scholarly journals Acceleration of ionospheric O+ions on open field lines in the low-latitude boundary layer and the cusp region.

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (A12) ◽  
pp. 29611-29618 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Krauklis ◽  
A. D. Johnstone ◽  
W. K. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Open Field ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Cusp Region ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer

scholarly journals Ionospheric signatures of the low-latitude boundary layer under conditions of northward IMF and small clock angle

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2169-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Pryse ◽  
R. W. Sims ◽  
J. Moen ◽  
K. Oksavik
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Particle Energy ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Central Plasma ◽  
High Latitude Ionosphere ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Lobe Reconnection ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer

Abstract. A case study is presented that concerns the footprints of the low-latitude boundary layer in the high-latitude ionosphere. The measurements were made near local magnetic noon in summertime under conditions of Bz>0 and small clock angle. Of particular interest are particle fluxes measured in the region by the NOAA-12 satellite that revealed energetic (>30 keV) electrons, characteristic of trapped particles, together with a population of softer precipitating magnetosheath particles. The particle energy-distribution was distinct from those identifying the central plasma sheet at lower latitudes. On its poleward side the layer extended to at least the latitude of the polar cap boundary as identified in ion flows and electron densities measured by the EISCAT Svalbard radar. It is proposed that the particles of the low-latitude boundary layer occurred on newly-closed magnetic field lines, which were formed by the closure of open polar cap field by lobe reconnection in both Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

Low-latitude boundary layer near noon: An open field line model

1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (A9) ◽  
pp. 17367 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Lyons ◽  
M. Schulz ◽  
D. C. Pridmore-Brown ◽  
J. L. Roeder
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Field Line ◽  
Open Field ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Line Model ◽  
Open Field Line ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer

scholarly journals Energy and pitch-angle dispersions of LLBL/cusp ions seen at middle altitudes: predictions by the open magnetosphere model

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1501-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lockwood
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pitch Angle ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Ion Distribution ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer ◽  
Instrument Sensitivity

Abstract. Numerical simulations are presented of the ion distribution functions seen by middle-altitude spacecraft in the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL) and cusp regions when reconnection is, or has recently been, taking place at the equatorial magnetopause. From the evolution of the distribution function with time elapsed since the field line was opened, both the observed energy/observation-time and pitch-angle/energy dispersions are well reproduced. Distribution functions showing a mixture of magnetosheath and magnetospheric ions, often thought to be a signature of the LLBL, are found on newly opened field lines as a natural consequence of the magnetopause effects on the ions and their flight times. In addition, it is shown that the extent of the source region of the magnetosheath ions that are detected by a satellite is a function of the sensitivity of the ion instrument . If the instrument one-count level is high (and/or solar-wind densities are low), the cusp ion precipitation detected comes from a localised region of the mid-latitude magnetopause (around the magnetic cusp), even though the reconnection takes place at the equatorial magnetopause. However, if the instrument sensitivity is high enough, then ions injected from a large segment of the dayside magnetosphere (in the relevant hemisphere) will be detected in the cusp. Ion precipitation classed as LLBL is shown to arise from the low-latitude magnetopause, irrespective of the instrument sensitivity. Adoption of threshold flux definitions has the same effect as instrument sensitivity in artificially restricting the apparent source regionKey words. Low-latitude boundary layer · Cusp regions · Open magnetosphere model · Mid-altitudes

scholarly journals Investigation of the outer and inner low-latitude boundary layers

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1065-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Bauer ◽  
R. A. Treumann ◽  
W. Baumjohann
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Tangential Stress ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Alfven Wave ◽  
Bulk Velocity ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer

Abstract. We analyze 22 AMPTE/IRM crossings of the day-side low-latitude boundary layer for which a dense outer part can be distinguished from a dilute inner part. Whereas the plasma in the outer boundary layer (OBL) is dominated by solar wind particles, the partial densities of solar wind and magnetospheric particles are comparable in the inner boundary layer (IBL). For 11 events we find a reasonable agreement between observed plasma flows and those predicted by the tangential stress balance of an open magnetopause. Thus, we conclude that, at least in these cases, the OBL is formed by a local magnetic reconnection. The disagreement with the tangential stress balance in the other 11 cases might be due to reconnection being time-dependent and patchy. The north-south component of the proton bulk velocity in the boundary layer is, on average, directed toward high latitudes for both low and high magnetic shear across the magnetopause. This argues clearly against the possibility that the dayside low-latitude boundary layer is populated with solar wind plasma primarily from the cusps. "Warm", counterstreaming electrons that originate primarily from the magnetosheath and have a field-aligned temperature that is higher than the electron temperature in the magnetosheath by a factor of 1–5, are a characteristic feature of the IBL. Profiles of the proton bulk velocity and the density of hot ring current electrons provide evidence that the IBL is on closed field lines. Part of the IBL may be on newly opened field lines. Using the average spectra of electric and magnetic fluctuations in the boundary layer, we estimate the diffusion caused by lower hybrid drift instability, gyroresonant pitch angle scattering, or kinetic Alfvén wave turbulence. We find that cross-field diffusion cannot transport solar wind plasma into the OBL or IBL at a rate that would account for the thickness ( ~ 1000 km) of these sublayers. On the duskside, the dawn-dusk component of the proton bulk velocity in the IBL and magnetosphere is, on average, directed from the nightside toward local noon. Formation of the IBL may also be due to mechanisms operating in the magnetotail.Key words. Magnetospheric physics (magnetopause, cusp and boundary layer; magnetospheath)

The Viscous Magnetosphere

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles F. Kennel
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Radial Distance ◽  
Velocity Shear ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Viscous Interaction ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Solar Wind Origin ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer

This chapter describes how the magnetosphere is shaped by the tangential shear stress exerted at the magnetopause by collisionless viscosity. In Section 4.2, we discuss the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL), which contains plasma of solar wind origin that has been transported across the magnetopause current layer. The velocity shear in the LLBL drives field-aligned currents into the ionosphere on the morning side and out of the ionosphere on the evening side (Section 4.3). These currents are of the appropriate sense to drive two-cell convection in the highlatitude ionosphere. The footprint of the LLBL in the ionosphere to which the field aligned currents connect is clearly identifiable by its characteristic particle precipitation (Section 4.4). The shear in the LLBL also generates 1-20 mHz PC 4- 5 micropulsations whose polarizations, tailward propagation, and phase speeds are consistent with the Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) instability (Section 4.5). The K-H vortices may couple to “vortex auroras” in the local afternoon sector of the auroral oval (Section 4.6). Vortex auroral dissipation may be responsible for a morningevening asymmetry in the viscous interaction and its manifestations. Organized vortical flows have been observed not only next to the magnetopause, but also near the center of the plasma sheet, accompanied by local quasiperiodic magnetic field oscillations and PC 5 micropulsations on the ground (Section 4.7). In Section 4.8, we discuss observations of a thick boundary layer flow on closed field lines next to the magnetopause 220 RE downstream. This puts us in a position to estimate the rates of particle and energy injection into the magnetosphere due to the viscous interaction (Section 4.9). Spacecraft crossings of the magnetopause last from a few seconds to a few minutes and are characterized by a rapid, distinct rotation of the magnetic field and striking changes in plasma density, pressure, flow velocity, composition, and energetic particle distribution (Williams, 1979a; 1980; Williams et al., 1979). A broader boundary layer lies just inside the magnetopause. The so-called low-latitude boundary layer was first identified at 18 RE radial distance in the magnetotail using Vela 4B (Hones et al., 1972) and Vela 5 and 6 (Akasofu et al., 1973b) low-energy plasma measurements.

scholarly journals Statistical study of the location and size of the electron edge of the Low-Latitude Boundary Layer as observed by Cluster at mid-altitudes

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2645-2665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. V. Bogdanova ◽  
C. J. Owen ◽  
A. N. Fazakerley ◽  
B. Klecker ◽  
H. Rème
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Statistical Study ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
Low Latitude Boundary Layer ◽  
The Imf

Abstract. The nature of particle precipitations at dayside mid-altitudes can be interpreted in terms of the evolution of reconnected field lines. Due to the difference between electron and ion parallel velocities, two distinct boundary layers should be observed at mid-altitudes between the boundary between open and closed field lines and the injections in the cusp proper. At lowest latitudes, the electron-dominated boundary layer, named the "electron edge" of the Low-Latitude Boundary Layer (LLBL), contains soft-magnetosheath electrons but only high-energy ions of plasma sheet origin. A second layer, the LLBL proper, is a mixture of both ions and electrons with characteristic magnetosheath energies. The Cluster spacecraft frequently observe these two boundary layers. We present an illustrative example of a Cluster mid-altitude cusp crossing with an extended electron edge of the LLBL. This electron edge contains 10–200 eV, low-density, isotropic electrons, presumably originating from the solar wind halo population. These are occasionally observed with bursts of parallel and/or anti-parallel-directed electron beams with higher fluxes, which are possibly accelerated near the magnetopause X-line. We then use 3 years of data from mid-altitude cusp crossings (327 events) to carry out a statistical study of the location and size of the electron edge of the LLBL. We find that the equatorward boundary of the LLBL electron edge is observed at 10:00–17:00 magnetic local time (MLT) and is located typically between 68° and 80° invariant latitude (ILAT). The location of the electron edge shows a weak, but significant, dependence on some of the external parameters (solar wind pressure, and IMF BZ- component), in agreement with expectations from previous studies of the cusp location. The latitudinal extent of the electron edge has been estimated using new multi-spacecraft techniques. The Cluster tetrahedron crosses the electron and ion boundaries of the LLBL/cusp with time delays of 1–40 min between spacecraft. We reconstruct the motion of the electron boundary between observations by different spacecraft to improve the accuracy of the estimation of the boundary layer size. In our study, the LLBL electron edge is distinctly observed in 87% of mid-altitude LLBL/cusp crossings with clear electron and ion equatorward boundaries equivalent to 35% of all LLBL/cusp crossings by Cluster. The size of this region varied between 0°–2° ILAT with a median value of 0.2° ILAT. Generally, the size of the LLBL electron edge depends on the combination of many parameters. However, we find an anti-correlation between the size of this region and the strength of the IMF, the absolute values of the IMF BY- and BZ-components and the solar wind dynamic pressure, as is expected from a simple reconnection model for the origin of this region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document