Structure of the SE Greenland margin from seismic reflection and refraction data: Implications for nascent spreading center subsidence and asymmetric crustal accretion during North Atlantic opening

Author(s):  
John R. Hopper ◽  
Trine Dahl-Jensen ◽  
W. Steven Holbrook ◽  
Hans Christian Larsen ◽  
Dan Lizarralde ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Thinon ◽  
L. Matias ◽  
J.P. RÉhault ◽  
A. Hirn ◽  
L. Fidalgo-GonzÁlez ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 264 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 21-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Juhlin ◽  
J.H. Knapp ◽  
S. Kashubin ◽  
M. Bliznetsov

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. SC23-SC33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luan C. Nguyen ◽  
Paul Mann

Although the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) has been the subject of geophysical and geologic studies for several decades, its crustal structures and opening kinematics remain poorly understood largely because of the difficulty in imaging the deeper basinal structure beneath its thick sedimentary and evaporitic layers. We have used gravity and magnetic data combined with seismic reflection and refraction data to better understand the crustal structure and basin opening kinematics. We have focused on the 700-km-long Jurassic continent/ocean transform fault that accommodated counterclockwise rotation of the Yucatan Block along the eastern continental margin of Mexico. We have used recent satellite-derived gravity data to reveal the pattern of spreading ridge-transform segments in the center of the basin. We then derived on a pole of rotation that revealed the kinematics of early opening of the GOM basin and the tectonic control the continent-ocean transform fault, the Western Main Transform fault (WMTF), that defined the continent-ocean boundary (COB) between continental rocks in the eastern Mexico and Jurassic oceanic crust in the western GOM. Regional magnetic anomaly data along with seismic reflection and refraction data were used to further constrain the location of the WMTF. Three 2D gravity models revealed the location of the WMTF approximately 100 km offshore eastern Mexico at its furthest point and extending onshore in southern Mexico. The gravity models found that the contact between continental and oceanic crust is marked by an abrupt increase from 6.5 to 10 km in crustal thickness. To the west of the WMTF, the eastern Mexico margin is underlain by a 60-km-wide zone of stretched continental crust. We also determined a COB for the entire GOM that was consistent with the plate reconstruction, values of crustal thickness based on seismic refraction, and fracture zone azimuths related to the Jurassic spreading system.


1987 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
St. Mueller ◽  
J. Ansorge ◽  
N. Sierro ◽  
P. Finckh ◽  
D. Emter

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1838-1842 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Schmeissner ◽  
K. T. Spikes ◽  
D. W. Steeples

Ultrashallow seismic reflection surveys require dense spatial sampling during data acquisition, which increases their cost. In previous efforts to find ways to reduce these costs, we connected geophones rigidly to pieces of channel iron attached to a farm implement. This method allowed us to plant the geophones in the ground quickly and automatically. The rigidly interconnected geophones used in these earlier studies detected first‐arrival energy along with minor interfering seismic modes, but they did not detect seismic reflections. To examine further the feasibility of developing rigid geophone emplacement systems to detect seismic reflections, we experimented with four pieces of channel iron, each 2.7 m long and 10 cm wide. Each segment was equipped with 18 geophones rigidly attached to the channel iron at 15‐cm intervals, and the spikes attached to all 18 geophones were pushed into the ground simultaneously. The geophones detected both refracted and reflected energy; however, no significant signal distortion or interference attributable to the rigid coupling of the geophones to the channel iron was observed in the data. The interfering seismic modes mentioned from the previous experiments were not detected, nor was any P‐wave propagation noted within the channel iron. These results show promise for automating and reducing the cost of ultrashallow seismic reflection and refraction surveys.


1988 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Goleby ◽  
C. Wright ◽  
C. D. N. Collins ◽  
B. L. N. Kennett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document