scholarly journals Sensitivity of northern hemisphere surface climate to simulation of the stratospheric polar vortex

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Norton
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Surface Climate ◽  
Hemisphere Surface

scholarly journals Stratospheric modulation of winter temperature trends in a warming climate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Butler ◽  
Alexey Karpechko ◽  
Chaim Garfinkel
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Decadal Variability ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Climate Simulation ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Temperature Trends ◽  
Surface Climate ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
Downward Influence ◽  
Hemisphere Winter

Abstract Variability in the circumpolar westerly winds of the Northern Hemisphere winter polar stratosphere-- the stratospheric polar vortex-- has a known downward influence on the extratropical surface climate on sub-seasonal timescales. On longer timescales, observed trends towards a weakening stratospheric polar vortex have been linked to cooling surface temperatures over Eurasia from 1990-2009. Here, we show that 10-40 year polar vortex weakening trends occur as often as strengthening trends in large-ensemble historical climate simulations, and that decadal variability in polar vortex trends is significantly linked to decadal variability in regional surface temperature trends across the Northern Hemisphere even as the climate warms. We find that 74% of ensemble members with cooling trends over Eurasia during an 1850-2099 climate simulation also exhibit a weakening polar vortex, while 70% of members with accelerated warming over Eurasia exhibit a strengthening polar vortex. Decadal variability in the polar vortex thus modulates extratropical anthropogenically-forced warming trends.

scholarly journals Nonlinear response of Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex to the Indo–Pacific warm pool (IPWP) Niño

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Quanliang Chen ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Jianping Li ◽  
Minggang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Warm Pool ◽  
Boreal Winter ◽  
Linear Wave ◽  
Stationary Waves ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Pacific Warm Pool ◽  
Tropical Sea

Abstract Variations in tropical sea surface temperatures (SST) have pronounced impacts on the stratospheric polar vortex, with the role of El Niño being the focus of much research interest. However, the Indo–Pacific warm pool (IPWP), which is the warmest body of seawater in the world, has received less attention. The IPWP has been warming in recent years. This paper presents for the first time the remarkable nonlinearity in Northern Hemisphere (NH) stratospheric circulation and temperature response to IPWP warming (the so-called IPWP Niño) in boreal winter. The magnitude of NH stratospheric vortex weakening is strong and significant in case of moderate IPWP Niño, but is weak and insignificant in strong IPWP Niño case. This phenomenon is robust in both the historical simulations and observations. An idealized model experiments forced with linear varying SST forcing in the IPWP region isolate the nonlinearities arising from IPWP Niño strength. Westward extension of precipitation into the Maritime Continent drives attenuation and westward shift of extratropical waves during strong IPWP Niño events. Linear wave interference analysis reveals this leads to weak interference between the climatological and anomalous stationary waves and thereby a weak response of the stratospheric vortex. These findings imply a distinct stratospheric vortex response to the IPWP Niño, and provide extended implications for the surface climate in the NH.

The stratospheric response and surface influence in a bias-corrected model.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Tyrrell ◽  
Alexey Karpechko ◽  
Sebastian Rast
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Surface Response ◽  
Model Biases ◽  
Increased Strength ◽  
And Control ◽  
Bias Corrections

<p>We investigate the effect of systematic model biases on teleconnections influencing the Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation. We perform a two-step nudging and bias-correcting scheme for the dynamic variables of the ECHAM6 atmospheric model to reduce errors in the model climatology relative to ERA-Interim. The developed scheme is efficient in removing errors in model’s climatology. In particular, large negative bias in December-February mean zonal stratospheric winds is reduced by up to 75%, significantly increasing the strength of the Northern Hemisphere wintertime stratospheric polar vortex. <!-- I think calling increase in vortex strength ”a result” somewhat shifts the focus. The result is reduced error, not increased strength. I mean technically it is the same, but perception of the result is a bit different. What do you think? -->The bias-corrections are applied to the full atmosphere or stratosphere only.</p><p>We compare the response of bias-corrected and control runs to internal stratospheric variability and surface forcings that are important on seasonal timescales: Siberian snow cover in October; the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO); and ENSO. We find the bias-corrected model has the potential for a strengthened and more realistic response to the teleconnections, either in the stratospheric or surface response. In particular, the bias-corrected model has a strong QBO teleconnection which modulates the extratropical polar vortex and sea level pressure variability in a manner similar to that seen in observations. The Siberian snow forcing with the stratosphere-only bias-corrections also leads to an enhanced surface response relative to the control.<!-- Given considerable remaining biases in tropospheric waves in the stratosphere-only bias corrected run I would not overemphasize the results in this particular run especially because full bias-corrected run does not show large surface response. But it is Ok to mention this result in the abstract. --> The mechanism behind the sensitivity of the teleconnections to model biases is discussed.</p>

scholarly journals Origins of Multi-decadal Variability in Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Dimdore-Miles ◽  
Lesley Gray ◽  
Scott Osprey
Keyword(s):  
Decadal Variability ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Surface Climate ◽  
Tropospheric Circulation ◽  
Tropical Sea

<p>Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are major disruptions of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) stratospheric polar vortex and occur on average approximately 6 times per decade in observation based records. However, within these records, intervals of significantly higher and lower SSW rates are observed suggesting the possibility of low frequency variations in event occurrence. A better understanding of factors that influence this decadal variability may help to improve predictability of NH mid-latitude surface climate, through stratosphere-troposphere coupling. In this work, multi-decadal variability of SSW events is examined in a 1000-yr pre-industrial simulation of a coupled Atmosphere-Ocean-Land-Sea ice model. Using a wavelet spectral decomposition method, we show that hiatus events (intervals of a decade or more with no SSWs) and consecutive SSW events (extended intervals with at least one SSW in each year) vary on multi-decadal timescales of period between 60 and 90 years. Signals on these timescales are present for approximately 450 years of the simulation. We investigate the possible source of these long-term signals and find that the direct impact of variability in tropical sea surface temperatures, as well as the associated Aleutian Low, can account for only a small portion of the SSW variability. Instead, the major influence on long-term SSW variability is associated with long-term variability in amplitude of the stratospheric quasi biennial oscillation (QBO). The QBO influence is consistent with the well known Holton-Tan relationship, with SSW hiatus intervals associated with extended periods of particularly strong, deep QBO westerly phases. The results support recent studies that have highlighted the role of vertical coherence in the QBO when considering coupling between the QBO, the polar vortex and tropospheric circulation.</p>

scholarly journals The effect of interactive ozone chemistry on weak and strong stratospheric polar vortex events

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Oehrlein ◽  
Gabriel Chiodo ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Winter Climate ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Modeling and observational studies have reported effects of stratospheric ozone extremes on Northern Hemisphere spring climate. Recent work has further suggested that the coupling of ozone chemistry and dynamics amplifies the surface response to midwinter sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs). Here, we study the importance of interactive ozone chemistry in representing the stratospheric polar vortex and Northern Hemisphere winter surface climate variability. We contrast two simulations from the interactive and specified chemistry (and thus ozone) versions of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model, designed to isolate the impact of interactive ozone on polar vortex variability. In particular, we analyze the response with and without interactive chemistry to midwinter SSWs, March SSWs, and strong polar vortex events (SPVs). With interactive chemistry, the stratospheric polar vortex is stronger, and more SPVs occur, but we find little effect on the frequency of midwinter SSWs. At the surface, interactive chemistry results in a pattern resembling a more negative North Atlantic Oscillation following midwinter SSWs, but with little impact on the surface signatures of late winter SSWs and SPVs. These results suggest that including interactive ozone chemistry is important for representing North Atlantic and European winter climate variability.

Emergence of Southern Hemisphere circulation changes in response to ozone recovery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Zambri ◽  
Susan Solomon ◽  
David Thompson ◽  
Qiang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Southern Hemisphere ◽  
Ozone Depletion ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Surface Climate ◽  
Antarctic Ozone ◽  
Ozone Depleting Substances ◽  
Circulation Changes

<p>Ozone depletion in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) stratosphere in the late 20<sup>th</sup> century cooled the air there, strengthening the SH stratospheric westerly winds near 60ºS and altering SH surface climate. Since ~1999, trends in Antarctic ozone have begun to recover, exhibiting a flattening followed by a sign reversal in response to decreases in stratospheric chlorine concentration due to the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty banning the production and consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Here we show that the post–1999 increase in ozone has resulted in thermal and circulation changes of opposite sign to those that resulted from stratospheric ozone losses, including a warming of the SH polar lower stratosphere and a weakening of the SH stratospheric polar vortex.  Further, these altered trends extend to the upper troposphere, albeit of smaller magnitudes.  Observed post–1999 trends of temperature and circulation in the stratosphere are about 20–25% the magnitude of those of the ozone depletion era, and are broadly consistent with expectations based on modeled depletion-era trends and variability of both ozone and reactive chlorine, thereby indicating the emergence of healing of dynamical impacts of the Antarctic ozone hole.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document