Fluidization in two-dimensional beds with a jet. 2. Hydrodynamic modeling

1983 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitri Gidaspow ◽  
Bozorg Ettehadieh
Keyword(s):  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Two Dimensional

Two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of circulation in Great South Bay and New York Bight

2014 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sankaranarayanan ◽  
Deborah French-McCay ◽  
Jill J. Rowe
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Great South Bay ◽  
New York Bight ◽  
York Bight

Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology

1995 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Leclerc ◽  
André Boudreault ◽  
Toss A. Bechara ◽  
Geneviève Corfa
Keyword(s):  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Instream Flow

Two-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic modeling of carbon fiber Z-pinch experiments

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 4309-4317 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Chittenden ◽  
R. Aliaga Rossel ◽  
S. V. Lebedev ◽  
I. H. Mitchell ◽  
M. Tatarakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Z Pinch

Hydrodynamic Modeling of Two-Dimensional Watershed Flow

1973 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. 2023-2040
Author(s):  
Ven Te Chow ◽  
Arie Ben-Zvi
Keyword(s):  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Two Dimensional

Tripping over spatial scales: a comment on Guay et al. (2000)

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 2105-2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G Williams
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Scale ◽  
Hydrodynamic Model ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Hydrodynamic Modeling ◽  
Velocity Fields ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Biological Models ◽  
Habitat Models

Guay et al. (2000.Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci.57:2065–2075) report a test of numerical habitat models (NHMs) that combine two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of the depth and velocity fields of a stream reach with simple biological models. The hydrodynamic model was tested with field data from randomly chosen points in the stream, and the overall models were tested with observations of fish in a "verification" section of the stream. This is a proper procedure, but the execution and interpretation of the test seem flawed, largely by a misunderstanding of the spatial scales appropriate. The NHMs used by Guay et al. make predictions for patches or "tiles" at a scale of 1–25 m2; the hydrodynamic component of the NHMs needs to be tested at the same spatial scale.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document