scholarly journals Dynamical controls on sub–global climate model grid-scale cloud variability for Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM) case 4

2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (D15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation ◽  
Radiation Measurement ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement

Evaluation of the Multiscale Modeling Framework Using Data from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1716-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Ovtchinnikov ◽  
Thomas Ackerman ◽  
Roger Marchand ◽  
Marat Khairoutdinov
Keyword(s):  
Multiscale Modeling ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation ◽  
Radiation Measurement ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ◽  
Radiation Parameterizations ◽  
Multiscale Modeling Framework

Abstract In a recently developed approach to climate modeling, called the multiscale modeling framework (MMF), a two-dimensional cloud-resolving model (CRM) is embedded into each grid column of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM), replacing traditional cloud and radiation parameterizations. This study presents an evaluation of the MMF through a comparison of its output with the output from the CAM and with data from two observational sites operated by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, one at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) in Oklahoma and one at the island of Nauru in the tropical western Pacific (TWP) region. Two sets of one-year-long simulations are considered: one using climatological sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and another using 1999 SST. Each set includes a run with the MMF as well as a CAM run with traditional or standard cloud and radiation treatments. Time series of cloud fraction, precipitation intensity, and downwelling solar radiation flux at the surface are analyzed. For the TWP site, the distributions of these variables from the MMF run are shown to be more consistent with observation than those from the CAM run. This change is attributed to the improved representation of convective clouds in the MMF compared to the conventional climate model. For the SGP, the MMF shows little to no improvement in predicting the same quantities. Possible causes of this lack of improvement are discussed.

scholarly journals Calibration of the 2007–2017 record of Atmospheric Radiation Measurements cloud radar observations using CloudSat

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4949-4964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlos Kollias ◽  
Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras ◽  
Alain Protat
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Operating Mode ◽  
Historical Record ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Radiation Measurements

Abstract. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) facility has been at the forefront of millimeter-wavelength radar development and operations since the late 1990s. The operational performance of the ARM cloud radar network is very high; however, the calibration of the historical record is not well established. Here, a well-characterized spaceborne 94 GHz cloud profiling radar (CloudSat) is used to characterize the calibration of the ARM cloud radars. The calibration extends from 2007 to 2017 and includes both fixed and mobile deployments. Collectively, over 43 years of ARM profiling cloud radar observations are compared to CloudSat and the calibration offsets are reported as a function of time using a sliding window of 6 months. The study also provides the calibration offsets for each operating mode of the ARM cloud radars. Overall, significant calibration offsets are found that exceed the uncertainty of the technique (1–2 dB). The findings of this study are critical to past, ongoing, and planned studies of cloud and precipitation and should assist the DOE ARM to build a legacy decadal ground-based cloud radar dataset for global climate model validation.

High bit rate ACTS experiments for performing global science - Keck Telescope and global climate model

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Bergman ◽  
J. Gary ◽  
Burt Edelson ◽  
Neil Helm ◽  
Judith Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Bit Rate ◽  
Global Science ◽  
High Bit Rate

scholarly journals A comparison of ship and satellite measurements of cloud properties with global climate model simulations in the southeast Pacific stratus deck

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 6527-6536 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Brunke ◽  
S. P. de Szoeke ◽  
P. Zuidema ◽  
X. Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Diurnal Cycle ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Southeast Pacific ◽  
Cloud Thickness

Abstract. Here, liquid water path (LWP), cloud fraction, cloud top height, and cloud base height retrieved by a suite of A-train satellite instruments (the CPR aboard CloudSat, CALIOP aboard CALIPSO, and MODIS aboard Aqua) are compared to ship observations from research cruises made in 2001 and 2003–2007 into the stratus/stratocumulus deck over the southeast Pacific Ocean. It is found that CloudSat radar-only LWP is generally too high over this region and the CloudSat/CALIPSO cloud bases are too low. This results in a relationship (LWP~h9) between CloudSat LWP and CALIPSO cloud thickness (h) that is very different from the adiabatic relationship (LWP~h2) from in situ observations. Such biases can be reduced if LWPs suspected to be contaminated by precipitation are eliminated, as determined by the maximum radar reflectivity Zmax>−15 dBZ in the apparent lower half of the cloud, and if cloud bases are determined based upon the adiabatically-determined cloud thickness (h~LWP1/2). Furthermore, comparing results from a global model (CAM3.1) to ship observations reveals that, while the simulated LWP is quite reasonable, the model cloud is too thick and too low, allowing the model to have LWPs that are almost independent of h. This model can also obtain a reasonable diurnal cycle in LWP and cloud fraction at a location roughly in the centre of this region (20° S, 85° W) but has an opposite diurnal cycle to those observed aboard ship at a location closer to the coast (20° S, 75° W). The diurnal cycle at the latter location is slightly improved in the newest version of the model (CAM4). However, the simulated clouds remain too thick and too low, as cloud bases are usually at or near the surface.

Two-way coupling of an ENSO model to the global climate model CLIMBER-3

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Goelzer ◽  
Anders Levermann ◽  
Stefan Rahmstorf
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Enso Model

Downscaling of precipitation on a lake basin: evaluation of rule and decision tree induction algorithms

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish Kumar Goyal ◽  
C. S. P. Ojha
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Lake Basin ◽  
Monthly Precipitation ◽  
M5 Model Tree ◽  
Reanalysis Dataset ◽  
Model Tree ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
M5 Model

We investigate the performance of existing state-of-the-art rule induction and tree algorithms, namely Single Conjunctive Rule Learner, Decision Table, M5 Model Tree, Decision Stump and REPTree. Downscaling models are developed using these algorithms to obtain projections of mean monthly precipitation to lake-basin scale in an arid region in India. The effectiveness of these algorithms is evaluated through application to downscale the predictand for the Lake Pichola region in Rajasthan state in India, which is considered to be a climatically sensitive region. The predictor variables are extracted from (1) the National Centre for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis dataset for the period 1948–2000 and (2) the simulations from the third-generation Canadian Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3) for emission scenarios A1B, A2, B1 and COMMIT for the period 2001–2100. M5 Model Tree algorithm was found to yield better performance among all other learning techniques explored in the present study. The precipitation is projected to increase in future for A2 and A1B scenarios, whereas it is least for B1 and COMMIT scenarios using predictors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document