scholarly journals Matrix Complications in the Determination of Radium Levels in Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Water from Marcellus Shale

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Nelson ◽  
Dustin May ◽  
Andrew W. Knight ◽  
Eric S. Eitrheim ◽  
Marinea Mehrhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Marcellus Shale ◽  
Flowback Water

A Laboratory Study of the Impact of Reinjecting Flowback Fluids on Formation Damage in the Marcellus Shale

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (02) ◽  
pp. 788-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lifu Zhang ◽  
Michael Tice ◽  
Berna Hascakir
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Produced Water ◽  
Marcellus Shale ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Formation Damage ◽  
Rock Interaction ◽  
Flowback Water ◽  
Rock Samples ◽  
Water Rock Interaction

Summary Reuse of flowback water in hydraulic fracturing is usually used by industry to reduce consumption, transportation, and disposal cost of water. However, because of complex interactions between injected water and reservoir rocks, induced fractures may be blocked by impurities carried by flowback and mineral precipitation by water/rock interactions, which causes formation damage. Therefore, knowledge of flowback water/rock interactions is important to understand the changes within the formation and effects on hydraulic fracturing performance. This study focuses on investigating flowback water/rock interactions during hydraulic fracturing in Marcellus Shale. Simple deionized water (DI)/rock interactions and complicated flowback water/rock interactions were studied under static and dynamic conditions. In static experiments, crushed reservoir rock samples were exposed to water for 3 weeks at room condition. In the dynamic experiment, continuous water flow interacted with rock samples through the coreflooding experimental system for 3 hours at reservoir condition. Before and after experiments, rock samples were characterized to determine the change on the rock surfaces. Water samples were analyzed to estimate the particle precipitation tendency and potential to modify flow pathway. Surface elemental concentrations, mineralogy, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of rock samples were characterized. Ion contents, particle size, total dissolved solids (TDS), and zeta-potential in the water samples were analyzed. After flowback water/rock interaction, the surface of the rock sample shows changes in the compositions and more particle attachment. In produced water, Na, Sr, and Cl concentrations are extremely high because of flowback water contamination. Water parameters show that produced water has the highest precipitation tendency relative to all water samples. Therefore, if flowback water without any treatment is reused in hydraulic fracturing, formation damage is more likely to occur from blockage of pores. Flowback water management is becoming very important due to volumes produced in every hydraulic fracturing operation. Deep well injection is no longer a favorable option because it results in disposal of high volumes of water that cannot be used for other purposes. A second option is the reuse of waste water for fracturing purposes, which reduces freshwater use significantly. However, the impurities present in flowback water may deteriorate the fracturing job and reduce or block the hydraulic fracturing apertures. This study shows that a simple filtration process applied to the flowback water allows for reinjection of the flowback water without further complication to the water/rock interaction, and does not cause significant formation damage in the fractures.

The Application of Hydraulic Fracturing in Storage Projects of Liquefied Petroleum Gas

2006 ◽  
Vol 306-308 ◽  
pp. 1509-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Feng ◽  
Qian Sheng ◽  
Chao Wen Luo ◽  
Jing Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Stress Measurement ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Test System ◽  
Petroleum Engineering ◽  
Liquefied Petroleum Gas

It is very important to study the pristine stress field in Civil, Mining, Petroleum engineering as well as in Geology, Geophysics, and Seismology. There are various methods of determination of in-situ stress in rock mass. However, hydraulic fracturing techniques is the most convenient method to determine and interpret the test results. Based on an hydraulic fracturing stress measurement campaign at an underground liquefied petroleum gas storage project which locates in ZhuHai, China, this paper briefly describes the various uses of stress measurement, details of hydraulic fracturing test system, test procedure adopted and the concept of hydraulic fracturing in arriving at the in-situ stresses of the rock mass.

Experience in Optimizing the Location and Parameters of Multistage Hydraulic Fractures for a Multilateral Well Based on Reservoir Simulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vil Syrtlanov ◽  
Yury Golovatskiy ◽  
Konstantin Chistikov ◽  
Dmitriy Bormashov
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Optimal Placement ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Modeling Methods ◽  
Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Determination Of Parameters

Abstract This work presents the approaches used for the optimal placement and determination of parameters of hydraulic fractures in horizontal and multilateral wells in a low-permeability reservoir using various methods, including 3D modeling. The results of the production rate of a multilateral dualwellbore well are analyzed after the actual hydraulic fracturing performed on the basis of calculations. The advantages and disadvantages of modeling methods are evaluated, recommendations are given to improve the reliability of calculations for models with hydraulic fracturing (HF)/ multistage hydraulic fracturing (MHF).

Determination of the Near-Wellbore Pressure Drop for Dual Casing in Hydraulic Fracturing and Refracturing Applications

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joern Loehken ◽  
Davood Yosefnejad ◽  
Liam McNelis ◽  
Bernd Fricke
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
Cement Layer ◽  
Natural Rock ◽  
Wellbore Pressure ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Coefficient Of Discharge

Abstract Due to the increases in completion costs demand for production improvements, fracturing through double casing in upper reservoirs for mature wells and refracturing early stimulated wells to change the completion design, has become more and more popular. One of the most common technologies used to re-stimulate previously fracked wells, is to run a second, smaller casing or tubular inside of the existing and already perforated pipes of the completed well. The new inner and old outer casing are isolated from each other by a cement layer, which prevents any hydraulic communication between the pre-existing and new perforations, as well as between adjacent new perforations. For these smaller inner casing diameters, specially tailored and designed re-fracturing perforation systems are deployed, which can shoot casing entrance holes of very similar size through both casings, nearly independent of the phasing and still capable of creating tunnels reaching beyond the cement layer into the natural rock formation. Although discussing on the API RP-19B section VII test format has recently been initiated and many companies have started to test multiple casing scenarios and charge performance, not much is known about the complex flow through two radially aligned holes in dual casings. In the paper we will look in detail at the parameters which influence the flow, especially the Coefficient of Discharge of such a dual casing setup. We will evaluate how much the near wellbore pressure drop is affected by the hole's sizes in the first and second casing, respectively the difference between them and investigate how the cement layer is influenced by turbulences, which might build up in the annulus. The results will enhance the design and provide a better understanding of fracturing or refracturing through double casings for hydraulic fracturing specialists and both operation and services companies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document