Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate Amendment of Vineyard Soils on the Behavior of Fungicides: 2. Mobility of Penconazole and Metalaxyl in Undisturbed Soil Cores

2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (20) ◽  
pp. 9643-9650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús M. Marín-Benito ◽  
M. Sonia Rodríguez-Cruz ◽  
M. Soledad Andrades ◽  
María J. Sánchez-Martín
Keyword(s):  
Soil Cores ◽  
Spent Mushroom Substrate ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Substrate Amendment ◽  
Vineyard Soils ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

Isoproturon movement and dissipation in undisturbed soil cores from a grassed buffer strip

Agronomie ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Benoit ◽  
Enrique Barriuso ◽  
Philippe Vidon ◽  
Benoit Réal
Keyword(s):  
Soil Cores ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Buffer Strip ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate Amendment of Vineyard Soils on the Behavior of Fungicides: 1. Adsorption−Desorption of Penconazole and Metalaxyl by Soils and Subsoils

2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (20) ◽  
pp. 9634-9642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús M. Marín-Benito ◽  
María J. Sánchez-Martín ◽  
M. Soledad Andrades ◽  
Margarita Pérez-Clavijo ◽  
M. Sonia Rodríguez-Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Spent Mushroom Substrate ◽  
Substrate Amendment ◽  
Vineyard Soils ◽  
Adsorption Desorption

Relationship Between Soil Properties and Nitrogen Mineralization in Undisturbed Soil Cores from California Agroecosystems

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Miller ◽  
Brenna J. Aegerter ◽  
Nicholas E. Clark ◽  
Michelle Leinfelder-Miles ◽  
Eugene M. Miyao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Nitrogen Mineralization ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

Three-Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores

1999 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1530-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Perret ◽  
S. O. Prasher ◽  
A. Kantzas ◽  
C. Langford
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

scholarly journals Estimating the van Genuchten retention curve parameters of undisturbed soil from a single upward infiltration measurement

Soil Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 682 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Moret-Fernández ◽  
C. Peña-Sancho ◽  
B. Latorre ◽  
Y. Pueyo ◽  
M. V. López
Keyword(s):  
Water Retention ◽  
Time Domain Reflectometry ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Water Retention Curve ◽  
Internal Diameter ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Retention Curve ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

Estimation of the soil–water retention curve, θ(h), on undisturbed soil samples is of paramount importance to characterise the hydraulic behaviour of soils. Although a method of determining parameters of the water retention curve (α, a scale parameter inversely proportional to mean pore diameter and n, a measure of pore size distribution) from saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), sorptivity (S) and the β parameter, using S and β calculated from the inverse analysis of upward infiltration (UI) has been satisfactorily applied to sieved soil samples, its applicability to undisturbed soils has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to show that the method can be applied to undisturbed soil cores representing a range of textures and structures. Undisturbed soil cores were collected using stainless steel cylinders (5cm internal diameter×5cm high) from structured soils located in two different places: (1) an agricultural loam soil under conventional, reduced and no tillage systems; and (2) a loam soil under grazed and ungrazed natural shrubland. The α and n values estimated for the different soils using the UI method were compared with those calculated using time domain reflectometry (TDR) pressure cells (PC) for pressure heads of –0.5, –1.5, –3, –5, –10 and –50kPa. To compare the two methods, α values measured with UI were calculated to the drying branch of θ(h). For each treatment, three replicates of UI and PC calculations were performed. The results showed that the 5-cm high cylinders used in all experiments provided accurate estimates of S and β. Overall, the α and n values estimated with UI were larger than those measured with PC. These differences could be attributed, in part, to limitations of the PC method. On average, the n values calculated from the optimised S and β data were 5% larger than those obtained with PC. A relationship with a slope close to 1 fitted the n values estimated using both methods (nPC=0.73 nUI+0.49; R2=0.78, P<0.05). The results show that the UI method is a promising technique to estimate the hydraulic properties of undisturbed soil samples.

Colloid and Phosphorus Leaching From Undisturbed Soil Cores Sampled Along a Natural Clay Gradient

Soil Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 176 (8) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Lindblad Vendelboe ◽  
Per Moldrup ◽  
Goswin Heckrath ◽  
Yan Jin ◽  
Lis Wollesen de Jonge
Keyword(s):  
Phosphorus Leaching ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Natural Clay ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores

Vadose Zone Biodegradation of Benzene Vapors in Repacked and Undisturbed Soil Cores

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas H. Kristensen ◽  
Chisato Hosoi ◽  
Kaj Henriksen ◽  
Per Loll ◽  
Per Moldrup
Keyword(s):  
Vadose Zone ◽  
Soil Cores ◽  
Undisturbed Soil ◽  
Undisturbed Soil Cores
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document