scholarly journals Segmentation in gravity and magnetic anomalies along the U.S. East Coast passive margin: Implications for incipient structure of the oceanic lithosphere

2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (B11) ◽  
pp. 25769-25790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Behn ◽  
Jian Lin
Keyword(s):  
East Coast ◽  
Magnetic Anomalies ◽  
Oceanic Lithosphere ◽  
Passive Margin ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic ◽  
The U.S

A DIRECT COMPUTATION OF GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC ANOMALIES CAUSED BY 2- AND 3-DIMENSIONAL BODIES OF ARBITRARY SHAPE AND ARBITRARY MAGNETIC POLARIZATION BY EQUIVALENT‐POINT METHOD AND A SIMPLIFIED CUBIC SPLINE

Geophysics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 610-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao C. Ku
Keyword(s):  
Arbitrary Shape ◽  
Gaussian Quadrature ◽  
Magnetic Anomalies ◽  
Cubic Spline ◽  
The Body ◽  
Point Method ◽  
Magnetic Polarization ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Equivalent Point ◽  
Gravity And Magnetic

A computational method, which combines the Gaussian quadrature formula for numerical integration and a cubic spline for interpolation in evaluating the limits of integration, is employed to compute directly the gravity and magnetic anomalies caused by 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization. The mathematics involved in this method is indeed old and well known. Furthermore, the physical concept of the Gaussian quadrature integration leads us back to the old concept of equivalent point masses or equivalent magnetic point dipoles: namely, the gravity or magnetic anomaly due to a body can be evaluated simply by a number of equivalent points which are distributed in the “Gaussian way” within the body. As an illustration, explicit formulas are given for dikes and prisms using 2 × 2 and 2 × 2 × 2 point Gaussian quadrature formulas. The basic limitation in the equivalent‐point method is that the distance between the point of observation and the equivalent points must be larger than the distance between the equivalent points within the body. By using a reasonable number of equivalent points or dividing the body into a number of smaller subbodies, the method might provide a useful alternative for computing in gravity and magnetic methods. The use of a simplified cubic spline enables us to compute the gravity and magnetic anomalies due to bodies of arbitrary shape and arbitrary magnetic polarization with ease and a certain degree of accuracy. This method also appears to be quite attractive for terrain corrections in gravity and possibly in magnetic surveys.

The Heterogeneous Tethyan Oceanic Lithosphere of the Alpine Ophiolites

Elements ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Rampone ◽  
Alessio Sanfilippo
Keyword(s):  
Oceanic Lithosphere ◽  
Passive Margin ◽  
Crustal Material ◽  
Crustal Accretion ◽  
Mantle Dynamics ◽  
Western Tethys ◽  
Mantle Peridotites ◽  
Slow Spreading ◽  
Tethys Ocean ◽  
Basaltic Crust

The Alpine–Apennine ophiolites are lithospheric remnants of the Jurassic Alpine Tethys Ocean. They predominantly consist of exhumed mantle peridotites with lesser gabbroic and basaltic crust and are locally associated with continental crustal material, indicating formation in an environment transitional from an ultra-slow-spreading seafloor to a hyperextended passive margin. These ophiolites represent a unique window into mantle dynamics and crustal accretion in an ultra-slow-spreading extensional environment. Old, pre-Alpine, lithosphere is locally preserved within the mantle sequences: these have been largely modified by reaction with migrating asthenospheric melts. These reactions were active in both the mantle and the crust and have played a key role in creating the heterogeneous oceanic lithosphere in this branch of the Mesozoic Western Tethys.

scholarly journals Social Samaritan Justice: When and Why Needy Fellow Citizens Have a Right to Assistance

2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURA VALENTINI
Keyword(s):  
East Coast ◽  
Double Standard ◽  
Hurricane Sandy ◽  
Material Resources ◽  
Resource Transfers ◽  
Political Communities ◽  
The Needy ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Do So

In late 2012, Hurricane Sandy hit the East Coast of the U.S., causing much suffering and devastation. Those who could have easily helped Sandy's victims had a duty to do so. But was this a rightfully enforceable duty of justice, or a nonenforceable duty of beneficence? The answer to this question is often thought to depend on the kind of help offered: the provision of immediate bodily services is not enforceable; the transfer of material resources is. I argue that this double standard is unjustified, and defend a version of what I call “social samaritanism.” On this view, within political communities, the duty to help the needy—whether via bodily services or resource transfers—is always an enforceable demand of justice, except when the needy are reckless; across independent political communities, it is always a matter of beneficence. I defend this alternative double standard, and consider its implications for the case of Sandy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document