Kinetic and Thermodynamic Basis of Promoter Strength:  Multiple Steps of Transcription Initiation by T7 RNA Polymerase Are Modulated by the Promoter Sequence†

Biochemistry ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 3586-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv P. Bandwar ◽  
Yiping Jia ◽  
Natalie M. Stano ◽  
Smita S. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
T7 Rna Polymerase ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Thermodynamic Basis

scholarly journals The Length of Promoter Sequence Affects The De Novo Initiation By T7 RNA Polymerase in Vitro: New Insights Into The Evolution of Promoters For Single Subunit RNA Polymerases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Padmanabhan ◽  
Dennis Miller
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
T7 Rna Polymerase ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Single Subunit

1.1AbstractRNA polymerases (RNAPs) differ from other polymerases in that they can bind promoter sequences and initiate de novo transcription. Promoter recognition requires the presence of specific DNA binding domains in the polymerase. The structure and mechanistic aspects of transcription by the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) are well characterized. This single subunit RNAP belongs to the family of RNAPs which also includes the T3, SP6 and mitochondrial RNAPs. High specificity for its promoter, the requirement of no additional transcription factors, and high fidelity of initiation from a specific site in the promoter makes it the polymerase of choice to study the mechanistic aspects of transcription. The structure and function of the catalytic domains of this family of polymerases are highly conserved suggesting a common mechanism underlying transcription. Although the two groups of single subunit RNAPs, mitochondrial and bacteriophage, have remarkable structural conservation, they recognize quite dissimilar promoters. Specifically, the bacteriophage promoters recognize a 23 nucleotide promoter extending from −17 to + 6 nucleotides relative to the site of transcription initiation, while the well characterized promoter recognized by the yeast mitochondrial RNAP is nine nucleotides in length extending from −8 to +1 relative to the site of transcription initiation. Promoters recognized by the bacteriophage RNAPs are also well characterized with distinct functional domains involved in promoter recognition and transcription initiation. Thorough mutational studies have been conducted by altering individual base-pairs within these domains. Here we describe experiments to determine whether the prototype bacteriophage RNAP is able to recognize and initiate at truncated promoters similar to mitochondrial promoters. Using an in vitro oligonucleotide transcriptional system, we have assayed transcription initiation activity by T7 RNAP. When a complete or almost complete (20 to 16 nucleotide) double stranded T7 RNAP promoter sequence is present, small RNA’s are produced through template-independent and promoter-dependent stuttering corresponding to abortive initiation, and this effect was lost with a scrambled promoter sequence. When partial double stranded promoter sequences (10 to 12 nucleotides) are supplied, template dependent de novo initiation of RNA occurs at a site different from the canonical +1-initiation site. The site of transcription initiation is determined by a recessed 3’ end based paired to the template strand of DNA rather than relative to the partial promoter sequence. Understanding the mechanism underlying this observation helps us to understand the role of the elements in the T7 promoter, and provides insights into the promoter evolution of the single-subunit RNAPs.

scholarly journals Np4A alarmones function in bacteria as precursors to RNA caps

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 3560-3567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Luciano ◽  
Joel G. Belasco
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
E Coli ◽  
N Incorporation ◽  
Nascent Transcripts

Stresses that increase the cellular concentration of dinucleoside tetraphosphates (Np4Ns) have recently been shown to impact RNA degradation by inducing nucleoside tetraphosphate (Np4) capping of bacterial transcripts. However, neither the mechanism by which such caps are acquired nor the function of Np4Ns in bacteria is known. Here we report that promoter sequence changes upstream of the site of transcription initiation similarly affect both the efficiency with which Escherichia coli RNA polymerase incorporates dinucleoside polyphosphates at the 5′ end of nascent transcripts in vitro and the percentage of transcripts that are Np4-capped in E. coli, clear evidence for Np4 cap acquisition by Np4N incorporation during transcription initiation in bacterial cells. E. coli RNA polymerase initiates transcription more efficiently with Np4As than with ATP, particularly when the coding strand nucleotide that immediately precedes the initiation site is a purine. Together, these findings indicate that Np4Ns function in bacteria as precursors to Np4 caps and that RNA polymerase has evolved a predilection for synthesizing capped RNA whenever such precursors are abundant.

Core promoter-selective RNA polymerase II transcription

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Gross ◽  
Thomas Oelgeschläger
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rnap Ii

The initiation of mRNA synthesis in eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process that requires the assembly of general transcription factors and RNAP II (RNA polymerase II; also abbreviated as Pol II) into a pre-initiation complex at the core promoter. The core promoter is defined as the minimal DNA region that is sufficient to direct low levels of activator-independent (basal) transcription by RNAP II in vitro. The core promoter typically extends approx. 40 bp up- and down-stream of the start site of transcription and can contain several distinct core promoter sequence elements. Core promoters in higher eukaryotes are highly diverse in structure, and each core promoter sequence element is only found in a subset of genes. So far, only TATA box and INR (initiator) element have been shown to be capable of directing accurate RNAP II transcription initiation independent of other core promoter elements. Computational analysis of metazoan genomes suggests that the prevalence of the TATA box has been overestimated in the past and that the majority of human genes are TATA-less. While TATA-mediated transcription initiation has been studied in great detail and is very well understood, very little is known about the factors and mechanisms involved in the function of the INR and other core promoter elements. Here we summarize our current understanding of the factors and mechanisms involved in core promoter-selective transcription and discuss possible pathways through which diversity in core promoter architecture might contribute to combinatorial gene regulation in metazoan cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document