scholarly journals Mesoscale model cloud scheme assessment using satellite observations

2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (D16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Chaboureau
2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 5190-5207 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Kay ◽  
B. R. Hillman ◽  
S. A. Klein ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
B. Medeiros ◽  
...  

Abstract Satellite observations and their corresponding instrument simulators are used to document global cloud biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) versions 4 and 5. The model–observation comparisons show that, despite having nearly identical cloud radiative forcing, CAM5 has a much more realistic representation of cloud properties than CAM4. In particular, CAM5 exhibits substantial improvement in three long-standing climate model cloud biases: 1) the underestimation of total cloud, 2) the overestimation of optically thick cloud, and 3) the underestimation of midlevel cloud. While the increased total cloud and decreased optically thick cloud in CAM5 result from improved physical process representation, the increased midlevel cloud in CAM5 results from the addition of radiatively active snow. Despite these improvements, both CAM versions have cloud deficiencies. Of particular concern, both models exhibit large but differing biases in the subtropical marine boundary layer cloud regimes that are known to explain intermodel differences in cloud feedbacks and climate sensitivity. More generally, this study demonstrates that simulator-facilitated evaluation of cloud properties, such as amount by vertical level and optical depth, can robustly expose large and at times radiatively compensating climate model cloud biases.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1337-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Chaboureau ◽  
Nathalie Söhne ◽  
Jean-Pierre Pinty ◽  
Ingo Meirold-Mautner ◽  
Eric Defer ◽  
...  

Abstract The simulations of five midlatitude precipitating events by the nonhydrostatic mesoscale model Méso-NH are analyzed. These cases cover contrasted precipitation situations from 30° to 60°N, which are typical of midlatitudes. They include a frontal case with light precipitation over the Rhine River area (10 February 2000), a long-lasting precipitation event at Hoek van Holland, Netherlands (19 September 2001), a moderate rain case over the Elbe (12 August 2002), an intense rain case over Algiers (10 November 2001), and the “millennium storm” in the United Kingdom (30 October 2000). The physically consistent hydrometeor and thermodynamic outputs are used to generate a database for cloud and precipitation retrievals. The hydrometeor vertical profiles that were generated vary mostly with the 0°C isotherm, located between 1 and 3 km in height depending on the case. The characteristics of this midlatitude database are complementary to the GPROF database, which mostly concentrates on tropical situations. The realism of the simulations is evaluated against satellite observations by comparing synthetic brightness temperatures (BTs) with Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU), Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I), and Meteosat observations. The good reproduction of the BT distributions by the model is exploited by calculating categorical scores for verification purposes. The comparison with 3-hourly Meteosat observations demonstrates the ability of the model to forecast the time evolution of the cloud cover, the latter being better predicted for the stratiform cases than for others. The comparison with AMSU-B measurements shows the skill of the model to predict rainfall at the correct location.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 461-468
Author(s):  
S. Takagi

In this article, we intended to see whether we can obtain the same pole motion from two kinds of telescopes: the floating zenith telescope (PZT) and the ILS zenith telescope (VZT). The observations with the PZT have been pursued since 1967.0 with a star list whose star places are taken from the PK4 and its supplement. We revised the method of reduction of the observations with the PZT by adopting a variable scale value for the photographic plate (Takagi et al., 1974).


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
O.F. Tyrnov ◽  
◽  
Yu.P. Fedorenko ◽  
L.F. Chernogor ◽  
◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 19-29
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Kostyuchenko ◽  
◽  
I.M. Kopachevskyi ◽  
D.M. Solovyov ◽  
M.V. Yushchenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document