Prediction of Solvation Free Energies of Small Organic Molecules:  Additive-Constitutive Models Based on Molecular Fingerprints and Atomic Constants

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vellarkad N. Viswanadhan ◽  
Arup K. Ghose ◽  
U. Chandra Singh ◽  
John J. Wendoloski
Keyword(s):  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Constitutive Models ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Molecular Fingerprints ◽  
Small Organic Molecules ◽  
Solvation Free Energies

Classification study of solvation free energies of organic molecules using machine learning techniques

RSC Advances ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (106) ◽  
pp. 61624-61630 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Hari Narayana Moorthy ◽  
Silvia A. Martins ◽  
Sergio F. Sousa ◽  
Maria J. Ramos ◽  
Pedro A. Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Classification Models ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Solvation Free Energies

Classification models to predict the solvation free energies of organic molecules were developed using decision tree, random forest and support vector machine approaches and with MACCS fingerprints, MOE and PaDEL descriptors.

scholarly journals Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos ◽  
Daisy Y. Kyu ◽  
Hannes H. Loeffler ◽  
John D. Chodera ◽  
Michael R. Shirts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Molecular Simulations ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Energy Functions ◽  
Neutral Compounds ◽  
Aqueous Solvation ◽  
Solvation Free Energies

AbstractSolvation free energies can now be calculated precisely from molecular simulations, providing a valuable test of the energy functions underlying these simulations. Here, we briefly review “alchemical” approaches for calculating the solvation free energies of small, neutral organic molecules from molecular simulations, and illustrate by applying them to calculate aqueous solvation free energies (hydration free energies). These approaches use a non-physical pathway to compute free energy differences from a simulation or set of simulations and appear to be a particularly robust and general-purpose approach for this task. We also present an update (version 0.5) to our FreeSolv database of experimental and calculated hydration free energies of neutral compounds and provide input files in formats for several simulation packages. This revision to FreeSolv provides calculated values generated with a single protocol and software version, rather than the heterogeneous protocols used in the prior version of the database. We also further update the database to provide calculated enthalpies and entropies of hydration and some experimental enthalpies and entropies, as well as electrostatic and nonpolar components of solvation free energies.

scholarly journals Predicting the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Molecules with Machine Learning Models Trained on Biologically Meaningful Descriptors

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 790
Author(s):  
Anke Wilm ◽  
Marina Garcia de Lomana ◽  
Conrad Stork ◽  
Neann Mathai ◽  
Steffen Hirte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Skin Sensitization ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Molecular Fingerprints ◽  
Small Organic Molecules ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Machine Learning Models

In recent years, a number of machine learning models for the prediction of the skin sensitization potential of small organic molecules have been reported and become available. These models generally perform well within their applicability domains but, as a result of the use of molecular fingerprints and other non-intuitive descriptors, the interpretability of the existing models is limited. The aim of this work is to develop a strategy to replace the non-intuitive features by predicted outcomes of bioassays. We show that such replacement is indeed possible and that as few as ten interpretable, predicted bioactivities are sufficient to reach competitive performance. On a holdout data set of 257 compounds, the best model (“Skin Doctor CP:Bio”) obtained an efficiency of 0.82 and an MCC of 0.52 (at the significance level of 0.20). Skin Doctor CP:Bio is available free of charge for academic research. The modeling strategies explored in this work are easily transferable and could be adopted for the development of more interpretable machine learning models for the prediction of the bioactivity and toxicity of small organic compounds.

Hydration Free Energies of Organic Molecules in the FreeSolv Database Calculated with Polarized Atom In Molecules Atomic Charges and the GAFF Force Field.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Riquelme ◽  
Alejandro Lara ◽  
David L. Mobley ◽  
Toon Vestraelen ◽  
Adelio R Matamala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Force Field ◽  
Functional Groups ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Atomic Charges ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Molecular Systems ◽  
Solvent Model

<div>Computer simulations of bio-molecular systems often use force fields, which are combinations of simple empirical atom-based functions to describe the molecular interactions. Even though polarizable force fields give a more detailed description of intermolecular interactions, nonpolarizable force fields, developed several decades ago, are often still preferred because of their reduced computation cost. Electrostatic interactions play a major role in bio-molecular systems and are therein described by atomic point charges.</div><div>In this work, we address the performance of different atomic charges to reproduce experimental hydration free energies in the FreeSolv database in combination with the GAFF force field. Atomic charges were calculated by two atoms-in-molecules approaches, Hirshfeld-I and Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS). To account for polarization effects, the charges were derived from the solute's electron density computed with an implicit solvent model and the energy required to polarize the solute was added to the free energy cycle. The calculated hydration free energies were analyzed with an error model, revealing systematic errors associated with specific functional groups or chemical elements. The best agreement with the experimental data is observed for the MBIS atomic charge method, including the solvent polarization, with a root mean square error of 2.0 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for the 613 organic molecules studied. The largest deviation was observed for phosphor-containing molecules and the molecules with amide, ester and amine functional groups.</div>

QUBEKit: Automating the Derivation of Force Field Parameters from Quantum Mechanics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Force Field ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Liquid Density ◽  
Small Organic Molecules ◽  
Automated Generation ◽  
Energy Of Hydration ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Force Field Parameters

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>

QUBEKit: Automating the Derivation of Force Field Parameters from Quantum Mechanics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Force Field ◽  
Organic Molecules ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Liquid Density ◽  
Small Organic Molecules ◽  
Automated Generation ◽  
Energy Of Hydration ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Force Field Parameters

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document