Nuclear Receptor−DNA Binding Specificity:  A COMBINE and Free−Wilson QSAR Analysis‖

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1780-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanja Tomic ◽  
Lennart Nilsson ◽  
Rebecca C. Wade
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Qsar Analysis ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity

scholarly journals Mutual Information Identifies Sequence Positions Conserved within the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Approach Reveals Functionally Important Regions for DNA Binding Specificity

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.09001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scooter Willis ◽  
Patrick Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Mutual Information ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Oligomeric State ◽  
Dimer Interface ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Superfamily ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
Flanking Region

Members of the nuclear receptor superfamily differentiate in terms of specificity for DNA recognition and binding, oligomeric state, and ligand binding. The wide range of specificities are impressive given the high degree of sequence conservation in the DNA binding domain (DBD) and moderate sequence conservation with high structural similarity within the ligand binding domains (LBDs). Determining sequence positions that are conserved within nuclear receptor subfamilies can provide important indicators into the structural dynamics that translate to oligomeric state of the active receptor, DNA binding specificity and ligand affinity and selectivity. Here we present a method to analyze sequence data from all nuclear receptors that facilitates detection of co-evolving pairs using Mutual Information (MI). Using this method we demonstrate that MI can reveal functionally important sequence positions within the superfamily and the approach identified three sequence positions that have conserved sequence patterns across all nuclear receptors and subfamilies. Interestingly, two of the sequence positions identified are located within the DBD CII and the third was within Helix c of the DBD. These sequences are located within the heterodimer interface of PPARγ (CII) and RXR α (Helix c) based on PDB:3DZU. Helix c of PPARγ, which is not involved in the DBD dimer interface, binds the minor groove in the 5’ flanking region in a consensus PPARγ response element (PPRE) and the corresponding RXR α (CII) is found in the 3’ flanking region of RXRE (3DZU). As these three sequence positions represent unique identifiers for all nuclear receptors and they are located within the dimer interface of PPARγ-RXRα DBD (3DZU) interfacing with the flanking regions of the NRRE, we conclude they are critical sequence positions perhaps dictating nuclear receptor (NR) DNA binding specificity.

scholarly journals DNA-binding specificity of GATA family transcription factors.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3999-4010 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Merika ◽  
S H Orkin
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
Mobility Shift Assay ◽  
Gata Family

GATA-binding proteins constitute a family of transcription factors that recognize a target site conforming to the consensus WGATAR (W = A or T and R = A or G). Here we have used the method of polymerase chain reaction-mediated random site selection to assess in an unbiased manner the DNA-binding specificity of GATA proteins. Contrary to our expectations, we show that GATA proteins bind a variety of motifs that deviate from the previously assigned consensus. Many of the nonconsensus sequences bind protein with high affinity, equivalent to that of conventional GATA motifs. By using the selected sequences as probes in the electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we demonstrate overlapping, but distinct, sequence preferences for GATA family members, specified by their respective DNA-binding domains. Furthermore, we provide additional evidence for interaction of amino and carboxy fingers of GATA-1 in defining its binding site. By performing cotransfection experiments, we also show that transactivation parallels DNA binding. A chimeric protein containing the finger domain of areA and the activation domains of GATA-1 is capable of activating transcription in mammalian cells through GATA motifs. Our findings suggest a mechanism by which GATA proteins might selectively regulate gene expression in cells in which they are coexpressed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document