Study of Flue Gas Desulfurization Absorbent Prepared from Coal Fly Ash:  Effects of the Composition of the Absorbent on the Activity

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 2322-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Tsuchiai ◽  
Tomohiro Ishizuka ◽  
Hideki Nakamura ◽  
Tsutomu Ueno ◽  
Hideshi Hattori
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

Flue gas desulfurization gypsum and coal fly ash as basic components of prefabricated building materials

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 628-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Telesca ◽  
Milena Marroccoli ◽  
Daniela Calabrese ◽  
Gian Lorenzo Valenti ◽  
Fabio Montagnaro
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Building Materials ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Prefabricated Building

scholarly journals Selective sulfur removal from semi-dry flue gas desulfurization coal fly ash for concrete and carbon dioxide capture applications

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
Raghavendra Ragipani ◽  
Eleanor Escobar ◽  
Dale Prentice ◽  
Steven Bustillos ◽  
Dante Simonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Capture ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Sulfur Removal ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

Preparation of Active Absorbent for Dry-Type Flue Gas Desulfurization from Calcium Oxide, Coal Fly Ash, and Gypsum

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1390-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Ishizuka ◽  
Hiroaki Tsuchiai ◽  
Takeshi Murayama ◽  
Tsunehiro Tanaka ◽  
Hideshi Hattori
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Calcium Oxide ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

Analysis on Leaching Characteristics of Iron in Coal Fly Ash under Ammonia-Based Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) Conditions

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 5916-5919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Hong-lei Ding ◽  
Zu-liang Wu ◽  
Zhen Du ◽  
Zhong-yang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Leaching Characteristics

Immobilization of Heavy Metals by Solidification/Stabilization of Co-Disposed Flue Gas Desulfurization Brine and Coal Fly Ash

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 5042-5051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay E. Renew ◽  
Ching-Hua Huang ◽  
Susan E. Burns ◽  
Maya Carrasquillo ◽  
Weiling Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

Modeling and Simulation of Flue Gas Desulfurization Using CaO/CaSO4/Coal Fly Ash Sorbent

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kheng Chuan Christopher-Chia ◽  
Keat Teong Lee ◽  
Weeramundage James Noel Fernando ◽  
Subhash Bhatia ◽  
Abdul Rahman Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Modeling And Simulation ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization

scholarly journals REMOVAL OF SULFUR DIOXIDE FROM FLUE GAS USING ABSORBENT PREPARED BY WATER AND STEAM HYDRATION

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-60
Author(s):  
Lee Keat Teong ◽  
Abdul Rahman Mohamed ◽  
Subhash Bhatia
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Calcium Sulfate ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Bet Surface Area ◽  
Factor B ◽  
Drying Temperature ◽  
Factor C

Active absorbent for flue gas desulfurization was prepared from coal fly ash, calcium oxide (CaO) and calcium sulfate (CaSO4 ) by hydro-thermal process; steam and water hydration. The absorbents were examined and compared for its micro-structural properties. The experiments were conducted based on Design of Experiments (DOE) according to 24 factorial design. The effect of various absorbent preparation variables such as hydration period (Factor A), ratio of CaO to fly ash (Factor B), amount of calcium sulfate used (Factor C) and drying temperature (Factor D) towards the BET surface area of the absorbent were studied. The BET surface area of the absorbent was in the range of 12.9-169.3 m2/g. Fisher’s test showed that there is a strong influence of factor A, B and D towards the absorbent surface area, while its dependence on factor C is negligible. Comparison between absorbents prepared from water and steam hydration showed that the BET surface area of absorbents prepared from water hydration gives a higher surface area, but at a lower rate. The optimum BET surface area for the prepared absorbent 169.3 m 2 /g, was obtained at the following absorbent preparation variables using water hydration; hydration period of 24 hours, ratio of CaO to fly ash of 1:2, CaSO4 amount of 3 g and drying temperature of 200°C.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document