Direct Observation of the Effect of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) on the Gas Hydrate Formation Process in a Static Mixer

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Tajima ◽  
Fumio Kiyono ◽  
Akihiro Yamasaki
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1212-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Tajima ◽  
Yosuke Nakajima ◽  
Junichiro Otomo ◽  
Hidetoshi Nagamoto ◽  
Akihiro Yamasaki ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (17) ◽  
pp. 1425-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongli Zhao ◽  
Kaihua Guo ◽  
Xiaocong Liu ◽  
Shuanshi Fan ◽  
Bifen Shu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (22) ◽  
pp. 11614-11619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Sen Li ◽  
Zhi-Ming Xia ◽  
Zhao-Yang Chen ◽  
Ke-Feng Yan ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 524-527 ◽  
pp. 1734-1738
Author(s):  
Shu Li Wang ◽  
Ming Jiao Wei ◽  
En Tian Li ◽  
Shi Dong Zhou

An experiment on effects of composite promoting agents composed of surfactants and liquid hydrocarbons on hydrate formation was conducted and hydrate formation temperature, pressure, induction time and rate with different composite promoting agent portfolios were measured. Surfactants used were sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate(SDBS) and 2-octyl sodium dodecyl sulfate(GC20S), and liquid hydrocarbon additives utilized were ring silane e (CP) and methyl cyclohexane (MCH). It appeared that all these combinations of composite promoting agents could promote hydrate formation. Type II and H hydrate formation conditions with composite promoting agents CP+GC20S and MCH+GC20S respectively were the mildest and the induction time was the shortest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 881-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuqi Fang ◽  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Jingyi Zhang ◽  
Chun Chang ◽  
Pan Li ◽  
...  

Energy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 2729-2733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Ju Lee ◽  
Ju Dong Lee ◽  
Praveen Linga ◽  
Peter Englezos ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document