scholarly journals Correction to “Background reduction for quiet time particle fluxes aboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory” by E. Valtonen et al.

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (A12) ◽  
pp. 29417-29417
Author(s):  
E. Valtonen ◽  
K. Kecskeméty ◽  
H. Kunow ◽  
P. Király ◽  
R. Müller-Mellin ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (A6) ◽  
pp. 10705-10714 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Valtonen ◽  
K. Kecskeméty ◽  
H. Kunow ◽  
R. Müller-Mellin ◽  
J. Torsti

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.N. Ishkov ◽  
M.A. Zeldovich ◽  
K. Kecskeméty ◽  
Yu.I. Logachev
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blaire P. Umhau ◽  
◽  
Laura Motta ◽  
J.D. Blum ◽  
Brian Popp ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 155-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Noci

In the past years several space missions have been proposed for the study of the Sun and of the Heliosphere. These missions were intended to clarify various different aspects of solar physics. For example, the GRIST (Grazing Incidence Solar Telescope) mission was intended as a means to improve our knowledge of the upper transition region and low corona through the detection of the solar EUV spectrum with a spatial resolution larger than in previous missions; the DISCO (Dual Spectral Irradiance and Solar Constant Orbiter) and SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) missions were proposed to gat observational data about the solar oscillations better than those obtained from ground based instruments; the SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) mission was initially proposed to combine the properties of GRIST with the study of the extended corona (up to several radii of heliocentric distance) by observing the scattered Ly-alpha and OVI radiation, which was also the basis of the SCE (Solar Corona Explorer) mission proposal; the development of the interest about the variability of the Sun, both in itself and for its consequences in the history of the Earth, led to propose observations of the solar constant (included in DISCO).


1966 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1399-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. D. Cummings ◽  
R. E. Laquey ◽  
Brian J. O'Brien ◽  
Martin Walt
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M Morris ◽  
Susanna E Kitts-Morgan ◽  
Dawn M Spangler ◽  
Kyle R McLeod ◽  
David L Harmon

Abstract Growing public interest in and use of Cannabidiol (CBD) in companion animals has amplified the need to elucidate potential impacts. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of CBD on daily activity of adult dogs. Twenty-four dogs (18.0 ± 3.4 kg) were utilized in a randomized complete block design with treatments consisting of control, 2 mg CBD/kg BW/d, and 4 mg CBD/kg BW/d split between two treats administered after twice-daily exercise (7:00-9:00 and 17:00-19:00). Four hours each day (10:00-12:00, AM and 13:30-15:30, PM), were designated as time when no persons entered the kennels, with 2 h designated as Quiet Time and the other 2 h as Music Time, where calming music played over speakers. Quiet and Music sessions were randomly allotted to daily AM or PM times. Activity monitors were fitted to dogs’ collars for continuous collection of activity parameters. Data were collected over a 2-wk baseline period to block dogs by activity level (high or low) before randomly assigning dogs within each block to treatments. After 1 wk of treatment adaptation, activity parameters were collected for 2 wk. Data were tested for normality using the UNIVARIATE procedure in SAS before examining differences using the MIXED procedure in SAS, including effects of treatment, day, session (Quiet or Music), time of day (AM or PM), and accompanying interactions. CBD did not alter total activity points (P = 0.9971) or activity duration (P = 0.8776). CBD tended (P = 0.0692) to reduce scratching compared to control. Irrespective of treatment, dogs were more active in PM than AM (P < 0.0001). Regardless of session, dogs receiving 4 mg/kg/d tended (P = 0.0914) to be less active in the PM than control. CBD did not affect activity duration during exercise periods (P = 0.1425), but dogs receiving CBD ran more than control (P = 0.0339). These results indicate that when supplemented up to 4 mg/kg/d, CBD does not negatively impact daily activity levels of dogs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document