Synthesis and x-ray crystallographic characterization of the binuclear iron complexes cyclic (CO)3Fe(.mu.-PPh2)(.eta.2-(C,P)-.mu.-CH(CN)PPh2)Fe(CO)3 and cyclic (CO)3Fe(.mu.-PPh2)(.eta.2-(P,P')-.mu.-Ph2PC(CN)PPh2)Fe(CO)3

1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Fu. Yu ◽  
Andrew. Wojcicki ◽  
Mario. Calligaris ◽  
Giorgio. Nardin
Keyword(s):  
Iron Complexes ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Binuclear Iron

Synthesis and X-ray crystallographic characterization of copper and iron complexes with tetradentate-N4 ligands: Reactivity towards catechol oxidation

Polyhedron ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 2921-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anangamohan Panja ◽  
Sanchita Goswami ◽  
Nizamuddin Shaikh ◽  
Partha Roy ◽  
Mario Manassero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Complexes ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Catechol Oxidation

scholarly journals Synthesis and Characterization of Bidentate Isonitrile Iron Complexes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Till ◽  
John A. Kelly ◽  
Christoph G. P. Ziegler ◽  
Robert Wolf ◽  
Tianao Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Species ◽  
Ir Spectroscopy ◽  
Iron Complexes ◽  
Molecular Structures ◽  
Synthesis And Characterization ◽  
Carbonyl Complexes ◽  
Subsequent Reduction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
X Ray Crystallography

Divalent iron complexes trans-[FeBr2(BINC)2], [Cp*FeCl(BINC)] (Cp* = Me5C5) and [FeBr2(CNAr3NC)2] with chelat-ing bis(isonitrile) ligands BINC (bis(2-isocyanophenyl)phenylphosphonate) and CNAr3NC (2,2’’-diisocyano-3,5,3’’,5’’tetramethyl-1,1’:3’,1’’-terphenyl) have been prepared and characterized. Their subsequent reduction yields di- and trinuclear compounds [Fe3(BINC)6], [Cp*Fe(BINC)]2, [Fe(CNAr3NC)2]2 and [K(Et2O)]2[Fe(CNAr3NC)2]2. The molecular structures of all new species were determined by X-ray crystallography. The molecular structures are compared to related iron carbonyl complexes. The complexes were further characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy, and the electrochemical properties of selected compounds were analyzed by UV-Vis-NIR spectroelectrochemistry. <br>

Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Two Iron Complexes

2011 ◽  
Vol 492 ◽  
pp. 324-327
Author(s):  
Ya Wei Hu ◽  
Yang Min Ma
Keyword(s):  
Solvothermal Synthesis ◽  
Layer Structure ◽  
Iron Complexes ◽  
Synthesis And Characterization ◽  
Molecular Architecture ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Space Group ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Cell Parameters

Two iron complexes, Fe3(dtdb)2(HCO2)2(DMF)2(H2O)2(1) and Fe(bpy)(Hdtdb)(H2O) (2) were solvothermally synthesized and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Fe3(dtdb)2(HCO2)2(DMF)2(H2O)2 (1) shows 2D layer structure crystallized in a triclinic with space group P-1 and cell parameters, a = 8.5591(10) nm, b = 11.2502(13) nm, c = 11.4370(14) nm, α = 90.687(2)º, β = 110.275(2)º , γ = 90.712(2)º, and Z = 1. Fe(bpy)(Hdtdb)(H2O) (2) shows surper- molecular architecture crystallized in a triclinic with space group P-1 and cell parameters, a = 8.286(12) nm, b = 11.5937(16) nm, c = 11.8477(17) nm, α = 93.932(3)º, β = 102.442(3)º, γ = 97.117(3)º, and Z = 1.

scholarly journals Synthesis and Characterization of Bidentate Isonitrile Iron Complexes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Till ◽  
John A. Kelly ◽  
Christoph G. P. Ziegler ◽  
Robert Wolf ◽  
Tianao Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Species ◽  
Ir Spectroscopy ◽  
Iron Complexes ◽  
Molecular Structures ◽  
Synthesis And Characterization ◽  
Carbonyl Complexes ◽  
Subsequent Reduction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
X Ray Crystallography

Divalent iron complexes trans-[FeBr2(BINC)2], [Cp*FeCl(BINC)] (Cp* = Me5C5) and [FeBr2(CNAr3NC)2] with chelat-ing bis(isonitrile) ligands BINC (bis(2-isocyanophenyl)phenylphosphonate) and CNAr3NC (2,2’’-diisocyano-3,5,3’’,5’’tetramethyl-1,1’:3’,1’’-terphenyl) have been prepared and characterized. Their subsequent reduction yields di- and trinuclear compounds [Fe3(BINC)6], [Cp*Fe(BINC)]2, [Fe(CNAr3NC)2]2 and [K(Et2O)]2[Fe(CNAr3NC)2]2. The molecular structures of all new species were determined by X-ray crystallography. The molecular structures are compared to related iron carbonyl complexes. The complexes were further characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy, and the electrochemical properties of selected compounds were analyzed by UV-Vis-NIR spectroelectrochemistry. <br>

The Use of Advanced Analytical Techniques for Characterization of the Chemical, Physical, and Crystallographic Nature of a Surface

1973 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 132-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Herfert
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Past ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Electron

Studies of the nature of a surface, either metallic or nonmetallic, in the past, have been limited to the instrumentation available for these measurements. In the past, optical microscopy, replica transmission electron microscopy, electron or X-ray diffraction and optical or X-ray spectroscopy have provided the means of surface characterization. Actually, some of these techniques are not purely surface; the depth of penetration may be a few thousands of an inch. Within the last five years, instrumentation has been made available which now makes it practical for use to study the outer few 100A of layers and characterize it completely from a chemical, physical, and crystallographic standpoint. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) provides a means of viewing the surface of a material in situ to magnifications as high as 250,000X.

High Resolution Replication of Organoclay Surfaces

1982 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 576-577
Author(s):  
W. W. Barker ◽  
W. E. Rigsby ◽  
V. J. Hurst ◽  
W. J. Humphreys
Keyword(s):  
Clay Mineral ◽  
Organic Molecule ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Xrd Pattern ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Silicate Layers ◽  
Mineral Identification

Experimental clay mineral-organic molecule complexes long have been known and some of them have been extensively studied by X-ray diffraction methods. The organic molecules are adsorbed onto the surfaces of the clay minerals, or intercalated between the silicate layers. Natural organo-clays also are widely recognized but generally have not been well characterized. Widely used techniques for clay mineral identification involve treatment of the sample with H2 O2 or other oxidant to destroy any associated organics. This generally simplifies and intensifies the XRD pattern of the clay residue, but helps little with the characterization of the original organoclay. Adequate techniques for the direct observation of synthetic and naturally occurring organoclays are yet to be developed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document