scholarly journals Modeling impacts of farming management alternatives on CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions: A case study for water management of rice agriculture of China

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changsheng Li ◽  
Steve Frolking ◽  
Xiangming Xiao ◽  
Berrien Moore ◽  
Steve Boles ◽  
...  
Chemosphere ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 884-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huijing Hou ◽  
Shizhang Peng ◽  
Junzeng Xu ◽  
Shihong Yang ◽  
Zhi Mao

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (17) ◽  
pp. 2033-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Zampieri ◽  
Andrej Ceglar ◽  
Giacinto Manfron ◽  
Andrea Toreti ◽  
Gregory Duveiller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Ali Pramono ◽  
Terry Ayu Adriani ◽  
Prihasto Setyanto

Rice field is an important role in sustainable national food security, rice production contributes to greenhouse gas emissions significantly, especially methane (Ch4). Some of these efforts to reduce GHG emissions in the paddy field has been done, such as water and fertilizer management, using low methane emission of rice varieties. The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of water management systems and rice varieties on grain yield and GHG emissions. The study was conducted at the Experimental Research Station of IAERI, Pati, Central Java in March to June 2016. The study design was a split plot with the factor I water management (A1 = Flooded 5 cm and A2 = Alternate Wetting and Drying / AWD), factor II rice varieties (V1 = Ciherang, V2 = Inpari 30, V3 = IPB3S), and replicated 3 times. GHG measurement was conducted using a closed chamber. The parameters were observed mainly CH4 and N2O fluxes, Eh and pH, water level surface, plant height and tiller number, grain and yield components. The results showed that the highest grain yields was A2V1 -1 treatment (AWD and Ciherang variety) amounted to 3.26 tons ha . The lowest of CH4 emissions was A2V1 treatment (AWD and Ciherang variety). N2O emissions produced the lowest in treatment A2V3 (AWD and IPB3S variety). The highest of GHG emissions was A1V3 treatment (continuous flooding and IPB3S variety). The lowest of GHG emissions was A2V1 treatment (AWD and Ciherang variety). The lowest emissions index was A2V2 treatment (AWD and Inpari 30 variety). AWD treatment could reduce GHG emissions of Ciherang, Inpari 30 and IPB3S rice varieties by 42%, 46%, and 30% compared to continuous flooding, respectively.  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bramka Arga Jafino ◽  
Jan Kwakkel ◽  
Frans Klijn ◽  
Nguyen Viet Dung ◽  
Hedwig van Delden ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Thi Hoang Duong ◽  
Avner Adin ◽  
David Jackman ◽  
Peter van der Steen ◽  
Kala Vairavamoorthy

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3323
Author(s):  
Nishtman Karimi ◽  
Hossein Azadi ◽  
Kobe Boussauw

Continuously changing conditions of sociotechnical systems are the basis of structural changes in communities. Relationships between transition contexts and regime transformation processes and their driving factors in sociotechnical regimes are poorly understood. Moreover, not all changes in multilevel governance regimes are geared towards sustainability, as demonstrated by the case of the water management regime in Sanandaj county in the west of Iran between 1962 and 2018. The current study shows how the management regime of water resources in the case study has changed over time and identifies the institutional arrangements through a retrospective analysis. The analysis is based on three stages of data collection which included a discussion group, a Delphi survey, and a focus group survey among various types of stakeholders. The “Hybrid Transitions” framework is introduced in order to denote processes of regime change that take place in a range of different transition contexts. The findings do not identify a single transition pathway but show that a number of parallel transition pathways have occurred in the context of groundwater and surface water management and their respective institutional arrangements. The study provides a better understanding of the complexity of transition pathways that were devised at the management regime level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document