scholarly journals Theoretical Description of the Role of Halides, Silver, and Surfactants on the Structure of Gold Nanorods

Nano Letters ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 871-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neyvis Almora-Barrios ◽  
Gerard Novell-Leruth ◽  
Peter Whiting ◽  
Luis M. Liz-Marzán ◽  
Núria López
Author(s):  
Mrigank Verma ◽  
Manabendra Chandra

Here, we demonstrate the utility of the second harmonic generation (SHG) for refractometric sensing in the solution phase. We employ an aqueous colloid of gold nanorods as our sensors and,...


Optik ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 168352
Author(s):  
T.A. Chevychelova ◽  
A.I. Zvyagin ◽  
A.S. Perepelitsa ◽  
O.V. Ovchinnikov ◽  
M.S. Smirnov ◽  
...  

Synthese ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Dougherty

Abstract Elay Shech and John Earman have recently argued that the common topological interpretation of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect is unsatisfactory because it fails to justify idealizations that it presupposes. In particular, they argue that an adequate account of the AB effect must address the role of boundary conditions in certain ideal cases of the effect. In this paper I defend the topological interpretation against their criticisms. I consider three types of idealization that might arise in treatments of the effect. First, Shech takes the AB effect to involve an idealization in the form of a singular limit, analogous to the thermodynamic limit in statistical mechanics. But, I argue, the AB effect itself features no singular limits, so it doesn’t involve idealizations in this sense. Second, I argue that Shech and Earman’s emphasis on the role of boundary conditions in the AB effect is misplaced. The idealizations that are useful in connecting the theoretical description of the AB effect to experiment do interact with facts about boundary conditions, but none of these idealizations are presupposed by the topological interpretation of the effect. Indeed, the boundary conditions for which Shech and demands justification are incompatible with some instances of the AB effect, so the topological interpretation ought not justify them. Finally, I address the role of the non-relativistic approximation usually presumed in discussions of the AB effect. This approximation is essential if—as the topological interpretation supposes—the AB effect constrains and justifies a relativistic theory of the electromagnetic interaction. In this case the ends justify the means. So the topological view presupposes no unjustified idealizations.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (19) ◽  
pp. 3633-3640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Gole ◽  
Catherine J. Murphy
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 6177 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Boulais ◽  
A. Robitaille ◽  
P. Desjeans-Gauthier ◽  
M. Meunier

Author(s):  
Setareh Monshi Toussi ◽  
Marco Zanella ◽  
Gaser Nagah Abdelrasoul ◽  
Athanassia Athanassiou ◽  
Francesca Pignatelli

Nanoscale ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (35) ◽  
pp. 16830-16838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Szychowski ◽  
Haixu Leng ◽  
Matthew Pelton ◽  
Marie-Christine Daniel

Cysteamine has a concentration-dependent dual-role of ligand and etchant which leads to controlled etching/tapering of gold nanorods with silica coating.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document