Organic contaminants in groundwater near an underground coal gasification site in northeastern Wyoming

1982 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 582-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Stuermer ◽  
Douglas J. Ng ◽  
Clarence J. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification

The Effectiveness of Reactive Materials for Contaminant Removal in the Process of Coal Conversion

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-505
Author(s):  
Jacek Grabowski ◽  
Aleksandra Tokarz
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Limit Values ◽  
Reactive Material ◽  
Coal Conversion ◽  
Reactive Materials ◽  
Processing Water

ABSTRACT The technology of permeable reactive barriers (PRB) is one of the most frequently developed methods for protecting soil and water from pollution. These barriers are zones filled with reactive material in which contaminants are immobilized and/or their concentration is reduced to the limit values during the flow of contaminated groundwater. This article presents a study on the efficiency of the removal of contaminants from the post-processing water from the underground coal gasification (UCG) process. The tests were carried out in a laboratory using a flow-through reactor design. The post-processing water came from a UCG experiment carried out in the Barbara mine, Mikołów, Poland. Activated coal, zeolite, and nano-iron were used as the reactive materials in the experiment. The obtained results were compared to tests carried out with reference water (artificial) with strictly defined characteristics. Research has shown that activated carbon is the most effective material used in the reaction zone for removing organic contaminants from groundwater generated during the coal conversion process. A new feature is the use of PRB in a georeactor zone during the UCG process to limit the potential risk of contamination spreading in the case of uncontrolled and unpredictable operation, in emergency situations related to gas leaks into the environment, during underground fires, and for water polluted by high-toxicity substances.

Analysis of the organic contaminants in the condensate produced in the in situ underground coal gasification process

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 644-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Smoliński ◽  
Krzysztof Stańczyk ◽  
Krzysztof Kapusta ◽  
Natalia Howaniec
Keyword(s):  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Ethyl Benzene ◽  
Hard Coal ◽  
Stable Operation ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Operational Conditions ◽  
Process Stage ◽  
Post Process ◽  
Benzene Toluene

Addressing the environmental risks related to contamination of groundwater with the phenolics, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene (BTEX) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which might be potentially released from the underground coal gasification (UCG) under adverse hydrogeological and/or operational conditions, is crucial in terms of wider implementation of the process. The aim of this study was to determine the main organic pollutants present in the process condensate generated during the UCG trial performed on hard coal seam in the Experimental Mine ‘Barbara’, Poland; 8,933 L of condensate was produced in 813 h of experiment duration (including 456 h of the post-process stage) with average phenolics, BTEX and PAH concentrations of 576,000, 42.3 and 1,400.5 μg/L, respectively. The Hierarchical Clustering Analysis was used to explore the differences and similarities between the samples. The sample collected during the first 48 h of the process duration was characterized by the lowest phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene and pyrene contents, high xylene content and the highest concentrations of phenolics, benzene, toluene and ethyl benzene. The samples collected during the stable operation of the UCG process were characterized by higher concentrations of naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, while in the samples acquired in the post-process stage the lowest concentrations of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, acenaphthene and fluorene were observed.

Cold Flow Simulation in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Cavities

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Chatterjee ◽  
◽  
Satish Gupta ◽  
Chebolu Aravind ◽  
Rakesh Roshan
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Cold Flow

scholarly journals Changes in properties of tar obtained during underground coal gasification process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Wiatowski ◽  
Roksana Muzyka ◽  
Krzysztof Kapusta ◽  
Maciej Chrubasik
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Coal Tar ◽  
Liquid Product ◽  
Coke Oven ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Gasification Process ◽  
Dominant Component ◽  
Process Gas ◽  
High Volatility ◽  
Product Separator

AbstractIn this study, the composition of tars collected during a six-day underground coal gasification (UCG) test at the experimental mine ‘Barbara’ in Poland in 2013 was examined. During the test, tar samples were taken every day from the liquid product separator and analysed by the methods used for testing properties of typical coke oven (coal) tar. The obtained results were compared with each other and with the data for coal tar. As gasification progressed, a decreasing trend in the water content and an increasing trend in the ash content were observed. The tars tested were characterized by large changes in the residue after coking and content of parts insoluble in toluene and by smaller fluctuations in the content of parts insoluble in quinoline. All tested samples were characterized by very high distillation losses, while for samples starting from the third day of gasification, a clear decrease in losses was visible. A chromatographic analysis showed that there were no major differences in composition between the tested tars and that none of the tar had a dominant component such as naphthalene in coal tar. The content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in UCG tars is several times lower than that in coal tar. No light monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes—BTEX) were found in the analysed tars, which results from the fact that these compounds, due to their high volatility, did not separate from the process gas in the liquid product separator.

Control oriented modeling and optimization of one dimensional packed bed model of underground coal gasification

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Arshad Uppal ◽  
Aamer Iqbal Bhatti ◽  
Erum Aamir ◽  
Raza Samar ◽  
Shahid Ahmed Khan
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Packed Bed ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Modeling And Optimization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document