ABSTRACTExtracytoplasmicfunction (ECF) σ factors are the largest and the most diverse group of alternative σ factors, but their mechanisms of transcription are poorly studied. This subfamily is considered to exhibit a rigid promoter structure and an absence of mixing and matching; both −35 and −10 elements are considered necessary for initiating transcription. This paradigm, however, is based on very limited data, which bias the analysis of diverse ECF σ subgroups. Here we investigate DNA and protein recognition motifs involved in ECF σ factor transcription by a computational analysis of canonical ECF subfamily members, much less studied ECF σ subgroups, and the group outliers, obtained from recently sequenced bacteriophages. The analysis identifies an extended −10 element in promoters for phage ECF σ factors; a comparison with bacterial σ factors points to a putative 6-amino-acid motif just C-terminal of domain σ2, which is responsible for the interaction with the identified extension of the −10 element. Interestingly, a similar protein motif is found C-terminal of domain σ2in canonical ECF σ factors, at a position where it is expected to interact with a conserved motif further upstream of the −10 element. Moreover, the phiEco32 ECF σ factor lacks a recognizable −35 element and σ4domain, which we identify in a homologous phage, 7-11, indicating that the extended −10 element can compensate for the lack of −35 element interactions. Overall, the results reveal greater flexibility in promoter recognition by ECF σ factors than previously recognized and raise the possibility that mixing and matching also apply to this group, a notion that remains to be biochemically tested.IMPORTANCEECF σ factors are the most numerous group of alternative σ factors but have been little studied. Their promoter recognition mechanisms are obscured by the large diversity within the ECF σ factor group and the limited similarity with the well-studied housekeeping σ factors. Here we extensively compare bacterial and bacteriophage ECF σ factors and their promoters in order to infer DNA and protein recognition motifs involved in transcription initiation. We predict a more flexible promoter structure than is recognized by the current paradigm, which assumes rigidness, and propose that ECF σ promoter elements may complement (mix and match with) each other's strengths. These results warrant the refocusing of research efforts from the well-studied housekeeping σ factors toward the physiologically highly important, but insufficiently understood, alternative σ factors.
Zinc fingers as protein recognition motifs: Structural basis for the GATA-1/Friend of GATA interaction