Preparation and Properties of Coated Nitrogen Fertilizer with Slow Release and Water Retention

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (25) ◽  
pp. 8610-8616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Liang ◽  
Mingzhu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Water Retention ◽  
Slow Release

scholarly journals Metabolism of Oxamide (Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer) in Rice Plant

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Shoji Sakai ◽  
Yutaka Takada ◽  
Ryoji Nakagawa ◽  
Yoshio Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Rice Plant ◽  
Slow Release

scholarly journals Kinetika Slow Release Pupuk Urea Berlapis Chitosan Termodifikasi

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
YC Danarto ◽  
Anggita Nugrahey ◽  
Sela Murni Noviani
Keyword(s):  
Water Retention ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Zero Order ◽  
Release Profile ◽  
Nitrogen Release ◽  
Diffusion Kinetic ◽  
Urea Fertilizer ◽  
First Order ◽  
Modified Chitosan ◽  
Urea Content

<p>During this time, the use of urea is not efficient, because about 40-70% of nitrogen in the fertilizer is not absorbed by plants. In order to increase the effectivity of nitrogen release in urea fertilizer, it needs to be coated with modified chitosan as slow releasing agent to form a hydrogel material by forming a cross linking with glutaraldehyde cross-linker.The aims of this research is to study the mechanism and the appropriate kinetic model of nitrogen release in slow releasing fertilizer of modified chitosan. This research was conducted by analyzing the ability of bio-hydrogel by calculating the percentage of swelling ratio and water retention of hydrogel and the nitrogen release in slow releasing fertilizer both in the soil and water. The experiments were conducted by varying the amount of urea used which  30 gram, 40 gram, 50 gram, 60 gram and 70 gram of urea fertilizer. The The release profile is then plotted on several models of diffusion kinetic such as zero order, first order, higuchi and korsmeyer peppas. The appropriate model of diffusion kinetic is chosen by the largest correction factor (R2).The results showed that nitrogen release of the slow releasing fertilizer in the soil with 50% urea content  and  the  water  followed  korsmeyer  peppas  model  with  fickian  mechanism. Nitrogen release in the soil with urea content of 30%, 40%, 60%, and 70% followed the korsmeyer peppas model with nonfickian mechanism.</p>

Application of Slow-Release Fertilizer with the Function of Water-Absorption and Water-Retention in Position Engineering Camouflage

2011 ◽  
Vol 117-119 ◽  
pp. 1100-1102
Author(s):  
Shao Hong Li ◽  
Yue Guo Shen ◽  
Zhong Feng Shi
Keyword(s):  
Water Absorption ◽  
Water Retention ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
Rock Slopes ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizer ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Earth Slopes

The construction of position engineering causes a lot of naked earth slopes and rock slopes. Because the earth and rock lack of water absorption and water retention, traditional vegetation camouflage can not make it. The slow-release fertilizer with the function of water-absorption and water-retention make up it and which will be applied widely in vegetation camouflage of position engineering.

scholarly journals Effect of slow release fertilizers on container-grown woody plants

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Šrámek ◽  
M. Dubský
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Woody Plants ◽  
Slow Release ◽  
First Year ◽  
Nutrient Source ◽  
Thuja Occidentalis ◽  
Slow Release Fertilizers ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Soluble Fertilizer ◽  
Pyracantha Coccinea

Slow-Release Fertilizers (SRF) Silvamix Forte and Silvagen were tested in two-year experiments with container-grown woody plants (<i>Pyracantha coccinea</i>, <i>Thuja occidentalis</i>). Several fertilizing systems were compared: preplant application of SRF into substrate as the sole nutrient source for a two-year period, preplant application of SRF and soluble fertilizer (PG Mix), and preplant application of SRF and soluble fertilizer together with additional fertilizing by solution of nitrogen fertilizer during both growing periods. A system with controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) Osmocote 5&minus;6 was chosen as a control variant; it was incorporated into substrate before planting in the first year and top-dressed in the second year. CRF Plantacote 6M (mixed into substrate before planting and top-dressed in the second year) and Osmocote 16&minus;18 applied only before planting were tested, too. The experiments showed that SRF Silvamix Forte and Silvagen give results comparable with CFR provided that they were incorporated together with soluble ferti-lizer dose and plants were fertilized by solution of nitrogen fertilizer during both growing periods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document