Equilibrium constant for binding of an actin filament capping protein to the barbed end of actin filaments

Biochemistry ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wanger ◽  
Albrecht Wegner
Keyword(s):  
Equilibrium Constant ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Capping Protein

scholarly journals Quantitative variations of ADF/cofilin’s multiple actions on actin filaments with pH

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Wioland ◽  
Antoine Jegou ◽  
Guillaume Romet-Lemonne
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Thermal Fluctuations ◽  
Protein Family ◽  
Single Filament ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Domain Boundaries ◽  
Single Protein

ABSTRACTActin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF)/cofilin is the main protein family promoting the disassembly of actin filaments, which is essential for numerous cellular functions. ADF/cofilin proteins disassemble actin filaments through different reactions, as they bind to their sides, sever them, and promote the depolymerization of the resulting ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments. Moreover, the efficiency of ADF/cofilin is known to be very sensitive to pH. ADF/cofilin thus illustrates two challenges in actin biochemistry: separating the different regulatory actions of a single protein, and characterizing them as a function of specific biochemical conditions. Here, we investigate the different reactions of ADF/cofilin on actin filaments, over four different values of pH ranging from pH 6.6 to pH 7.8, using single filament microfluidics techniques. We show that lowering pH reduces the effective filament severing rate by increasing the rate at which filaments become saturated by ADF/cofilin, thereby reducing the number of ADF/cofilin domain boundaries, where severing can occur. The severing rate per domain boundary, however, remains unchanged at different pH values. The ADF/cofilin-decorated filaments (refered to as “cofilactin” filaments) depolymerize from both ends. We show here that, at physiological pH (pH 7.0 to 7.4), the pointed end depolymerization of cofilactin filaments is barely faster than that of bare filaments. In contrast, cofilactin barbed ends undergo an “unstoppable” depolymerization (depolymerizing for minutes despite the presence of free actin monomers and capping protein in solution), throughout our range of pH. We thus show that, at physiological pH, the main contribution of ADF/cofilin to filament depolymerization is at the barbed end.A number of key cellular processes rely on the proper assembly and disassembly of actin filament networks 1. The central regulator of actin disassembly is the ADF/cofilin protein family 2, 3, which comprises three isoforms in mammals: cofilin-1 (cof1, found in nearly all cell types), cofilin-2 (cof2, found primarily in muscles) and Actin Depolymerization Factor (ADF, found mostly in neurons and epithelial cells). We refer to them collectively as “ADF/cofilin”.Over the years, the combined efforts of several labs have led to the following understanding of actin filament disassembly by ADF/cofilin. Molecules of ADF/cofilin bind stoechiometrically 4, 5 to the sides of actin filaments, with a strong preference for ADP-actin subunits 6–10. Though ADF/cofilin molecules do not contact each other 11, they bind in a cooperative manner, leading to the formation of ADF/cofilin domains on the filaments 5, 7, 9, 12, 13. Compared to bare F-actin, the filament portions decorated by ADF/cofilin (refered to as “cofilactin”) are more flexible 14, 15 and exhibit a shorter right-handed helical pitch, with a different subunit conformation 11, 16–19. Thermal fluctuations are then enough to sever actin filaments at (or near) domain boundaries8, 9, 13, 20, 21. Cofilactin filaments do not sever, but depolymerize from both ends 13 thereby renewing the actin monomer pool.ADF/cofilin thus disassembles actin filaments through the combination of different actions. As such, it vividly illustrates a current challenge in actin biochemistry: identifying and quantifying the multiple reactions involving a single protein. This is a very difficult task for bulk solution assays, where a large number of reactions take place simultaneously, and single-filament techniques have played a key role in deciphering ADF/cofilin’s actions 9, 13, 20, 22–24. In particular, the microfluidics-based method that we have developed over the past years, is a powerful tool for such investigations 25. It has recently allowed us to quantify the kinetics of the aforementioned reactions, and to discover that ADF/cofilin-saturated filament (cofilactin) barbed ends can hardly stop depolymerizing, even when ATP-G-actin and capping protein are present in solution 13.In addition, ADF/cofilin is very sensitive to pH 4, 5, 26–29. In cells, pH can be a key regulatory factor 30. It can vary between compartments, between cell types, and be specifically modulated. We can consider that a typical cytoplasmic pH would be comprised between 7.0 and 7.4. Recently, we have quantified the different reactions involving ADF/cofilin at pH 7.8 13, leaving open the question of how these reaction rates are indivdually affected by pH variations. For instance, it has been reported that ADF/cofilin is a more potent filament disassembler at higher pH values 4, 5, 26–29 but the actual impact of pH on the rate constants of individual reactions has yet to be characterized. Moreover, whether the unstoppable barbed end depolymerization that we have recently discovered for ADF/cofilin-saturated filaments at pH 7.8 13 remains significant at lower, more physiological pH values is an open question.Here, we investigate how the different contributions of ADF/cofilin (using unlabeled ADF, unlabeled cof1 and eGFP-cof1) to actin filament disassembly depend on pH, which we varied from 6.6 to 7.8. We first present the methods which we have used to do so, based on the observation of individual filaments, using microfluidics (Fig. 1). We measured cofilin’s abitility to decorate actin filament by binding to its sides (Fig. 2), and the rate at which individual cofilin domains severed actin filaments (Fig. 3). We next quantified the kinetic parameters of filament ends, for bare and ADF/cofilin-saturated (cofilactin) filaments (Fig. 4), and we specifically quantified the extent to which the barbed ends of cofilactin filaments are in a state which can hardly stop depolymerizing (Fig. 5). We finally summarize our results (Fig. 6).

scholarly journals Profilin-mediated Competition between Capping Protein and Formin Cdc12p during Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2313-2324 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Kovar ◽  
Jian-Qiu Wu ◽  
Thomas D. Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Cell Separation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Contractile Ring ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Division Site ◽  
Ring Constriction

Fission yeast capping protein SpCP is a heterodimer of two subunits (Acp1p and Acp2p) that binds actin filament barbed ends. Neither acp1 nor acp2 is required for viability, but cells lacking either or both subunits have cytokinesis defects under stressful conditions, including elevated temperature, osmotic stress, or in combination with numerous mild mutations in genes important for cytokinesis. Defects arise as the contractile ring constricts and disassembles, resulting in delays in cell separation. Genetic and biochemical interactions show that the cytokinesis formin Cdc12p competes with capping protein for actin filament barbed ends in cells. Deletion of acp2 partly suppresses cytokinesis defects in temperature-sensitive cdc12-112 cells and mild overexpression of capping protein kills cdc12-112 cells. Biochemically, profilin has opposite effects on filaments capped with Cdc12p and capping protein. Profilin depolymerizes actin filaments capped by capping protein but allows filaments capped by Cdc12p to grow at their barbed ends. Once associated with a barbed end, either Cdc12p or capping protein prevents the other from influencing polymerization at that end. Given that capping protein arrives at the division site 20 min later than Cdc12p, capping protein may slowly replace Cdc12p on filament barbed ends in preparation for filament disassembly during ring constriction.

scholarly journals The structure of the actin filament uncapping complex mediated by twinfilin

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. eabd5271
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Mwangangi ◽  
Edward Manser ◽  
Robert C. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Binding Surface ◽  
Actin Capping Protein ◽  
Actin Capping

Uncapping of actin filaments is essential for driving polymerization and depolymerization dynamics from capping protein–associated filaments; however, the mechanisms of uncapping leading to rapid disassembly are unknown. Here, we elucidated the x-ray crystal structure of the actin/twinfilin/capping protein complex to address the mechanisms of twinfilin uncapping of actin filaments. The twinfilin/capping protein complex binds to two G-actin subunits in an orientation that resembles the actin filament barbed end. This suggests an unanticipated mechanism by which twinfilin disrupts the stable capping of actin filaments by inducing a G-actin conformation in the two terminal actin subunits. Furthermore, twinfilin disorders critical actin-capping protein interactions, which will assist in the dissociation of capping protein, and may promote filament uncapping through a second mechanism involving V-1 competition for an actin-binding surface on capping protein. The extensive interactions with capping protein indicate that the evolutionary conserved role of twinfilin is to uncap actin filaments.

scholarly journals Twinfilin, a molecular mailman for actin monomers

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Palmgren ◽  
Maria Vartiainen ◽  
Pekka Lappalainen
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Actin Monomer ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Filament Assembly

Twinfilin is a ubiquitous actin-monomer-binding protein that is composed of two ADF-homology domains. It forms a 1:1 complex with ADP-actin-monomers,inhibits nucleotide exchange on actin monomers and prevents assembly of the monomer into filaments. The two ADF-H domains in twinfilin probably have 3D structures similar to those of the ADF/cofilin proteins and overlapping actin-binding sites. Twinfilin also interacts with PtdIns(4,5)P2, which inhibits its actin-monomer-sequestering activity in vitro. Mutations in the twinfilin gene result in defects in the bipolar budding pattern in S. cerevisiae and in a rough eye phenotype and aberrant bristle morphology in Drosophila melanogaster. These phenotypes are caused by the uncontrolled polymerization of actin filaments in the absence of twinfilin. Studies on budding yeast suggest that twinfilin contributes to actin filament turnover by localizing actin monomers, in their `inactive'ADP-form, to the sites of rapid filament assembly. This is mediated through direct interactions between twinfilin and capping protein. Therefore,twinfilin might serve as a link between rapid actin filament depolymerization and assembly in cells.

scholarly journals A structure-derived mechanism reveals how capping protein promotes nucleation in branched actin networks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Funk ◽  
Felipe Merino ◽  
Matthias Schaks ◽  
Klemens Rottner ◽  
Stefan Raunser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Network ◽  
Essential Factor ◽  
Interaction Site ◽  
Actin Networks ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Terminal Filament

Heterodimeric capping protein (CP/CapZ) is an essential factor for the assembly of branched actin networks, which push against cellular membranes to drive a large variety of cellular processes. Aside from terminating filament growth, CP stimulates the nucleation of actin filaments by the Arp2/3 complex in branched actin networks through an unclear mechanism. Here, we report the structure of capped actin filament barbed ends, which reveals how CP not only prevents filament elongation, but also controls access to both terminal filament subunits. In addition to its primary binding site that blocks the penultimate subunit, we find that the CP sterically occludes the central interaction site of the terminal actin protomer through one of its C-terminal tentacle extensions. Deletion of this β tentacle only modestly impairs capping. However in the context of a growing branched actin network, its removal potently inhibits nucleation promoting factors (NPFs) by tethering them to capped filament ends. End tethering of NPFs prevents their loading with actin monomers required for activation of the Arp2/3 complex and thus strongly inhibits branched network assembly both in cells and reconstituted motility assays. Our results mechanistically explain how CP couples two opposed processes -capping and nucleation- in branched actin network assembly.

scholarly journals Mathematical Modeling of Endocytic Actin Patch Kinetics in Fission Yeast: Disassembly Requires Release of Actin Filament Fragments

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 2905-2915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Berro ◽  
Vladimir Sirotkin ◽  
Thomas D. Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Rapid Loss ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Actin Patch ◽  
Over Time

We used the dendritic nucleation hypothesis to formulate a mathematical model of the assembly and disassembly of actin filaments at sites of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in fission yeast. We used the wave of active WASp recruitment at the site of the patch formation to drive assembly reactions after activation of Arp2/3 complex. Capping terminated actin filament elongation. Aging of the filaments by ATP hydrolysis and γ-phosphate dissociation allowed actin filament severing by cofilin. The model could simulate the assembly and disassembly of actin and other actin patch proteins using measured cytoplasmic concentrations of the proteins. However, to account quantitatively for the numbers of proteins measured over time in the accompanying article ( Sirotkin et al., 2010 , MBoC 21: 2894–2904), two reactions must be faster in cells than in vitro. Conditions inside the cell allow capping protein to bind to the barbed ends of actin filaments and Arp2/3 complex to bind to the sides of filaments faster than the purified proteins in vitro. Simulations also show that depolymerization from pointed ends cannot account for rapid loss of actin filaments from patches in 10 s. An alternative mechanism consistent with the data is that severing produces short fragments that diffuse away from the patch.

scholarly journals Direct observation of actin filament severing by gelsolin and binding by gCap39 and CapZ.

1991 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1629-1638 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Bearer
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
Rhodamine Phalloidin ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Calcium Dependent ◽  
Definition Of

Dynamic behavior of actin filaments in cells is the basis of many different cellular activities. Remodeling of the actin filament network involves polymerization and depolymerization of the filaments. Proteins that regulate these behaviors include proteins that sever and/or cap actin filaments. This report presents direct observation of severing of fluorescently-labeled actin filaments. Coverslips coated with gelsolin, a multi-domain, calcium-dependent capping and severing protein, bound rhodamine-phalloidin-saturated filaments along their length in the presence of EGTA. Upon addition of calcium, attached filaments bent as they broke. Actophorin, a low molecular weight, monomer sequestering, calcium-independent severing protein did not sever phalloidin-saturated filaments. Both gCap 39, a gelsolin-like, calcium-dependent capping protein that does not sever filaments, and CapZ, a heterodimeric, non-calcium-dependent capping protein, bound the filaments by one end to the coverslip. Visualization of individual filaments also revealed severing activity present in mixtures of actin-binding proteins isolated by filamentous actin affinity chromatography from early Drosophila embryos. This activity was different from either gelsolin or actophorin because it was not inhibited by phalloidin, but was calcium independent. The results of these studies provide new information about the molecular mechanisms of severing and capping by well-characterized proteins as well as definition of a novel type of severing activity.

Tropomodulin assembles early in myofibrillogenesis in chick skeletal muscle: evidence that thin filaments rearrange to form striated myofibrils

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1111-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Almenar-Queralt ◽  
C.C. Gregorio ◽  
V.M. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Primary Cultures ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Thin Filaments ◽  
Phalloidin Staining ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Filament Bundles ◽  
End Capping

Actin filament lengths in muscle and nonmuscle cells are believed to depend on the regulated activity of capping proteins at both the fast growing (barbed) and slow growing (pointed) filament ends. In striated muscle, the pointed end capping protein, tropomodulin, has been shown to maintain the lengths of thin filaments in mature myofibrils. To determine whether tropomodulin might also be involved in thin filament assembly, we investigated the assembly of tropomodulin into myofibrils during differentiation of primary cultures of chick skeletal muscle cells. Our results show that tropomodulin is expressed early in differentiation and is associated with the earliest premyofibrils which contain overlapping and misaligned actin filaments. In addition, tropomodulin can be found in actin filament bundles at the distal tips of growing myotubes, where sarcomeric alpha-actinin is not always detected, suggesting that tropomodulin caps actin filament pointed ends even before the filaments are cross-linked into Z bodies by alpha-actinin. Tropomodulin staining exhibits an irregular punctate pattern along the length of premyofibrils that demonstrate a smooth phalloidin staining pattern for F-actin. Strikingly, the tropomodulin dots often appear to be located between the closely spaced, dot-like Z bodies that are stained for (α)-actinin. Thus, in the earliest premyofibrils, the pointed ends of the thin filaments are clustered and partially aligned with respect to the Z bodies (the location of the barbed filament ends). At later stages of differentiation, the tropomodulin dots become aligned into regular periodic striations concurrently with the appearance of striated phalloidin staining for F-actin and alignment of Z bodies into Z lines. Tropomodulin, together with the barbed end capping protein, CapZ, may function from the earliest stages of myofibrillogenesis to restrict the lengths of newly assembled thin filaments by capping their ends; thus, transitions from nonstriated to striated myofibrils in skeletal muscle are likely due principally to filament rearrangements rather than to filament polymerization or depolymerization. Rearrangements of actin filaments capped at their pointed and barbed ends may be a general mechanism by which cells restructure their actin cytoskeletal networks during cell growth and differentiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document