Adipogenic Differentiation of Individual Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Different Geometric Micropatterns

Langmuir ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 6155-6162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Song ◽  
Hongxu Lu ◽  
Naoki Kawazoe ◽  
Guoping Chen
2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1673-1684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Liu ◽  
Xiaoxiao He ◽  
Kemin Wang ◽  
Chunmei He ◽  
Hui Shi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (S) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Umul Hanim Yusoff ◽  
Shamsi Ebrahimi

Background: A nifty propagating of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) diligence has germinated all over the world by innovative investigators. However, the clinical and basic research applications of MSC requires novel finding biomaterials interfacial interaction especially in sustainable the morphology, physiology, multipotent and phenotypically in long-term cultivation. A prominent of biomaterials benefit to MSCs culture has triggered the multitudinous field especially in regenerative medicine. In order to hinder the deprivation of MSCs in purity and potency, the alternative cell-substrate materials of MSCs culture is essentially to be discovered. This has instigated the idea to encountered the method of screening libraries organic and inorganics biomaterials in bio-adhesively, free ethically, and sustainability to support the morphologically, physiologically, multi-potent and phenotypically of substrates coating cover slip.  Methods: Libraries of inorganic biomaterials substrates have been collected from co-researcher to conduct the initial screening phase of 100 myriad fabrications of substrates whereas enumerated as a Graphene Oxide (GO), Hydroxyapatite (HAp), and Bioactive Glass (BAG) coated cover slip and discs also several organic biomaterials. Wharton’s Jelly derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (WJMSCs) and Denuded Amnion Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AMMSCs) have been seeded on each substrate in the 48-well plate. Top four leading substrates have been selected for further cultivation until up to 5 passage (>P5) for long term screening known as scaling up phase. Several parameters such as cell attachment, cell viability, kinetic growth, cell-materials osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation and cell phenotype have been analyzed. Top one cell-material culture will go forward to further long-term cultivation up to Passage 10(>P10).  Results: Morphologically and phenotypically demonstrated that GOy1WJMSC showed the significance result among others.


2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Da Ros ◽  
Luca Persano ◽  
Dario Bizzotto ◽  
Mariagrazia Michieli ◽  
Paola Braghetta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dissection of mechanisms involved in the regulation of bone marrow microenvironment through cell–cell and cell–matrix contacts is essential for the detailed understanding of processes underlying bone marrow activities both under physiological conditions and in hematologic malignancies. Here we describe Emilin-2 as an abundant extracellular matrix component of bone marrow stroma. Methods Immunodetection of Emilin-2 was performed in bone marrow sections of mice from 30 days to 6 months of age. Emilin-2 expression was monitored in vitro in primary and mesenchymal stem cell lines under undifferentiated and adipogenic conditions. Hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors in bone marrow of 3- to 10-month-old wild-type and Emilin-2 null mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results Emilin-2 is deposited in bone marrow extracellular matrix in an age-dependent manner, forming a meshwork that extends from compact bone boundaries to the central trabecular regions. Emilin-2 is expressed and secreted by both primary and immortalized bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, exerting an inhibitory action in adipogenic differentiation. In vivo Emilin-2 deficiency impairs the frequency of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in bone marrow during aging. Conclusion Our data provide new insights in the contribution of bone marrow extracellular matrix microenvironment in the regulation of stem cell niches and hematopoietic progenitor differentiation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 9323
Author(s):  
Linshan Xu ◽  
Yuyang Wang ◽  
Jianping Wang ◽  
Jianglong Zhai ◽  
Li Ren ◽  
...  

Cellular senescence and its senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) are widely regarded as promising therapeutic targets for aging-related diseases, such as osteoporosis. However, the expression pattern of cellular senescence and multiple SASP secretion remains unclear, thus leaving a large gap in the knowledge for a desirable intervention targeting cellular senescence. Therefore, there is a critical need to understand the molecular mechanism of SASP secretion in the bone microenvironment that can ameliorate aging-related degenerative pathologies including osteoporosis. In this study, osteocyte-like cells (MLO-Y4) were induced to cellular senescence by 2 Gy γ-rays; then, senescence phenotype changes and adverse effects of SASP on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) differentiation potential were investigated. The results revealed that 2 Gy irradiation could hinder cell viability, shorten cell dendrites, and induce cellular senescence, as evidenced by the higher expression of senescence markers p16 and p21 and the elevated formation of senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF), which was accompanied by the enhanced secretion of SASP markers such as IL-1α, IL-6, MMP-3, IGFBP-6, resistin, and adiponectin. When 0.8 μM JAK1 inhibitors were added to block SASP secretion, the higher expression of SASP was blunted, but the inhibition in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential of BMSCs co-cultured with irradiated MLO-Y4 cell conditioned medium (CM- 2 Gy) was alleviated. These results suggest that senescent osteocytes can perturb BMSCs’ differential potential via the paracrine signaling of SASP, which was also demonstrated by in vivo experiments. In conclusion, we identified the SASP factor partially responsible for the degenerative differentiation of BMSCs, which allowed us to hypothesize that senescent osteocytes and their SASPs may contribute to radiation-induced bone loss.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 3656-3662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Runguang Li ◽  
Liang Liang ◽  
Yonggang Dou ◽  
Zeping Huang ◽  
Huiting Mo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document