NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE: Report of E. S. Chapin, Paris Representative of the Textile Alliance, Inc., to the Dye Advisory Committee of the State Department, September 29, 1920

1920 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1130-1132
1962 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-523
Author(s):  
Leland M. Goodrich

At its fourth meeting in November, 1960, the Committee had recognized that Foreign Relations was “faced with a crisis of major proportions.” Taking note of “the fantastic expansion of materials in the archives of the State Department during the war and post-war years, an expansion which reflects the enlarged role of the United States in world affairs,”


1944 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-136
Author(s):  
Dexter Perkins
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Gleijeses

AbstractA comprehensive study of the available documents about the Bay of Pigs, including many that have been declassified within the last eighteen months, and extensive interviews with the protagonists in the CIA, the White House and the State Department lead me to conclude that the disastrous operation was launched not simply because Kennedy was poorly served by his young staff and was the captive of his campaign rhetoric, nor simply because of the hubris of the CIA. Rather, the Bay of Pigs was approved because the CIA and the White House assumed they were speaking the same language when, in fact, they were speaking in utterly different tongues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document