Slit scanning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells: quantification of asymmetric cell division and cell cycle progression in asynchronous culture

1990 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 504-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Block ◽  
Philip D. Eitzman ◽  
Jeffrey D. Wangensteen ◽  
Friedrich Srienc
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Slit Scanning

scholarly journals The FACT complex and cell cycle progression are essential to maintain asymmetric transcription factor partitioning during cell division

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Herrero ◽  
Sonia Stinus ◽  
Eleanor Bellows ◽  
Peter H Thorpe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Reverse Genetic Screen

AbstractThe polarized partitioning of proteins in cells underlies asymmetric cell division, which is an important driver of development and cellular diversity. Like most cells, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically to give two distinct daughter cells. This asymmetry mimics that seen in metazoans and the key regulatory proteins are conserved from yeast to human. A well-known example of an asymmetric protein is the transcription factor Ace2, which localizes specifically to the daughter nucleus, where it drives a daughter-specific transcriptional network. We performed a reverse genetic screen to look for regulators of asymmetry based on the Ace2 localization phenotype. We screened a collection of essential genes in order to analyze the effect of core cellular processes in asymmetric cell division. This identified a large number of mutations that are known to affect progression through the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry. To test this model we blocked cells from progressing through mitosis and found that prolonged cell cycle arrest is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry after release. We also demonstrate that members of the evolutionary conserved FACT chromatin-remodeling complex are required for both asymmetric and cell cycle-regulated localization of Ace2.

scholarly journals Coordinating cell polarity and cell cycle progression: what can we learn from flies and worms?

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 130083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Noatynska ◽  
Nicolas Tavernier ◽  
Monica Gotta ◽  
Lionel Pintard
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Cycle Progression

Spatio-temporal coordination of events during cell division is crucial for animal development. In recent years, emerging data have strengthened the notion that tight coupling of cell cycle progression and cell polarity in dividing cells is crucial for asymmetric cell division and ultimately for metazoan development. Although it is acknowledged that such coupling exists, the molecular mechanisms linking the cell cycle and cell polarity machineries are still under investigation. Key cell cycle regulators control cell polarity, and thus influence cell fate determination and/or differentiation, whereas some factors involved in cell polarity regulate cell cycle timing and proliferation potential. The scope of this review is to discuss the data linking cell polarity and cell cycle progression, and the importance of such coupling for asymmetric cell division. Because studies in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have started to reveal the molecular mechanisms of this coordination, we will concentrate on these two systems. We review examples of molecular mechanisms suggesting a coupling between cell polarity and cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Asymmetric Transcription Factor Partitioning During Yeast Cell Division Requires the FACT Chromatin Remodeler and Cell Cycle Progression

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. 701-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Herrero ◽  
Sonia Stinus ◽  
Eleanor Bellows ◽  
Lisa K. Berry ◽  
Henry Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Delay ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Ram Network

The polarized partitioning of proteins in cells underlies asymmetric cell division, which is an important driver of development and cellular diversity. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically, like many other cells, to generate two distinct progeny cells. A well-known example of an asymmetric protein is the transcription factor Ace2, which localizes specifically to the daughter nucleus, where it drives a daughter-specific transcriptional network. We screened a collection of essential genes to analyze the effects of core cellular processes in asymmetric cell division based on Ace2 localization. This screen identified mutations that affect progression through the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry. To test this model, we blocked cells from progressing through mitosis and found that prolonged metaphase delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry after release, and that Ace2 asymmetry is restored after cytokinesis. We also demonstrate that members of the evolutionarily conserved facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) chromatin-reorganizing complex are required for both asymmetric and cell cycle-regulated localization of Ace2, and for localization of the RAM network components.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Analysis of Cell Cycle and Replication of Mouse Macrophages afterIn VivoandIn VitroCryptococcus neoformans Infection Using Laser Scanning Cytometry

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Coelho ◽  
Lydia Tesfa ◽  
Jinghang Zhang ◽  
Johanna Rivera ◽  
Teresa Gonçalves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cytotoxic Effect ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Laser Scanning Cytometry

ABSTRACTWe investigated the outcome of the interaction ofCryptococcus neoformanswith murine macrophages using laser scanning cytometry (LSC). Previous results in our lab had shown that phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression. LSC allowed us to simultaneously measure the phagocytic index, macrophage DNA content, and 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation such that it was possible to study host cell division as a function of phagocytosis. LSC proved to be a robust, reliable, and high-throughput method for quantifying phagocytosis. Phagocytosis ofC. neoformanspromoted cell cycle progression, but infected macrophages were significantly less likely to complete mitosis. Hence, we report a new cytotoxic effect associated with intracellularC. neoformansresidence that manifested itself in impaired cell cycle completion as a consequence of a block in the G2/M stage of the mitotic cell cycle. Cell cycle arrest was not due to increased cell membrane permeability or DNA damage. We investigated alveolar macrophage replicationin vivoand demonstrated that these cells are capable of low levels of cell division in the presence or absence ofC. neoformansinfection. In summary, we simultaneously studied phagocytosis, the cell cycle state of the host cell and pathogen-mediated cytotoxicity, and our results demonstrate a new cytotoxic effect ofC. neoformansinfection on murine macrophages: fungus-induced cell cycle arrest. Finally, we provide evidence for alveolar macrophage proliferationin vivo.

scholarly journals Developmental HCN channelopathy results in decreased neural progenitor proliferation and microcephaly in mice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Katharina Schlusche ◽  
Sabine Ulrike Vay ◽  
Niklas Kleinenkuhnen ◽  
Steffi Sandke ◽  
Rafael Campos-Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Membrane Potential ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cortical Development ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Hcn Channel ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Channel Function ◽  
Stem And Progenitor Cells

ABSTRACTThe development of the cerebral cortex relies on the controlled division of neural stem and progenitor cells. The requirement for precise spatiotemporal control of proliferation and cell fate places a high demand on the cell division machinery, and defective cell division can cause microcephaly and other brain malformations. Cell-extrinsic and intrinsic factors govern the capacity of cortical progenitors to produce large numbers of neurons and glia within a short developmental time window. In particular, ion channels shape the intrinsic biophysical properties of precursor cells and neurons and control their membrane potential throughout the cell cycle. We found that hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN)-channel subunits are expressed in mouse, rat, and human neural progenitors. Loss of HCN-channel function in rat neural stem cells impaired their proliferation by affecting the cell-cycle progression, causing G1 accumulation and dysregulation of genes associated with human microcephaly. Transgene-mediated, dominant-negative loss of HCN-channel function in the embryonic mouse telencephalon resulted in pronounced microcephaly. Together, our findings suggest a novel role for HCN-channel subunits as a part of a general mechanism influencing cortical development in mammals.Significance StatementImpaired cell cycle regulation of neural stem and progenitor cells can affect cortical development and cause microcephaly. During cell cycle progression, the cellular membrane potential changes through the activity of ion channels and tends to be more depolarized in proliferating cells. HCN channels, which mediate a depolarizing current in neurons and cardiac cells, are linked to neurodevelopmental diseases, also contribute to the control of cell-cycle progression and proliferation of neuronal precursor cells. In this study, HCN-channel deficiency during embryonic and fetal brain development resulted in marked microcephaly of mice designed to be deficient in HCN-channel function in dorsal forebrain progenitors. The findings suggest that HCN-channel subunits are part of a general mechanism influencing cortical development in mammals.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell cycle drivers by Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1637-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Min Jang ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Bhushan L. Thakur ◽  
Meriam K. Bahta ◽  
Mirit I. Aladjem
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
F Box Protein

Abstract The last decade has revealed new roles for Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) in a myriad of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression. In addition to CRL1, also named SCF (SKP1-Cullin 1-F box protein), which has been known for decades as an important factor in the regulation of the cell cycle, it is now evident that all eight CRL family members are involved in the intricate cellular pathways driving cell cycle progression. In this review, we summarize the structure of CRLs and their functions in driving the cell cycle. We focus on how CRLs target key proteins for degradation or otherwise alter their functions to control the progression over the various cell cycle phases leading to cell division. We also summarize how CRLs and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ligase complex closely cooperate to govern efficient cell cycle progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document