Flue-Gas Desulfurization in Circulating Fluidized Beds:  An Empirical Model from an Experimental Pilot-Plant Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (23) ◽  
pp. 5640-5648 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ollero ◽  
F. J. Gutiérrez Ortiz ◽  
A. Cabanillas ◽  
J. Otero
2011 ◽  
Vol 233-235 ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Wen Hao ◽  
Chun Yuan Ma ◽  
Qiang Zhao

Circulating Fluidization Bed (CFB) for Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) is widely used. But its desulfurization efficiency is lower than Wet FGD. Its investment is not much lower than Wet FGD. Flow field of CFB for FGD is hard to be uniform. Swirl Composite Fluidization Mode (SCFM) was brought forward compared to Venturi Fluidization Mode (VFM). Experiment and simulation under cold condition was proceeded. From the test, flow field along axis and in cross-sections for SCFM are uniform. Turbulent velocity fluctuation is violent. And particles concentration is high. SCFM has better flow effect than VFM. Uniformity increases with higher superficial velocity and more tangential swirl devices. Recommended tangential swirl devices number is between 3-6. SCFM technology has good foreground.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (20) ◽  
pp. 7114-7119 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Vidal B. ◽  
P. Ollero ◽  
F. J. Gutiérrez Ortiz ◽  
A. Villanueva

Author(s):  
Sathish Kumar Guntuka ◽  
Rama Rao Vemula ◽  
Ricky Nilam ◽  
Faruque Hassan ◽  
Paul Sharratt ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (17) ◽  
pp. 6093-6093 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Gutiérrez Ortiz ◽  
F. Vidal ◽  
P. Ollero ◽  
L. Salvador ◽  
V. Cortés ◽  
...  

JAPCA ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 796-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jozewicz ◽  
Claus Jorgensen ◽  
John C.S. Chang ◽  
Charles B. Sedman ◽  
Theodore G. Brna

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1919-1928
Author(s):  
Lawrence Koech ◽  
Hilary Rutto ◽  
Ray Everson ◽  
Hein Neomagus

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (21) ◽  
pp. 8263-8272 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Villanueva Perales ◽  
P. Ollero ◽  
F. J. Gutiérrez Ortiz ◽  
F. Vidal B.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document