scholarly journals The profile of the hydrogen Hβemission line in proton aurora

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (A1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lummerzheim ◽  
M. Galand
Keyword(s):  
Proton Aurora

Magnetospheric Dynamics and the Proton Aurora

2012 ◽  
pp. 365-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Donovan ◽  
E. Spanswick ◽  
J. Liang ◽  
J. Grant ◽  
B. Jackel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetospheric Dynamics ◽  
Proton Aurora

scholarly journals Emission of OI(630 nm) in proton aurora

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (A1) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lummerzheim ◽  
M. Galand ◽  
J. Semeter ◽  
M. J. Mendillo ◽  
M. H. Rees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proton Aurora

scholarly journals Proton Aurora on Mars: A Dayside Phenomenon Pervasive in Southern Summer

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (12) ◽  
pp. 10533-10548
Author(s):  
Andréa Hughes ◽  
Michael Chaffin ◽  
Edwin Mierkiewicz ◽  
Justin Deighan ◽  
Sonal Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proton Aurora

scholarly journals Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: Effects of proton precipitation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold K. Knight
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Optical Emission ◽  
Electron Precipitation ◽  
E Region ◽  
Emission Models ◽  
Proton Precipitation ◽  
Far Ultraviolet ◽  
Proton Aurora ◽  
Remote Sensing Methods

Abstract. Coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared for the purpose of determining whether auroral FUV remote sensing algorithms that assume pure electron precipitation are biased in the presence of proton precipitation. Auroral particle transport and optical emission models, such as the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) model, predict that maximum E region electron density (NmE) values derived from auroral Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) emission assuming electron precipitation will be biased high by up to ~ 20 % for pure proton aurora, while comparisons between LBH radiances and radiances derived from in situ particle flux observations (i.e., Knight et al., 2008, 2012) indicate that the bias associated with proton aurora should be much larger. Surprisingly, in the comparisons with ionosonde observations described here, no bias associated with proton aurora is found in FUV-derived auroral NmE, which means that auroral FUV remote sensing methods for NmE are more accurate in the presence of proton precipitation than was suggested in the aforementioned earlier works. Possible explanations for the discrepancy with the earlier results are discussed.

scholarly journals Determining the mechanism of cusp proton aurora

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuliang Xiao ◽  
Qiugang Zong ◽  
Zhenpeng Su ◽  
Chang Yang ◽  
Zhaoguo He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proton Aurora

Jovian proton Aurora

Icarus ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Heaps ◽  
B.C. Edgar ◽  
A.E.S. Green
Keyword(s):  
Proton Aurora
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document