Broad-spectrum synthesis of enantiomerically pure lactones. 1. Synthesis of sex pheromones of the carpenter bee, rove beetle, Japanese beetle, black-tailed deer, and Oriental hornet

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. 2169-2175 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Pirkle ◽  
Paul E. Adams
Tetrahedron ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 49 (27) ◽  
pp. 5961-5968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koshi Koseki ◽  
Takashi Ebata ◽  
Teruyuki Kadokura ◽  
Hiroshi Kawakami ◽  
Mikio Ono ◽  
...  

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (43) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
K. KOSEKI ◽  
T. EBATA ◽  
T. KADOKURA ◽  
H. KAWAKAMI ◽  
M. ONO ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
James W. Johnson ◽  
Robert D. Kriegel ◽  
John C. Wise

Abstract Insecticides were applied to mature 14 year old grape vines at the Trevor Nichols Research Complex near Fennville, MI at a rate of 50 gpa using a FMC 1029 airblast sprayer. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design of single 50-foot-long rows of vines replicated 4 times. Insecticides were applied, as indicated in the table, on the following dates: 4 May (BS), 25 May (1C), 9 Jun (Bloom), 22 Jun (3C), 3 Jul (4C), 17 Jul (5C), 29 Jul (6C), 12 Aug (7C), 25 Aug (8C) and 6 Sep (9C). Second generation grape berry moth application was timed for one wk after sustained catch in pheromone traps. Phytotoxicity damage was rated on the untreated control and the Danitol plots on 22 Jul. Twenty-five leaf samples were rated as clean or damaged. A leaf was rated as damaged if it had spots or blemishes that could not be attributed to disease or insect injury. All damaged leaves had ≤25% of their surface injured. Damage evaluations for grape berry moth, and Japanese beetle were performed on 27 Sep. Damage was assessed by sampling 25 fruit clusters from each replicate. Each cluster was rated for the presence or absence of injury from each of the three insect pests.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 4072-4076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey L. Horvath ◽  
Christopher G. Newton ◽  
Kimberley A. Roper ◽  
Jas S. Ward ◽  
Michael S. Sherburn

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Donaldson ◽  
Karen Krejcha ◽  
Andy McMillin

The autism community represents a broad spectrum of individuals, including those experiencing autism, their parents and/or caregivers, friends and family members, professionals serving these individuals, and other allies and advocates. Beliefs, experiences, and values across the community can be quite varied. As such, it is important for the professionals serving the autism community to be well-informed about current discussions occurring within the community related to neurodiversity, a strengths-based approach to partnering with autism community, identity-first language, and concepts such as presumed competence. Given the frequency with which speech-language pathologists (SLPs) serve the autism community, the aim of this article is to introduce and briefly discuss these topics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document