregor
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Diurnal Rainfall ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Microwave Techniques ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Climatic Signals

Abstract This paper uses rainfall estimates retrieved from active and passive microwave data to investigate how spatially and temporally dependent algorithm biases affect the monitoring of the diurnal rainfall cycle. Microwave estimates used in this study are from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and include the precipitation radar (PR) near-surface (2A25), Goddard Profiling (GPROF) (2A12), and PR–TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) (2B31) rain rates from the version 5 (v5) 3G68 product. A rainfall maximum is observed early evening over land, while oceans generally show a minimum in rainfall during the morning. Comparisons of annual and seasonal mean hourly rain rates and harmonics at both global and regional scales show significant differences between the algorithms. Relative and absolute biases over land vary according to the time of day. Clearly, these retrieval biases need accounting for, either in the physics of the algorithm or through the provision of accurate error estimates, to avoid erroneous climatic signals and the discrediting of satellite rainfall estimations.

Comparison of TRMM-Derived Rainfall Products for General and Extreme Rains over the Maritime Continent

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1867-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andung Bayu Sekaranom ◽  
Hirohiko Masunaga
Keyword(s):  
Rain Rate ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Maritime Continent ◽  
Brightness Temperatures ◽  
Extreme Rain ◽  
Trmm Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation Analysis ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Trmm Microwave Imager ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractProperties of the rain estimation differences between Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Precipitation Radar (PR) 2A25, TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) 2A12, and TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42 are investigated with a focus on distinguishing between nonextreme and extreme rains over the Maritime Continent from 1998 to 2014. Statistical analyses of collocated TMI 1B11 85-GHz polarization-corrected brightness temperatures, PR 2A23 storm-top heights, and PR 2A25 vertical rain profiles are conducted to identify possible sources of the differences. The results indicate that a large estimation difference exists between PR and TMI for the general rain rate (extreme and nonextreme events). The PR–TMI rain-rate differences are larger over land and coast than over ocean. When extreme rain is isolated, a higher frequency of occurrence is identified by PR over ocean, followed by TMI and TMPA. Over land, TMI yields higher rain frequencies than PR with an intermediate range of rain rates (between 15 and 25 mm h−1), but it gives way to PR for the highest extremes. The turnover at the highest rain rates arises because the heaviest rain depicted by PR does not necessarily accompany the strongest ice-scattering signals, which TMI relies on for estimating precipitation over land and coast.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document