Nuclear and Chemical Dating Techniques

1982 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Dating

Limitations of chemical dating of monazite

2009 ◽  
Vol 266 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 218-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Spear ◽  
Joseph M. Pyle ◽  
Daniele Cherniak
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Dating

scholarly journals DESENVOLVIMENTO DO MÉTODO DE DATAÇÃO QUÍMICA U-Th-Pb DE MONAZITA POR MICROSSONDA ELETRÔNICA NA UFMG

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre de Oliveira Chaves ◽  
Elizabeth Kerpe de Oliveira ◽  
Luiz Rodrigues Armoa Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microprobe ◽  
Chemical Data ◽  
Common Lead ◽  
Icp Ms ◽  
Dating Method ◽  
Physics Department ◽  
Chemical Dating

O método de datação química U-Th-Pb (não-isotópica) de monazita por microssonda eletrônica vem sendo desenvolvido há pelomenos 20 anos e já tem o reconhecimento da comunidade geológica por apresentar resultados que se equivalem à geocronologia isotópicaU-Pb. Este mineral contém quantidades negligenciáveis de chumbo comum, guardando apenas Pb radiogênico proveniente do Th e U destemineral. O desenvolvimento deste método no Laboratório de Microanálises do Departamento de Física da Universidade Federal de MinasGerais mostra que os dados químicos de U, Th e Pb de cristais de monazita fornecidos por sua microssonda eletrônica produzem idadesnão-isotópicas para eles que se equiparam às idades isotópicas U-Pb produzidas pela técnica LA-ICP-MS. Grãos de monazita de placersmarinhos de Buena (RJ) isotopicamente datados pelo método U-Pb com idades entre 530 e 580 Ma foram quimicamente datadas na UFMGentre 505 e 580 Ma. Estes resultados são consideravelmente compatíveis e colocam o referido laboratório a disposição da comunidadegeocientífica para obtenção de idades de cristais de monazita.Palavras-Chave: MONAZITA, DATAÇÃO QUÍMICA, MICROSSONDA ELETRÔNICA, UFMG ABSTRACTDEVELOPMENT OF THE MONAZITE U-Th-Pb CHEMICAL DATING METHOD BY USING ELECTRON MICROPROBE AT UFMG. Themonazite U-Th-Pb chemical dating method (non-isotopic) by electron microprobe has been developed for about 20 years and has theacceptance of the geological community by presenting results that are equivalent to the isotope U-Pb geochronology. This mineral containsnegligible amounts of common lead, keeping only radiogenic Pb from the Th and U of this mineral. The development of this method in themicroanalysis laboratory of the Physics Department- UFMG shows that the monazite U, Th and Pb chemical data provided by itsmicroprobe produce non-isotopic ages for it that are similar to the U-Pb isotopic ages produced by LA-ICP-MS technique. Monazite grainsfrom marine placers of Buena (RJ) isotopically dated by method U-Pb between 530 and 580 Ma were chemically dated at UFMG between505 and 580 Ma. These results are consistent each other and put the laboratory available to the geoscience community as a tool inobtaining monazite ages.Keywords: MONAZITE, CHEMICAL DATING, ELECTRON MICROPROBE, UFMG

Chemical Methods

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Herz ◽  
Ervan G. Garrison
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Change ◽  
Age Determination ◽  
Chemical Processes ◽  
Chemical Methods ◽  
Amino Acid Racemization ◽  
Singular Event ◽  
Archaeological Materials ◽  
History Of ◽  
Absolute Age ◽  
Chemical Dating

Time is nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once" (anonymous). Time is a continuum—we sense this continuum as a succession of events. In archaeological matters it is one of the most salient attributes. To determine time accurately the archaeologist must rely on modern dating techniques. Age determination by chemical methods relies on the constancy or predictability of rates of chemical processes. For instance the oxidation of iron—rust—could be used for dating purposes if one could determine a chemical rate, in this case that of oxidation, that applied to more than the singular event. Unfortunately, the rate of the oxidation of iron is highly variable, being affected by temperature, available moisture, and the particular type of iron (mild, cast, stainless, etc.). Another common chemical change is the patination of certain types of glass. Yet here, too, the process is highly variable, making dating impractical. Still, there have been attempts to use patination and rock "varnish" for archaeological dating, as we shall see. In the main, chemical dating is used to determine relative ages since absolute ages require calibration for each sample and its find site using independent dating measures such as radiometric or dendrochronological techniques. We shall first discuss the relative techniques based on the uptake or decrease in fluorine, uranium, and nitrogen found in bone. This is most appropriate because these chemical techniques played a key role in unmasking one of the most famous frauds in the history of science: Piltdown Man. Next we shall examine the two most accepted chemical processes utilized in absolute age determination, which are based, respectively, on amino acid racemization and obsidian hydration. Finally, we shall examine a few techniques that show some promise for the dating of archaeological materials or deposits, such as those using patination ("varnish") and cation ratios. Our points of reference are those events we view as, in some sense, marking a change in the state of things. Stylistic or formal change in an archaeological facies can be a chronological landmark for the archaeologist and allows us to divide the continuum of time into discrete segments or phases.

An Evaluation of Dating of Diagenetic Xenotime by Electron Microprobe.

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (S2) ◽  
pp. 408-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan J. Griffin ◽  
Duncan Forbes ◽  
Neal J. McNaughton
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microprobe ◽  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Microprobe Analysis ◽  
Electron Microprobe Analysis ◽  
Decay Rates ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Isotopic Geochronology ◽  
Backscattered Electron ◽  
Dating Method ◽  
Chemical Dating

Xenotime is an igneous mineral commonly present in pegmatite and fractionated granite. Recent studies reveal that it also forms as a diagenetic mineral. Minute (0.1-5 μm) xenotime overgrowths typically crystallise on the surfaces of detrital zircon shortly after sedimentation, in a wide range of siliciclastic sedimentary units. For example, in backscattered electron (BSE) imaging using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), two minute, euhedral, pyramidal, xenotime overgrowths on an oscillatory-zoned detrital Ambergate zircon are evident (figure 1).Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) geochronology is a chemical dating method that uses precisely measured concentrations of U, Th, and Pb, and the decay rates of U238, U235, and Th232, to calculate an age for a mineral. The EMPA dating method used in this study to date igneous xenotime and igneous-metamorphic monazite is the chemical isochron method (CHIME). EMPA geochronology is not a widely used technique because of the higher precision of isotopic geochronology.

Experience of chemical Th-U-Pb chemical dating of zircon from metasomatic felsic veins of the Mridino area, Belomorian eclogite province

2015 ◽  
Vol 462 (1) ◽  
pp. 494-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Khiller ◽  
V. V. Reverdatto ◽  
A. N. Konilov ◽  
A. A. Viryus ◽  
K. A. Dokukina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Dating

Monazite U-Th/Pb chemical dating of the Early Carboniferous syn-kinematic MP/MT metamorphism in the Variscan French Massif Central

2009 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémie Melleton ◽  
Michel Faure ◽  
Alain Cocherie
Keyword(s):  
Electron Probe ◽  
Early Carboniferous ◽  
Variscan Belt ◽  
French Massif Central ◽  
Massif Central ◽  
Close Range ◽  
Chemical Dating

AbstractIn situ U-Th-Pb geochronology on monazite using Electron Probe Micro Analyser, constrained by structural and textural observations, has been performed on four samples from the Limousin area (northwest part of the French Massif Central) in order to date the syn-kinematic MP/MT metamorphism related to the top-to-the-NW shearing that deformed the stack of nappes in this zone of the Variscan belt. All the analyzed samples lead to a mean age at 360 ± 4 Ma. The close range of ages obtained during this study (360 Ma) and with the previous 40Ar-39Ar ones (360–350 Ma) suggests fast processes of cooling and exhumation during the Early Carboniferous in internal zones of the Variscan belt. The geodynamic significance of this Early Carboniferous event is discussed at the scale of the Ibero-Armorican orocline.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document