scholarly journals Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

2004 ◽  
Vol 109 (A4) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-Y. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Field Response

scholarly journals Geosynchronous Magnetic Field Response to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Jong-Sun Park ◽  
Khan-Hyuk Kim ◽  
Dong-Hun Lee ◽  
En-Sang Lee ◽  
Ho Jin
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Field Response

scholarly journals Multi-satellite simultaneous observations of magnetopause and atmospheric losses of radiation belt electrons during an intense solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Xiang ◽  
Binbin Ni ◽  
Chen Zhou ◽  
Zhengyang Zou ◽  
Xudong Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Electron Flux ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Energetic Electron ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Angle Scattering ◽  
Radiation Belt Electrons ◽  
Atmospheric Loss

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Radiation belt electron flux dropouts are a kind of drastic variation in the Earth's magnetosphere, understanding of which is of both scientific and societal importance. Using electron flux data from a group of 14 satellites, we report multi-satellite simultaneous observations of magnetopause and atmospheric losses of radiation belt electrons during an event of intense solar wind dynamic pressure pulse. When the pulse occurred, magnetopause and atmospheric loss could take effect concurrently contributing to the electron flux dropout. Losses through the magnetopause were observed to be efficient and significant at <i>L</i> ≳ 5, owing to the magnetopause intrusion into <i>L</i> ∼ 6 and outward radial diffusion associated with sharp negative gradient in electron phase space density. Losses to the atmosphere were directly identified from the precipitating electron flux observations, for which pitch angle scattering by plasma waves could be mainly responsible. While the convection and substorm injections strongly enhanced the energetic electron fluxes up to hundreds of keV, they could delay other than avoid the occurrence of electron flux dropout at these energies. It is demonstrated that the pulse-time radiation belt electron flux dropout depends strongly on the specific interplanetary and magnetospheric conditions and that losses through the magnetopause and to the atmosphere and enhancements of substorm injection play an essential role in combination, which should be incorporated as a whole into future simulations for comprehending the nature of radiation belt electron flux dropouts.</p>

scholarly journals Cluster survey of the mid-altitude cusp: 1. size, location, and dynamics

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 3011-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Pitout ◽  
C. P. Escoubet ◽  
B. Klecker ◽  
H. Rème
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Time Delay ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Statistical Study ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Summer Hemisphere ◽  
External Conditions

Abstract. We present a statistical study of four years of Cluster crossings of the mid-altitude cusp. In this first part of the study, we start by introducing the method we have used a) to define the cusp properties, b) to sort the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions or behaviors into classes, c) to determine the proper time delay between the solar wind monitors and Cluster. Out of the 920 passes that we have analyzed, only 261 fulfill our criteria and are considered as cusp crossings. We look at the size, location and dynamics of the mid-altitude cusp under various IMF orientations and solar wind conditions. For southward IMF, Bz rules the latitudinal dynamics, whereas By governs the zonal dynamics, confirming previous works. We show that when |By| is larger than |Bz|, the cusp widens and its location decorrelates from By. We interpret this feature in terms of component reconnection occurring under By-dominated IMF. For northward IMF, we demonstrate that the location of the cusp depends primarily upon the solar wind dynamic pressure and upon the Y-component of the IMF. Also, the multipoint capability of Cluster allows us to conclude that the cusp needs typically more than ~20 min to fully adjust its location and size in response to changes in external conditions, and its speed is correlated to variations in the amplitude of IMF-Bz. Indeed, the velocity in °ILAT/min of the cusp appears to be proportional to the variation in Bz in nT: Vcusp=0.024 ΔBz. Finally, we observe differences in the behavior of the cusp in the two hemispheres. Those differences suggest that the cusp moves and widens more freely in the summer hemisphere.

scholarly journals GPS phase scintillation at high latitudes during geomagnetic storms of 7–17 March 2012 – Part 1: The North American sector

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Prikryl ◽  
R. Ghoddousi-Fard ◽  
E. G. Thomas ◽  
J. M. Ruohoniemi ◽  
S. G. Shepherd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
The North ◽  
Auroral Emission ◽  
Ground Magnetic

Abstract. The interval of geomagnetic storms of 7–17 March 2012 was selected at the Climate and Weather of the Sun-Earth System (CAWSES) II Workshop for group study of space weather effects during the ascending phase of solar cycle 24 (Tsurutani et al., 2014). The high-latitude ionospheric response to a series of storms is studied using arrays of GPS receivers, HF radars, ionosondes, riometers, magnetometers, and auroral imagers focusing on GPS phase scintillation. Four geomagnetic storms showed varied responses to solar wind conditions characterized by the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and solar wind dynamic pressure. As a function of magnetic latitude and magnetic local time, regions of enhanced scintillation are identified in the context of coupling processes between the solar wind and the magnetosphere–ionosphere system. Large southward IMF and high solar wind dynamic pressure resulted in the strongest scintillation in the nightside auroral oval. Scintillation occurrence was correlated with ground magnetic field perturbations and riometer absorption enhancements, and collocated with mapped auroral emission. During periods of southward IMF, scintillation was also collocated with ionospheric convection in the expanded dawn and dusk cells, with the antisunward convection in the polar cap and with a tongue of ionization fractured into patches. In contrast, large northward IMF combined with a strong solar wind dynamic pressure pulse was followed by scintillation caused by transpolar arcs in the polar cap.

scholarly journals Magnetic field variations in the Jovian magnetotail induced by solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (A11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chihiro Tao ◽  
Ryuho Kataoka ◽  
Hiroshi Fukunishi ◽  
Yukihiro Takahashi ◽  
Takaaki Yokoyama
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Field Variations

scholarly journals Azimuthally asymmetric ring current as a function of <i>D<sub>st</sub></i> and solar wind conditions

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2989-2996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. P. Maltsev ◽  
A. A. Ostapenko
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Ring Current ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Under Five ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters

Abstract. Based on magnetic data, spatial distribution of the westward ring current flowing at |z|<3 RE has been found under five levels of Dst, five levels of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) z component, and five levels of the solar wind dynamic pressure Psw. The maximum of the current is located near midnight at distances 5 to 7 RE. The magnitude of the nightside and dayside parts of the westward current at distances from 4 to 9 RE can be approximated as Inight=1.75-0.041 Dst, Inoon=0.22-0.013 Dst, where the current is in MA. The relation of the nightside current to the solar wind parameters can be expressed as Inight=1.45-0.20 Bs IMF + 0.32 Psw, where BsIMF is the IMF southward component. The dayside ring current poorly correlates with the solar wind parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document